Abstract
This article analyses recent developments in Britain in the use of formal and informal day care following the introduction of a National Child Care Strategy in 1997. It is argued that the government's focus on only supporting formal care ignores the crucial contribution made by the informal sector. A small study of the daycare arrangements of mature student parents compares the informal and formal daycare `markets' and shows how the firm line which government policy draws between formal and informal care is based on an incomplete understanding of the meaning of `care' and of `work'. The use of cash payments in the informal sector can sustain, rather than damage, the willingness and ability of carers to care — a choice does not have to be made between love and money. Rather, policies that support both are needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
