Accounting Standards Board (1991). Exposure Draft. Objective of Financial Statements and the Qualitative Characteristics of Financial Information. London.
2.
Accounting Standards Committee (1983). Review of the Standard Setting Process, London.
3.
Accounting Standards Committee (1988). Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 9—Accounting for Stocks and Work in Progress, London.
4.
Accounting Standards Steering Committee (1975). The Corporate Report, London.
5.
BaldwinR.McCruddenC. (1987). Regulation and Public Law, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
6.
BeaverW.H. (1981). Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
7.
BeresfordD.R. (1993). Frustrations of a Standard Setter, Accounting Horizons, December199370–76.
8.
BernsteinM.H. (1955). Regulating Business by Independent Commissions. Princetown University Press, Princetown, New Jersey.
9.
BirchA.H. (1964). Representative and Responsible Government, Allen and Unwin, London.
10.
BrealeyR.A.MyersS.C. (1991). Principles of Corporate Finance, 4th Edition, Mcgraw Hill, London.
11.
BromwichM. (1992). Financial Reporting, Information and Capital Markets, Pitman, London.
12.
Cadbury Report (1992). Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, London.
13.
CarsbergB.V.ArnoldJ.HopeA. (1977). Predictive Value: A Criterion for Choice of Accounting Method, In BaxterW.T., & Davidsons (eds) Studies in Accounting, 3rd Ed, ICAEW, London.
14.
CCAB (1988). The Making of Accounting Standards (The Dearing Report), London.
15.
Centre of Policy Studies (1982). Quangos—The Problem of Accountability. Monash University.
16.
ChatfieldM. (1977). A History of Accounting Thought, Krieger, New York.
17.
CoaseR. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, In StiglerG.BouldingK. (1952) Readings in Price Theory. Homewood, Illinois.
18.
DahlR.A. (1972). A Prelude to Corporate reform. Business and Society Review, Spring, 17–23.
19.
DayR.C. (1994). SSAP 22 and the Age of Compromise, Paper presented to the Annual Conference of Irish Accounting and Finance Association, The Queens’ University, Belfast.
20.
DunleavyP.O’LearyB. (1987). Theories and the State, MacmillanBasingstoke.
21.
DunsireA. (1978). Control in a Bureaucracy: The Executive Process, Martin Robinson, London.
22.
EdeyH.C.PanitpakdiP. (1956). British Company Accounting and the Law 1844–1900 In LittletonA.C.YameyB.S. eds, Studies in the History in Accounting, 356–379, Sweet and Maxwell, London.
23.
FASB (1978). SFAC 1, Objectives of Financial Reporting.
24.
FASB (1980). SFAC 2, Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information.
25.
FASB (1980). SFAC 3, Elements of Financial Statements of Business Enterprises. Stamford, Connecticut.
26.
Financial Accounting Foundation (1985). A Study of the Attitudes and an Assessment of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, Louis Harris & Associates, Stamford, Connecticut.
27.
Fulton Committee (1968). The Civil Service: Report of the Committee, Command Paper 3638.
28.
GoughJ.W. (1957). The Social Contract, Oxford University Press, London.
29.
GallhoferS.HaslamJ. (1993). Approaching Corporate Accountability. Fragments from the Past. Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 320–330.
30.
GrayR.OwenD.MaundersK. (1987). Corporate Social Reporting, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
31.
GrayR.OwenD.MaundersK. (1988). Corporate Social Reporting, Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 1(1) 6–20.
HoodC. (1979). The Machinery of Government Problem, Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.
35.
JenningsW.I. (1930). Cabinet Government., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36.
JensenM.MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behaviour Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics (October), 305–360.
37.
Joint Committee of Public Accounts (1988). Report 296, The Auditor-General: Ally of the People and Parliament, Canberra.
38.
JonesG.W. (1977). Responsibility in Government, London School of Economics, London.
39.
KeaseyK.WrightM. (1993). Issues in Corporate Accountability and Governance: An Editorial. Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 291–303.
40.
KleinR. (1974). The Doctor’s Dilema in Accountability. Public Administration Bulletin No 9, December.
