This article critically explores the distribution of rights and responsibilities associated with recent developments in genetic testing and DNA donation. The author identifies two key discourses in various accounts of genetics in the clinical and policy domains: patients' rights to informed choice and the public's right to involvement in policy decisions. However, other discourses among professionals, patients and members of the public around responsibilities for supporting genetic research and testing and managing their social implications are also present. The author goes on to argue that these discourses undermine the case for a dramatic difference between past eugenics and present genetics, as the prevention of genetic disease remains of paramount importance. This suggests that `new genetic citizenship' is not so new after all.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, J. and Lewis, G. (2002) `Citizenship, Medical Expertise and the Capitalist Regulatory State in Europe' , Sociology36: 67-88 .
2.
Barnes, C., Mercer, G. and Shakespeare, T. (1999) Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press .
3.
Barns, I., Schibeci, R., Davison, A. and Shaw, R. (2000) `What Do You Think about Genetic Medicine? Facilitating Sociable Public Discourse on Developments in the New Genetics' , Science, Technology and Human Values25(3): 283-308 .
4.
Biesecker, B. B. and Peters, K. F. (2001) `Process Studies in Genetic Counseling: Peering into the Black Box' , American Journal of Medical Genetics106(3): 191-198 .
5.
Burke, M. and Kolker, A. (1994) `Directiveness in Prenatal Genetic Counseling' , Women and Health22(2): 31-53 .
Clarke, A. (1995) `Population Screening for Genetic Susceptibility to Disease' , British Medical Journal311: 35-38 .
8.
Cunningham-Burley, S. and Kerr, A. (1999) `Defining the “Social”: Towards an Understanding of Scientific and Medical Discourses on the Social Aspects of the New Genetics' , Sociology of Health and Illness21(5): 647-668 .
9.
Davison, A., Barns, I. and Schibeci, R. (1997) `Problematic Publics: A Critical Review of Surveys of Public Attitudes to Biotechnology' , Science, Technology and Human Values22(3): 317-348 .
10.
Dunkerley, D. and Glasner, P. (1998) `Empowering the Public? Citizens' Juries and the New Genetic Technologies' , Critical Public Health8(3): 181-192 .
11.
Green, J. (1995) `Obstetricians' Views on Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination of Pregnancy: 1980 Compared with 1993' , British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology10(2): 228-232 .
12.
Hallowell, N. (1999a) `Advising on the Management of Genetic Risk: Offering Choice or Prescribing Action?' , Health, Risk and Society (special issue: `Risk and the New Genetics') 1(3): 267-280 .
13.
Hallowell, N. (1999b) `Doing the Right Thing: Genetic Risk and Responsibility', pp. 97-120 in P. Conrad and J. Gabe (eds) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford: Blackwell .
14.
Henn, W. (2000) `Consumerism in Prenatal Diagnosis' , Journal of Medical Ethics26(8): 444-446 .
15.
HGC (Human Genetics Commission) (2002) Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the Use of Personal Genetic Data. London: DoH .
16.
Irwin, A. (2001) `Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences' , Public Understanding of Science10(1): 1-18 .
17.
Johanson, R., Burr, R., Leighton, N. and Jones, P. (2000) `Informed Choice? Evidence of the Persuasive Power of Professionals' , Journal of Public Health Medicine22(3): 439-440 .
18.
Kenen, R. (1997) `Opportunities and Impediments for a Consolidating and Expanding Profession: Genetic Counselling in the United States' , Social Science and Medicine45: 1377-1386 .
19.
Kerr, A. and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2000) `On Ambivalence and Risk: Reflexive Modernity and the New Human Genetics' , Sociology34(2): 283-304 .
20.
Kerr, A. and Shakespeare, T. (2002) Genetic Politics: From Eugenics to Genome. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press .
21.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A. (1997) `The New Genetics: Professionals' Discursive Boundaries' , Sociological Review45(2): 279-303 .
22.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A. (1998a) `The New Human Genetics and Health: Mobilising Lay Expertise' , Public Understanding of Science7(1): 41-60 .
23.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A. (1998b) `Drawing the Line: An Analysis of Lay People's Discussions about the New Human Genetics' , Public Understanding of Science7(2): 113-133 .
24.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Amos, A. (1998c) `Eugenics and the New Human Genetics in Britain: Examining Contemporary Professionals' Accounts' , Science, Technology and Human Values23(2): 175-198 .
25.
Kevles, D. J. (1995) In the Name of Eugenics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
26.
Kitzinger, J. (forthcoming) `Constructing and Deconstructing the “Gay Gene”: Mass and Minority Discourses and Media Debates', in G. Ellison (ed.) Diversity, Difference and Deviance: Ethics and Human Biology. London: Routledge .
