The paper’s starting point is an analysis of New Labour’s agenda for children in an emergent ‘social investment state’. It provides an overview of policies for children, which simultaneously invest in children and regulate them and their parents/mothers. Although children have moved to the heart of social policy, there is some disquiet about the way they are being positioned in this brave new world of social investment. This disquiet focuses in particular on: the construction of children as ‘becomings’ rather than ‘beings’; the paid-work-focused and future-oriented model of citizenship; the relative neglect of groups of children who are not seen to represent such a good investment; and the eclipse of parents’, and in particular, mothers’ welfare. The final section sketches out how the social investment approach might be modified in the interests of children’s well-being and flourishing and with reference to principles of (gendered) social justice.
Andersson, M. (2005) ‘Why Gender Equality?’, pp. 171-182 in A. Giddens and P. Diamond (eds) The New Egalitarianism. Cambridge: Polity .
2.
Bates, F. (2005) ‘Think Tank’ , Society Guardian 9 March.
3.
Blair, T. (1998) The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century. London: Fabian Society .
4.
reproduced in R. Walker , ed. (1999) Ending Child Poverty, pp. 7-18. Bristol: Policy Press .
5.
Blair, T. (2004) Oral answers, House of Commons Hansard 11 February, col. 1410.
6.
Brown, G. (2000) Speech to the Children and Young Person’s Unit Conference, Islington, London, 15 November.
7.
Burchardt, T. (2005) ‘Selective Inclusion: Asylum Seekers and other Marginalised Groups’, pp. 209-228 in J. Hills and K. Stewart (eds) A More Equal Society? New Labour, Poverty, Inequality and Exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press .
8.
Cemlyn, S. and Clark, C. (2005) ‘The Social Exclusion of Gypsy and Traveller Children’, pp. 150-165 in G. Preston (ed.) At Greatest Risk: The Children most likely to be Poor. London: Child Poverty Action Group .
9.
Child Poverty Action Group (2005) Ten Steps to a Society Free of Child Poverty. London: Child Poverty Action Group .
10.
Crawley, H. and Lester, T. (2005) No Place for a Child. Children in UK Immigration Detention: Impacts, Alternatives and Safeguards. London: Save the Children .
11.
CRC (2002) Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights [www.unhchr.ch].
12.
Deacon, A. (2002) Perspectives on Welfare. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press .
13.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2005) ‘Blunkett Calls on Men to Consider Career in Childcare’, Press Release, 6 June.
14.
Dobrowolsky, A. (2002) ‘Rhetoric versus Reality: the Figure of the Child and New Labour’s Strategic “Social Investment State”’ , Studies in Political EconomyAutumn: 43-73 .
15.
Dobrowolsky, A. (2004) ‘The Chrétien Liberal Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities with little Cause for Celebration’ , The Review of Constitutional Studies9(1 & 2): 171-198 .
16.
Dobrowolsky, A. and Jenson, J. (2004) ‘Shifting Representations of Citizenship: Canadian Politics of “Women” and “Children”’ , Social Politics11(2): 154-180 .
17.
End Child Poverty (2005) Ten Policies to Take One Million Children out of Poverty by 2010. London: End Child Poverty .
18.
Fawcett, B. , Featherstone, B. and Goddard, J. (2004) Contemporary Child Care Policy and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
19.
Featherstone, B. (2006) ‘Why Gender Matters in Child Welfare Protection’ , Critical Social Policy26(2): 294-314
20.
Fitzpatrick, P. (2005) ‘Asylum Seeker Families’, pp. 92-108 in G. Preston (ed.) At Greatest Risk: The Children most likely to be Poor. London: Child Poverty Action Group .
21.
Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus. London and New York: Routledge .
22.
Fraser, N. (2003) ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics’, pp. 7-109 in N. Fraser and A. Honneth (eds) Redistribution or Recognition?London and New York: Verso .
23.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity .
24.
Gillies, V. (2005) ‘Meeting Parents’ Needs? Discourses of “Support” and “Inclusion” in Family Policy’ , Critical Social Policy25(1): 70-90 .
25.
Glass, N. (2005) ‘Surely Some Mistake?’ , Society Guardian 5 January: 2-3 .
26.
Harker, L. (2004) ‘Lessons from Reggio Emilia’ , Guardian 11 November.
27.
Hendrick, H. (2005a) ‘Child Welfare: the Historical Background’, pp. 7-11 in H. Hendrick (ed.) Child Welfare and Social Policy: An Essential Reader. Bristol: Policy Press .
28.
Hendrick, H. (2005b) ‘Identifying and Exploring Concepts and Approaches’, pp. 51-64 in H. Hendrick (ed.) Child Welfare and Social Policy: An Essential Reader. Bristol: Policy Press .
29.
Henricson, C. and Bainham, A. (2005) The Child and Family Policy Divide. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .
30.
Hewett, T. , Smalley, N. , Dunkerley, D. and Scourfield, J. (2005) Uncertain Futures: Children Seeking Asylum in Wales. Cardiff: Save the Children Wales .
HM Treasury (2004) Choice for Parents, the Best Start for Children: A Ten Year Strategy for Child Care. London: HM Treasury .
33.
Hodge, M. (2004) Evidence to the Work and Pensions Committee, Child Poverty in the UK, Second Report of the Work and Pensions Committee, HC 85. London: The Stationery Office .
34.
Horgan, G. (2005) ‘Welfare-to-Work Policies and Child Poverty in Northern Ireland’ , Social Policy and Administration39(1): 49-64 .
35.
