US welfare reform eliminates social rights and caregiving as bases for making claims; it expands the role of the market; and it marks a shift in patterns of stratification toward gender `sameness', in that mothers and fathers must be employed. The expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit reinforces these changes, channelling resources to poor parents, but only if they are employed. These changes are explained with reference to changing balances of power and structural conditions, particularly long-term shifts in expectations about mothers' employment, including their racialized dimensions, situating such factors in the context of the policy legacy. Both the market-supporting character of the US policy regime and the articulation of feminist projects regarding women's employment helped create a context in which welfare reform was likely to require employment. The linkage of such requirements and the end of entitlement occurred in the context of Republican electoral victories, with a Democratic President committed to welfare reform. A feminist policy alternative would offer support for combining employment and caregiving, as both activities are critical for social and political participation; citizenship claims must be linked to employment to succeed politically.
Bell, W. (1965) Aid to Dependent Children. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Bergmann, B.R. (1986) The Economic Emergence of Women. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Bergmann, B. and Hartmann, H. (1995) `A Welfare Reform Based on Help for Working Parents' , Feminist Economics1: 85-9.
4.
Blank, R. (1997) It Takes a Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Boris, E. (1995) `The Racialized Gendered State: Constructions of Citizenship in the United States', Social Politics2: 160-80.
6.
Collins, P. Hill (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
7.
Corcoran, M., Sandra, D., Kalil, A. and Seefeldt, K. (2000) `How Welfare Reform Is Affecting Women's Work' , Annual Review of Sociology26: 241-69.
8.
Dawson, M. (1994) Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
DeParle, J. (1998) `Shrinking Welfare Rolls Leave Record High Share of Minorities', New York Times (electronic edn) 27 July. [www.nytimes.com]
10.
Dionne, E.J. (1998) `Up from the Bottom', Washington Post (electronic edn) 21 July. [www.washingtonpost.com ]
11.
Edin, K. and Lein, L. (1997) Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
Ellwood. D. (1999) `The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Social Policy Reforms on Work, Marriage and Living Arrangements', Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper 124. [http://www.jcpr.org/wp/WPprofile.cfm?ID=129]
13.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies . New York: Oxford University Press .
15.
Fineman, M. (1995) The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.
16.
Fraser, N. (1989) `Women, Welfare and the Politics of Need', pp. 144-60 in Unruly Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Fraser, N. (1994) `After the Family Wage: Gender Equality and the Welfare State', Political Theory22: 591-618.
18.
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1994) `A Geneology of "Dependency": Tracing a Keyword of the US Welfare State', Signs19: 309-36.
19.
Gilens, M. (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Glenn, E. Nakano (1992) `From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor', Signs18: 1-43.
21.
Gornick, J., Meyers, M. and Ross, K. (1997) `Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation across Fourteen Welfare States', Journal of European Social Policy7: 45-70.
22.
Hobson, B. (1994) `Solo Mothers, Social Policy Regimes and the Logics of Gender', pp. 170-87 in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.
23.
Howard, C. (1997) The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Kilkey, M. and Bradshaw, J. (1999) `Lone Mothers, Economic Well-being and Policies' , pp. 147-84 in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gender and Welfare State Regimes. London: Sage.
25.
Knijn, T. and Kremer, M. (1997) `Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship', Social Politics4: 328-61.
26.
Korpi, W. (2000) `Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States', Social Politics7: 127-91.
27.
Lieberman, R. (1998) Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
McCall, L. (2001) Complex Inequality: Gender, Class and Race in the New Economy. New York: Routledge .
29.
McLanahan, S. and Sandefur, G. (1994) Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Meyer, B.D. and Rosenbaum, D.T. (1998) `Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Employment of Single Mothers', Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper 2. [http://www.jcpr.org/labormothers.html]
31.
