Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing on the findings from a case study of a forum in which users of mental health services are brought into dialogue with officials, the author demonstrates the value of an approach to user involvement in which discourse itself is used as a primary data source. Using her observations of the forum’s meetings, as well as interviews with forum members, the author shows how power is exercised discursively in various apparently trivial ways, ensuring that the forum’s discourse remains within established normative boundaries and serving, ultimately, to reinforce existing institutionally defined power relations.

Keywords

accountability governance mental health psychiatry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes, M. and Bowl, R. (2001) Taking Over the Asylum: Empowerment and Mental Health. Basingstoke: Palgrave .

Barnes, M. and Prior, D. (1995) ‘Spoilt for Choice? How Consumerism Can Disempower Public Service Users’ , Public Money and Management July-September: 53-58 .

Barnes, M. and Shardlow, P. (1996) ‘Effective Consumers and Active Citizens: Strategies for Users’ Influence on Service and Beyond’ , Research Policy and Planning 14(1): 33-38 .

Barnes, M. and Shardlow, P. (1997) ‘From Passive Recipient to Active Citizen: Participation in Mental Health User Groups’ , Journal of Mental Health 6(3): 289-300 .

Beresford, P. (2001) ‘Service Users, Social Policy and the Future of Welfare’ , Critical Social Policy 21(4): 494-512 .

Boden, D. (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press .

Bowl, R. (1996) ‘Legislating for User Involvement in the United Kingdom: Mental Health Services and the NHS and Community Care Act 1990’ , International Journal of Social Psychiatry 42(3): 165-180 .

Carr, S. (2004) Has Service User Participation Made a Difference to Social Care Services? SCIE Position Paper No. 3. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence .

Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1992) ‘The Politics of Participation’ , Critical Social Policy 12(2): 20-44 .

10.

Croft, S. and Beresford, P. (1995) ‘Whose Empowerment? Equalizing the Competing Discourses in Community Care’, pp. 59-73 in R. Jack (ed.) Empowerment in Community Care. London: Chapman and Hall .

11.

Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press .

12.

Ferguson, I. (1997) ‘The Impact of Mental Health User Involvement’ , Research Policy and Planning 15: 26-30 .

13.

Forbes, J. and Sashidharan, S.P. (1997) ‘User Involvement in Services - Incorporation or Challenge?’ , British Journal of Social Work 27: 481-498 .

14.

Goffman, E. (1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin .

15.

Harrison, S. and Mort, M. (1998) ‘Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation’ , Social Policy and Administration 32(1): 60-70 .

16.

Johnstone, L. (2000) [first edition 1989] Users and Abusers of Psychiatry: A Critical Look at Psychiatric Practice. London: Routledge .

17.

Lindow, V. (1994) Self-help Alternatives to Mental Health Services. London: Mind .

18.

Lindow, V. and Morris, J. (1995) Service User Involvement: Synthesis of Findings and Experience in the Field of Community Care. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .

19.

Lindow, V. and Morris, J. (1999) Evaluation of the National User Involvement Project. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation .

20.

Milewa, T. , Dowswell, G. and Harrison, S. (2002) ‘Partnerships, Power and the “New” Politics of Community Participation in British Health Care’ , Social Policy and Administration 36(7): 796-809 .

21.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on the Use of Electroconvulsive Therapy. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence .

Participation,discourse and power: a case study in service user involvement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References