This article seeks to challenge understandings of partnership in order to reframe the discussion of common problems of partnership working. The very term partnership has become so common as to have no clear meaning beyond being a `nice' alternative to long tried and tested forms of governance. Yet failing to understand the complexities that are inherent in the very nature of partnership poses serious dilemmas for those engaged in such schemes. Addressing the key dilemmas identified in studies of a number of regeneration partnerships, this article suggests the need to understand the dynamics of partnerships in the context of extant forms of governance. In so doing, it suggests the possibility of overcoming old dilemmas, if only to confront new ones.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, L., Garber, J. and Seligman, M. (1980) `Learned Helplessness in Humans: An Attributional Analysis', pp. 3-34 in J. Garber and M. Seligman (eds) Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications. Orlando: Academic Press .
2.
Ashworth, C. (2000) `Changing Cultures and Building Shared Ownership' , Local Economy15(3): 256-261 .
Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (eds) (1991) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press .
5.
Byrne, D. (2001) `Partnership - Participation - Power: The Meaning of Empowerment in Post-industrial Society', pp. 243-259 in S. Balloch and M. Taylor (eds) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press .
Charnley, H. (2001) `Promoting Independence: A Partnership Approach to Supporting Older People in the Community', pp. 143-164 in S. Balloch and M. Taylor (eds) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press .
8.
Clarke, J. and Glendinning, C. (2002) `Partnership and the Remaking of Welfare Governance', pp. 33-50 in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press .
9.
Craig, G. and Taylor, M. (2002) `Dangerous Liaisons: Local Government and the Voluntary and Community Sectors', pp. 131-147 in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press .
10.
Davies, J. (2002) `Regeneration Partnerships under New Labour: A Case of Creeping Centralisation', pp. 167-182 in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press .
11.
DTLR (Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions) (2002) Strong Local Leadership - Quality Public Services. London: DTLR .
12.
Dunleavy, P. (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
Finn, D. (2001) `The Employment Service and PPPs', pp. 58-80 in E. Joseph and P. Robinson (eds) Right up Your Street: Partnerships for Local Policy Making and Delivery. London: IPPR .
15.
Foley, P. and Martin, S. (2000) `A New Deal for the Community? Public Participation in Regeneration and Local Service Delivery' , Policy and Politics28(4): 479-491 .
16.
Geddes, M. (2001) `Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom: A Stake in the Market', pp. 170-197 in M. Geddes and J. Benington (eds) Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union: New Forms of Local Social Governance? London: Routledge .
17.
Geddes, M. and Benington, J. (eds) (2001) `Social Exclusion and Partnership in the European Union', pp. 15-45 in Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union: New Forms of Local Social Governance? London: Routledge .
18.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
19.
Goss, S. (2001) Making Local Governance Work: Networks, Relationships and the Management of Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
20.
Granovetter, M. (1992) `Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness', pp. 53-81 in M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg (eds) The Sociology of Economic Life. Oxford: Westview Press .
21.
Hilditch, S. (2001) `Housing Investment and PPPs', pp. 34-57 in E. Joseph and P. Robinson (eds) Right up Your Street: Partnerships for Local Policy Making and Delivery. London: IPPR .
22.
Hirschman, A. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organisations and States. London: Harvard University Press .
23.
Huby, M. and Dix, G. (1992) Evaluating the Social Fund. London: HMSO .
24.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions. London: Sage .
25.
Levacic, R. (1993) `Markets as Coordinating Devices', pp. 30-50 in R. Maidment and G. Thompson (eds) Managing the United Kingdom. London: Sage .
26.
Lister, R. (2002) `A Politics of Recognition and Respect: Involving People with Experience of Poverty in Decision Making that Affects Their Lives' , Social Policy and Society1(1): 37-46 .
27.
Mackintosh, M. (1992) `Partnership: Issues of Policy and Negotiation' , Local Economy7(3): 210-224 .
28.
Mayo, M. (1997) `Partnerships for Regeneration and Community Development: Some Opportunities, Challenges and Constraints' , Critical Social Policy17(3): 3-26 .
29.
Mayo, M. and Anastacio, J. (1999) `Welfare Models and Approaches to Empowerment: Competing Perspectives from Area Regeneration Programmes' , Policy Studies20(1): 5-21 .
30.
Mayo, M. and Taylor, M. (2001) `Partnerships and Power in Community Regeneration', pp. 39-56 in S. Balloch and M. Taylor (eds) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press .
31.
Mitchell, J. (1993) `Coordination by Hierarchy', pp. 5-29 in R. Maidment and G. Thompson (eds) Managing the United Kingdom. London: Sage .
32.
National Audit Office (1991) The Social Fund. London: HMSO .
33.
Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage .
34.
Niskanen, W. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine .
35.
Partnership Council (2000) `Roles and Responsibilities', internal memorandum.
Powell, M. and Exworthy, M. (2002) `Partnerships, Quasi-networks and Social Policy', pp. 15-32 in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press .
38.
Powell, M., Exworthy, M. and Berney, L. (2001) `Playing the Game of Partnership', pp. 39-61 in R. Sykes, C. Bochel and N. Ellison (eds) Social Policy Review 13: Developments and Debates, 2000-2001. Bristol: Policy Press .
39.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) `The New Governance: Governing without Government' , Political Studies44(4): 652-667 .
40.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press .
41.
Rowe, M. (1999) `Joined-up Accountability: Bringing the Citizen Back in' , Public Policy and Administration14(2): 91-102 .
42.
Rowe, M. and Devanney, C. (2002) Nottingham's URBAN Programme: A Qualitative Evaluation of Projects. Nottingham: Nottingham Business School .
43.
Rowlinson, M. (1997) Organisations and Institutions. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
44.
Stewart, M. (2002) Collaboration and Co-ordination in Area-based Initiatives, NRU Research Report No. 1. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.
45.
Taylor, M. (2000) `Communities in the Lead: Power, Organisational Capacity and Social Capital' , Urban Studies37(5/6): 1019-1035 .
46.
Taylor, M. (2001) `Partnership: Insiders and Outsiders', pp. 94-107 in M. Harris and C. Rochester (eds) Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain: Perspectives on Change and Choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
47.
Thompson, G. (1993) `Network Coordination', pp. 51-74 in R. Maidment and G. Thompson (eds) Managing the United Kingdom. London: Sage .
48.
Toulemonde, J., Fontaine, C., Laudren, E. and Vincke, P. (1998) `Evaluation in Partnership: Practical Suggestions for Improving Their Quality' , Evaluation4(2): 171-188 .
49.
Tullock, G. (1965) The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press .
50.
Williamson, V. (2001) `The Potential of Project Status to Support Partnerships', pp. 117-141 in S. Balloch and M. Taylor (eds) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press .
