This paper is an attempt to take a critical sociological look at the UK government’s flagship ‘Big Society’ policy. To do this I utilize the political sociology of Émile Durkheim, specifically what I call his ‘socialist theory’. This overlooked aspect of Durkheim’s sociology contains a strong normative critique and alternative project concerning the role of the State, private property, economic regulation and inequality. By applying this to the Big Society it is argued that the latter will result in: increased moral fragmentation, the furthering of economic inequality and the development of a ‘postcode lottery’. Instead, Durkheim’s advocacy of functional representation in the form of the ‘corporations’ seems to hold some contemporary relevance.
BaumanZ (1976) Socialism: The Active Utopia. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
2.
BaumanZ (2005) ‘Durkheim’s Society Revisited’, pp. 360–382 in AlexanderJSmithP (eds) Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BeckU (2005) ‘How Not to Become a Museum Piece’, British Journal of Sociology56(3): 335–343.
4.
BeckerH (1967) ‘Whose Side Are We On?’, Social Problems13(3): 239–247.
5.
BlackA (1984) Guilds and Civil Society in European Political Thought from the Twelfth Century to the Present. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.
6.
BlondP (2010) Red Tory: How Left and Right Have Broken Britain, and How We Can Fix It. London: Faber and Faber.
7.
BottomoreT (1981) ‘A Marxist Consideration of Durkheim’, Social Forces59(4): 902–917.
ChristieI (2011) ‘Associative Democracy and Big Society: Some Reflections’, pp. 30–38 in WestallA (ed.) Revisiting Associative Democracy. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
12.
CollinsR (2005) ‘The Durkheimian Movement in France and in World Sociology’, pp. 101–135 in AlexanderJSmithP (eds) Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CoserL (1960) ‘Durkheim’s Conservatism and its Implication for his Sociological Theory’, pp. 211–232 in WolffK (ed.) Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
15.
CrickB (1987) Socialism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
DawsonM (2011) ‘A Libertarian Socialist Critique of the Political Sociology of Late Modernity’, Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex, UK.
DiamondP (2011) ‘Mutualism and Social Democracy’, pp. 7–13 in McTernanM (ed.) What Mutualism Means for Labour. London: Policy Network.
19.
DurkheimE ([1885] 1986) ‘Social Property and Democracy: Review of Alfred Fouillee, La Propriete Sociale et la Democratie (Paris, 1884)’, pp. 86–96 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. GiddensA. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
20.
DurkheimE ([1893] 1986) ‘Belot and Socialism’, pp. 113–120 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. GiddensA. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
21.
DurkheimE ([1897] 1986) ‘Review of A. Labriola: Essais sur la Conception Matérialiste de L’Histoire (Paris, 1897)’, pp. 128–136 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. GiddensA. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
22.
DurkheimE ([1899a] 1986) ‘Review of Saverio Merlino: Forms et Essence du Socialisme (Paris, 1897)’, pp. 136–145 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. A Giddens. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
DurkheimE ([1899b] 1986) ‘Review of Gaston Richard: Le Socialisme et la Science Sociale (Paris, 1897)’, pp. 121–128 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. GiddensA. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24.
DurkheimE ([1908] 1986) ‘A Debate on Civil Service Unions’, pp. 145–153 in Durkheim on Politics and the State, ed. GiddensA. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
25.
DurkheimE (1952) Suicide. London: Routledge.
26.
DurkheimE (1959) Socialism and Saint-Simon. London: Routledge.
27.
DurkheimE (1984) The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
DurkheimE (1992) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.
29.
EldridgeJ (2000) ‘Sociology and the Third Way’, pp. 131–145 in EldridgeJMacInnesJScottSWarhurstCWitzA (eds) For Sociology: Legacies and Prospects. Durham: Sociology Press.
30.
FillouxJ (1993) ‘Inequalities and Social Stratification in Durkheim’s Sociology’, pp. 211–228 in TurnerS (ed.) Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist. London: Routledge.
31.
FournierM (2005) ‘Durkheim’s Life and Context: Something New about Durkheim?’, pp. 41–69 in AlexanderJSmithP (eds) Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
GaneM (1984) ‘Institutional Socialism and the Sociological Critique of Communism (Introduction to Durkheim and Mauss)’, Economy and Society13(3): 304–330.
33.
GiddensA ([1971] 1995) ‘Durkheim’s Political Sociology’, pp. 78–115 in GiddensAPolitics, Sociology and Social Theory: Encounters with Classical and Contemporary Social Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
GlasmanM (2010) ‘Society not State: The Challenge of the Big Society’, Public Policy Research17(2): 59–63.
35.
JessopB (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
JordanB (2010) Why the Third Way Failed: Economics, Morality and the Origins of the ‘Big Society’. Bristol: Policy Press.
37.
KerrPByrneCFosterE (2011) ‘Theorising Cameronism’, Political Studies Review9(2): 193–207.
38.
KisbyB (2010) ‘The Big Society: Power to the People?’, The Political Quarterly81(4): 484–491.
39.
LevitasR (1996) ‘The Concept of Social Exclusion and the New Durkheimian Hegemony’, Critical Social Policy16(46): 5–20.
40.
LukesS (1973) Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. London: Penguin.
41.
MestrovicS (1998) Anthony Giddens: The Last Modernist. London: Routledge.
42.
MullerH (1993) ‘Durkheim’s Political Sociology’, pp. 95–110 in TurnerS (ed.) Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist. London: Routledge.
43.
NeyerJ (1960) ‘Individualism and Socialism in Durkheim’, pp. 32–76 in WolffK (ed.) Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
44.
NormanJ (2010) The Big Society: The Anatomy of the New Politics. Buckingham: University of Buckingham Press.
45.
RichterM (1960) ‘Durkheim’s Politics and Political Theory’, pp. 170–210 in WolffK (ed.) Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
46.
RustinM (2008) ‘New Labour and the Theory of Globalization’, Critical Social Policy28(3): 273–282.