41.
KleinR. (1973). Complaints Against Doctors. Charles Knight & Co, London.
42.
LemakD.J. (1985). Whatever Happened to the C.A.B.? in Daneke G.A. & Lemak D.J., Regulatory Reform Reconsidered. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
43.
MaystonD. (1993). Principals, Agents and the Economics of Accountability in the New Public Sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 6(3).
44.
MillJ.S. (1859). On Liberty. ed McCallumR.B., Oxford, 1946. MillJ.S. (1864). Considerations on Representative Government, ed McCallumR. B., Oxford1946.
45.
MillerP.B.W.ReddingR.J. (1988). The FASB The People, the Process the Politics, Irwin, Illinois (2nd edition).
46.
OliverD. (1991). Government in the United Kingdom. The Search for Accountability, Effectiveness and Citizenship. Open University Press.
47.
OrmrodP.CleaverK.C. (1993). Financial Reporting and Corporate Accountability, Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 431–439.
48.
OschinskyD. (1978). Medieval Treatises on Estate Accounting In LittletonA. C.YameyB.S., Studies in the History of Accounting, Arno Press.
49.
O’SullivanN. (1993). Auditors Liability: Its Role in the Corporate Governance Debate, Accounting and Business Research, 23(91A), 412–420.
50.
OwenD. (1992). Green Reporting: Accounting and the Challenge of the Nineties. Chapman Hall, London.
51.
Parliament House (1989). Accountability, Independence and Objectivity, Canberra.
52.
PerksR.W. (1993). Accounting and Society, Chapman Hall, London.
53.
PerksR.W.GeorgiouC. (1992). Financial Reporting Standard 1: A Fresh Start, Management Accounting, February, 39–54.
54.
PowerM. (1991). Auditing and Environmental Expertise; Between Protest and Professionalism, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 4(3), 30–42.
55.
ReaganM.C. (1987). Regulation—The Politics of Policy, Little Brown and Company, Boston.
56.
RhodesG. (1975). Committees of Enquiry, Allen and Unwin, London.
57.
RobertsJ.ScapensR. (1985). Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 10(4), 443–456.
58.
RobinsonD.Z. (1973). Government Contracting for Academic Research Accountability in the American Experience, In SmithB.L.R.HagueD.C. eds. Dilemma of Accountability, Macmillan, London.
59.
RoseR. (1985). Accountability to Electorates and the Market: the Alternatives for Public Organisations. Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.
60.
RoseR. (1976). On the Priorities of Government. European Journal of Political Research No 4, 247–289.
61.
SabineG.H. (1937). A History of Political Theory, Harrap. London.
62.
SealeyL.S.HooleyR.J.A (1994). Texts and Materials in Commercial Law, Butterworths, London.
63.
ShockerA.D.SethiS.P. (1973). An Approach to Incorporating Societal Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies, California Management Review, Summer, 97–105.
64.
SikkaP.PuxtyT.WillmotH.CooperC. (1992). Eliminating the Expectations Gap, ACCA, London.
65.
SmithB.C. (1980–81). Control in British Government: A Problem of Accountability. Policy Studies Journal, 9(8), 1163–1174.
66.
SmithB.L.R.HagueD.C. (1973). Dilemma of Accountability, Macmillan, London.
67.
StautsE.B. (1975). New Problems of Accountability for Federal Problems In SmithB.L.R. ed The New Political Economy; The Public Use of the Private Sector, MacmillanLondon.
68.
StewartJ.D. (1984). The Role of Information in Public Accountability In HopwoodA.TomkinsC. eds, Issues in Public Sector Accounting.
69.
StewartN.LongleyD. (1992). Accountability to the Public, European Policy Forum.
70.
TaylorP.TurleyS. (1986), The Regulation of Accounting, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
71.
TonkinD.J. (1983). The Professional Accounting Standard Setting Process in the UK. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Glasgow.
72.
TowerC. (1993). A Public Accountability Model of Accounting Regulation, British Accounting Review, 25(1), 61–85.