27.
Lippman, A. (1992) `Prenatal Genetic Testing and Genetic Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities' , American Journal of Law and Medicine17(2): 15-50 .
28.
Liu, J., Lissens, W., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I. and van Steirteghem, A. (1996) `Cystic Fibrosis, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis' , Human Reproductive Update2(6): 531-539 .
29.
Lupton, D. (1997) `Consumerism, Reflexivity and the Medical Encounter' , Social Science and Medicine45(3): 373-381 .
30.
Marteau, T. (1989) `Framing of Information: Its Influence upon Decisions of Doctors and Patients' , British Journal of Social Psychology29(2): 89-94 .
31.
Marteau, T., Plenicar, M. and Kidd, J. (1993) `Obstetricians Presenting Amniocentesis to Pregnant Women: Practice Observed' , Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology11(1): 3-10 .
32.
Marteau, T., Drake, H. and Bobrow, M. (1994) `Counselling Following Diagnosis of Foetal Abnormality: The Differing Approaches of Obstetricians, Clinical Geneticists, and Genetic Nurses' , Journal of Medical Genetics31(11): 863-867 .
33.
Novas, C. and Rose, N. (2000) `Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual' , Economy and Society (special issue: `Configurations of Risk') 29(4): 484-513 .
34.
Paul, D. (1992) `Eugenic Anxieties, Social Realities and Political Choices' , Social Research59(3): 663-683 .
35.
Petersen, A. (1999) `Counselling the Genetically “at-risk”: A Critique of “Non-directiveness” ' , Health, Risk and Society1(3): 253-266 .
36.
Petersen, A. and Bunton, R. (2002) The New Genetics and the Public's Health. London: Routledge .
37.
Pilnick, A. (2002) `There Are No Rights and Wrongs in these Situations: Identifying Interactional Difficulties in Genetic Counselling' , Sociology of Health and Illness25(1): 66-88 .
38.
Polzer, J., Mercer, S. L. and Goel, V. (2002) `Blood is Thicker than Water: Genetic Testing as Citizenship through Familial Obligation and the Management of Risk' , Critical Public Health12(2): 153-168 .
39.
Press, N. and Browner, C. H. (1997) `Why Women Say Yes to Prenatal Diagnosis' , Social Science and Medicine45(7): 976-989 .
40.
Rabeharisoa, V. and Callon, M. (2002) `The Involvement of Patients' Associations in Research' , International Social Science Journal54(1): 57-67 .
41.
Rabinow, P. (1996) `Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality', pp. 91-111 in Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
42.
Rabinow, P. (1999a) `Severing the Ties: Fragmentation and Redemption in Late Modernity', pp. 169-187 in D. Hess and L. Layne (eds) The Anthropology of Science and Technology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
43.
Rabinow, P. (1999b) French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
44.
Rapp, R. (2000) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. London: Routledge .
45.
Robertson, A. (2001) `Biotechnology, Political Rationality and Discourses on Health Risk' , Health5(3): 293-309 .
46.
Rose, N. (1990) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge .
47.
Rose, N. (1999) `The Biology of Culpability: Pathological Identity and Crime Control in a Biological Culture' , Theoretical Criminology4(1): 5-34 .
48.
Rose, N. (2001) `The Politics of Life itself' , Theory, Culture and Society18(6): 1-30 .
49.
Rutter, M. (2001) `Nature, Nurture, and Development: From Evangelism through Science towards Policy and Practice', SRCD presidential address (30 May).
50.
Shakespeare, T. (1999) `Losing the Plot? Medical and Activist Discourses of Contemporary Genetics and Disability' , Sociology of Health and Illness21(5): 669-688 .
51.
Wellcome Trust (2001) Report of the UK Population Biomedical Collection Protocol development workshop, Royal College of Physicians, London, 17 April. http://www.welcome.ac.uk.
52.
Wertz, D. C. and Gregg, R. (2000) `Genetics Services in a Social, Ethical and Policy Context: A Collaboration between Consumers and Providers' , Journal of Medical Ethics26(4): 261-265 .
53.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002a) ` “Drawing the Line” in Prenatal Screening and Testing: Health Practitioners' Discussions' , Health, Risk and Society4(1): 61-75 .
54.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002b) `Is Nondirectiveness Possible within the Context of Antenatal Screening and Testing?' , Social Science and Medicine54(3): 339-347 .
55.
Williams, C., Alderson, P. and Farsides, B. (2002c) `Too Many Choices? Hospital and Community Staff Reflect on the Future of Prenatal Screening' , New Genetics and Society20(3): 743-753 .