Hunter, C. and Nixon, J. (2001) ‘Taking the Blame and Losing the Home: Women and Anti-social Behaviour’ , Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law23(4): 395-410 .
36.
Jenson, J. (2001) ‘Rethinking Equality and Equity: Canadian Children and the Social Union’, pp. 111-129 in E. Broadbent (ed.) Democratic Equality: What Went Wrong?Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press .
37.
Jenson, J. (2004) ‘Changing the Paradigm: Family Responsibility or Investing in Children’ , Canadian Journal of Sociology29(2): 169-194 .
38.
Jowell, T. (2005) ‘Play-makers’ , Community Care 21-7 April: 36-37 .
39.
Kelley, N. (2004) ‘Child’s Play’ , Community Care 1-7 July: 34-35 .
40.
Lister, R. (2002) ‘The Dilemmas of Pendulum Politics: Balancing Paid Work, Care and Citizenship’ , Economy and Society31(4): 520-532 .
41.
Lister, R. (2003a) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave .
42.
Lister, R. (2003b) ‘Investing in the Citizen-Workers of the Future: Transformations in Citizenship and the State under New Labour’ , Social Policy and Administration37(5): 427-443 .
43.
Lister, R. (2004a) ‘Ending Child Poverty: a Matter of Human Rights, Citizenship and Social Justice’, pp. 59-67 in P. Doran (ed.) Ending Child Poverty in 2020: The First Five Years. London: Child Poverty Action Group .
44.
Lister, R. (2004b) Poverty. Cambridge: Polity .
45.
Lister, R. (2004c) ‘The Third Way’s Social Investment State’, pp. 157-181 in J. Lewis and R. Surender (eds) Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way?Oxford: Oxford University Press .
46.
Lister, R. (2005) ‘Children, Well-being and Citizenship’ , paper presented to Social Policy Association Annual Conference, University of Bath, 27-9 June.
47.
Malikzada, K. M. and Qadri, A. (2005) ‘Postscript on Asylum Seekers and Refugees’, pp. 205-209 in M. Barry (ed.) Youth Policy and Social Inclusion. London and New York: Routledge .
48.
Mayhew, E. and Bradshaw, J. (2005) ‘Mothers, Babies and the Risks of Poverty’ , Poverty121: 13-16 .
49.
Micklewright, J. and Stewart, K. (2000a) ‘Child Well-being and Social Cohesion’ , New Economy7(1): 18-23 .
50.
Micklewright, J. and Stewart, K. (2000b) The Welfare of Europe’s Children. Bristol: Policy Press .
51.
Molyneux, M. (1984) ‘Mobilisation without Emancipation?’ , Critical Social Policy10: 59-75 .
52.
Morrow, M. , Hankivsky, O. and Varcoe, C. (2004) ‘Women and Violence: Effects of Dismantling the Welfare State’ , Critical Social Policy24(4): 358-384 .
53.
Neale, B. (ed.) (2004) Young Children’s Citizenship. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .
54.
Prout, A. (2000) ‘Children’s Participation: Control and Self-realisation in British Late Modernity’ , Children and Society14: 304-315 .
55.
Respect Task Force (2006) Respect Action Plan. London: Home Office .
56.
Ridge, T. (2002) Childhood Poverty and Social Exclusion: From a Child’s Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press .
57.
Ridge, T. (2005) ‘Feeling under Pressure: Low-income Girls Negotiating School Life’, pp. 23-36 in G. Lloyd (ed.) Problem Girls. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer .
58.
Save the Children (2005) The Well-being of Children in the UK: Summary. London: Save the Children .
59.
Scourfield, J. and Drakeford, M. (2002) ‘New Labour and the “Problem of Men”’ , Critical Social Policy22(4): 619-640 .
60.
Shah, H. and Marks, N. (2004) A Well-being Manifesto for a Flourishing Society. London: New Economics Foundation .
61.
Sherraden, M. (2002) ‘From a Social Welfare State to a Social Investment State’, pp. 5-8 in C. Kober and W. Paxton (eds) Asset-based Welfare and Poverty. London: National Children’s Bureau .
62.
Standing, K. (1999) ‘Lone Mothers and “Parental” Employment: A Contradiction in Policy?’ , Journal of Social Policy28(3): 479-495 .
63.
Stanley, K. (2005) ‘Young Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the UK’, pp. 187-203 in M. Barry (ed.) Youth Policy and Social Inclusion. London and New York: Routledge .
64.
Stasiulis, D. (2002) ‘The Active Child Citizen: Lessons from Canadian Policy and the Children’s Movement’ , Citizenship Studies6(4): 507-538 .
Strategy Unit (2005) Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People. London: Cabinet Office .
67.
Toynbee, P. (2004) ‘Nanny Blair Would Win It’ , Guardian 2 July.
68.
Wiegers, W. (2002) The Framing of Poverty as “Child Poverty” and its Implications for Women. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada .
69.
Williams, F. (2001) ‘In and Beyond New Labour: Towards a new Political Ethics of Care’ , Critical Social Policy21(4): 467-493 .
70.
Williams, F. (2004a) Rethinking Families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation .
71.
Williams, F. (2004b) ‘What Matters is What Works: Why Every Child Matters to New Labour. Commentary on the DfES Green Paper Every Child Matters’ , Critical Social Policy24(3): 406-427 .
72.
Williams, F. and Roseneil, S. (2004) ‘Public Values of Parenting and Partnering: Voluntary Organizations and Welfare Politics in New Labour’s Britain’ , Social Politics11(2): 181-216 .
73.
Women’s Budget Group (WBG) (2005) Women’s and Children’s Poverty: Making the Links. London: Women’s Budget Group .
