Incidence of breast cancer is rising globally, with little attention paid by government health planners to upstream causal factors. The research reported here used qualitative methods to explore the usefulness of creating opportunities for dialogue between various `communities of interest' - laypeople, health activists, environmentalists, scientists, health professionals and politicians - concerned about possible environmental factors in breast cancer aetiology. The paper reports discussion of some of the methodological difficulties in investigating the causes of breast cancer, what constitutes `evidence' and the perceived obstacles to adopting a precautionary approach to the prevention of breast cancer. The key difference between viewpoints concerns the appropriate evidence for - and response to - risk. We have argued that these differences are both ideological and epistemological; we are concerned here to identify how a tripartite categorization of positions is articulated through participants' narrative accounts and arguments about how science contributes to the basis for policy making.
Adami, H.-O.,Hunter, D. and Trichopoulos, D. (eds) (2002) Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Antonopoulou, L. and van Meurs, P. (2003) `The Precautionary Principle within European Union Public Health Policy: The Implementation of the Principle under Conditions of Supranationality and Citizenship', Health Policy66(2): 179-97.
3.
Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
Bloor, M. (2000) `The South Wales Miners Federation, Miners' Lung and the Instrumental Use of Expertise, 1900-1950', Social Studies of Science1: 125-40.
5.
Brown, P. (1992) `Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing', Journal of Health and Social Behavior33(3): 267-81.
6.
Brown, P. (2003) `Qualitative Methods in Environmental Health Research' , Environmental Health Perspectives111: 24-38.
7.
Brown, P., Zavestoski, S.M., McCormick, S., Mandelbaum, J. and Luebke, T. (2001) `Print Media Coverage of Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer', Sociology of Health and Illness23(6): 747-75.
8.
Cinderby, S. (1999) `Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for Participation: The Future of Environmental GIS?', International Journal of Environment and Pollution11(3): 304-15.
9.
Cinderby, S. and Potts, L. (2007) `Suspicious Cartographers: Some Realities of Research into Stakeholder Understanding of the Causes and Possible Prevention of Breast Cancer', Science and Public Policy34(4): 345-54.
10.
Colborn, T., Dumanoski, D. and Myers, P. (1997) Our Stolen Future. New York : Dutton.
11.
Davis, D.L., Axelrod, D., Bailey, L., Gaynor, M. and Sasco, A. (1998) `Rethinking Breast Cancer Risk and the Environment: the Case for the Precautionary Principle', Environmental Health Perspectives106(9): 523-9.
12.
Department of Health (2000) ` The NHS Cancer Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform' [http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4009609&chk=n4LXTU ].
13.
Department of Health (2002) Guidance on Cancer Services Improving Outcomes in Breast Cancer Manual Update .
14.
Dolan, P., Cookson, R. and Ferguson, B. (1999) `Effect of Discussion and Deliberation on the Public's Views of Priority Setting in Health Care: Focus Group Study', British Medical Journal318: 916-19.
15.
Driedger, S.M. and Eyles, J. (2001) `Organochlorines and Breast Cancer: The Uses of Scientific Evidence in Claims-making', Social Science and Medicine52: 1589-1605.
16.
European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2001) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: EEA.
17.
Evans, E. (2003) What is the Connection between Chemicals and Breast Cancer?San Francisco: Breast Cancer Fund and Breast Cancer Action.
18.
Gaventa, J. (2002) `Science and Citizenship in a Global Context', transcript of conference proceedings, Sussex Institute of Development Studies, 12-13 December.
19.
Gee, D. and Greenberg, M. (2001) `Asbestos: From ``Magic'' to Malevolent Material' , pp. 49-63 in European Environmental Agency Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: EEA.
Harremoes, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B. and Guedes Vaz, S. (2002) The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings. London: Earthscan.
22.
Hillman, M. (2004) How We Can Save the Planet. London: Penguin.
23.
Hulka, B. and Stark, A. (1995) `Breast Cancer: Cause and Prevention', The Lancet346 (30 September): 883-7.
24.
Irwin, A., Jones, K. and Stilgoe, J. (2006) Received Wisdom: Opening up Expert Advice. London: Demos.
25.
Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (1996) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: SAGE.
26.
McIver, S. (1997) An Evaluation of the King's Fund Citizens' Juries Programme. University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre.
27.
Newby, J.A. and Howard, C.V. (2005) `Environmental Influences in Cancer Aetiology' , Journal of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine15(2-3): 54-114.
28.
NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence) (2002) `Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Breast Cancer', Medical Update.
29.
Popay, J. and Williams, G. (eds) (1994) Researching the People's Health: Social Research and Health Care. London: Routledge.
30.
Popay, J. and Williams, G. (1996) `Public Health Research and Lay Knowledge', Social Science and Medicine42(5): 759-68.
31.
Popay, J., Bennett, S., Thomas, C., Williams, G., Gatrell, A. and Bostock, G. (2003) `Beyond ``Beer, Fags, Eggs and Chips''? Exploring Lay Understanding of Social Inequalities in Health', Sociology of Health and Illness25(1): 1-23.
32.
Porritt, J. (2005) Capitalism as if the World Matters. London: Earthscan.
33.
Potts, L. (2004) `Mapping Citizen Expertise about Environmental Risk of Breast Cancer', Critical Social Policy24(4): 550-74.
34.
Potts, L. (2007) `A Community of Expertise: Positioning the UK Environmental Breast Cancer Movement', pp. 191-203 in C. Clay, M. Madden and L. Potts (eds) Towards Understanding Community: People and Places . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
35.
Rogers, B. and Robinson, E. (2004) The Benefits of Community Engagement: A Review of the Evidence. London: Home Office .
36.
Sasco, A. (2001) `Epidemiology of Breast Cancer: An Environmental Disease?', APMIS109: 321-32.
37.
Sharpe, R. and Irvine, D.S. (2004) `HowStrong is the Evidence of a Link between Environmental Chemicals and Adverse Effects on Human Reproductive Health?', British Medical Journal328 (21 February): 447-51.
38.
Sherman, J.D. (2000) Life's Delicate Balance: A Guide to Causes and Prevention of Breast Cancer. New York: Taylor & Francis.
39.
Steingraber, S. (1997) Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
40.
Steingraber, S. (2003) `Contaminated without Consent: Why our Exposure to Chemicals in Air, Food and Water Violates Human Rights', Rachel Carson Memorial Lecture, 3 December, London.
41.
UK Public Health Association (UKPHA) (2007 ) Climates and Change: The Urgent Need to Connect Health and Sustainable Development. London: UKPHA. [http://www.ukpha.org.uk/media/PDF_Documents/climates%20and%20change_master_may_30.pdf]
42.
Wynne, B. (2002) `Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?', Current Sociology50(3): 459-77.