Michel, S. (1999) Children's Interests/Mothers' Rights: The Shaping of America's Child Care Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Millar, J. (1996) `Poor Mothers and Absent Fathers: Support for Lone Parents in Comparative Perspective', pp. 45-63 in H. Jones and J. Millar (eds) The Politics of the Family. Aldershot: Avebury.
33.
Mink, G. (1998) Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (1997) `Friedman's Revenge: The Reform of "Liberal" Welfare States in Canada and the United States', Politics and Society25: 443-72.
35.
Naples, N. (1997) `The "New Consensus" on the Gendered "Social Contract": The 1987-88 US Congressional Hearings on Welfare Reform', Signs22: 907-45.
36.
Nelson, B. (1990) `The Origins of the Two-channel Welfare State: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid', in L. Gordon (ed.) Women, the State and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
O'Connor, J., Orloff, A.S. and Shaver, S. (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Orloff, A.S. (1993a) The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
39.
Orloff, A.S. (1993b) `Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States', American Sociological Review58: 303-28.
40.
Pavetti, L. (1997) `How Much More Can they Work? Setting Realistic Expectations for Welfare Mothers'. Washington DC: The Urban Institute. [http://www.urban.org/welfare/howmuch.htm ]
41.
Pearce, D. (1986) `Toil and Trouble: Women Workers and Unemployment Compensation', pp. 141-62 in B. Gelpi, N. Hartsock, C. Novak and M. Strober (eds) Women and Poverty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Pierson, P. (1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Piven, F. Fox and Cloward, R. (1977) Poor People's Movements. New York: Vintage.
44.
Quadagno, J. (1994) The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Reich, R. (1999) `Clinton's Leap in the Dark', Times Literary Supplement (22 Jan.)4999: 3-4.
46.
Reskin, B. and Padavic, I. (1994) Women and Men at Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
47.
Rhodes, M. (1996) `Globalization and West European Welfare States: A Critical Review of Recent Debates', Journal of European Social Policy6: 305-27.
48.
Roberts, D. (1995) `Race, Gender and the Value of Mothers' Work', Social Politics2: 195-207.
49.
Skocpol, T. (1995) Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Spalter-Roth, R., Burr, B., Hartmann, H. and Shaw, L. (1995) Welfare that Works: The Working Lives of AFDC Recipients . Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
51.
Stevens, B. (1988) `Blurring the Boundaries: How the Federal Government Has Influenced Welfare Benefits in the Private Sector', pp. 123-48 in M. Weir, A. S. Orloff and T. Skocpol (eds) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
US Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives (1998) 1998 Green Book: Background Material and Data on Programs within the Jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
53.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (2000) `Change in TANF Caseloads since Enactment of New Welfare Law'. [ http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/stats/aug_dec.htm]
54.
Weaver, K. (1998) `Ending Welfare as We Know It: Policymaking for Low-income Families in the Clinton/Gingrich Era', pp. 361-416 in M. Weir (ed.) The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government. Washington, DC: Brookings.
55.
Weaver, K. (2000) Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington, DC: Brookings.
56.
Weir, M. (1992) The Politics of Jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Weir, M. (1995) `Poverty, Social Rights, and the Politics of Place in the United States', pp. 329-54 in S. Liebfried and P. Pierson (eds) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington, DC: Brookings.
58.
Weir, M. (ed.) (1998) The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government. Washington, DC: Brookings.
59.
Weir, M.,Orloff, A. S. and Skocpol, T. (eds) (1988) The Politics of Social Policy in the United States . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
Wennemo, I. (1994) Sharing the Costs of Children: Studies on the Development of Family Support in the OECD Countries. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research Dissertation Series No. 25.
61.
Williams, L.F. (1998) `Race and the Politics of Social Politics', pp. 417-63 in M. Weir (ed.) The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government. Washington, DC: Brookings.
62.
Women's Committee of 100 (2000) An Immodest Proposal: Rewarding Women's Work to End Poverty. [http://hermes.circ.gwu.edu/cgi_bin/wa?A2=ind0007A&L=welfarem_l&P=R62]
