AkerlofG.A. (1997). “Social Distance and Social Decisions”, Econometrica, 65, 1005–1027.
2.
ArthurW.B. (1994). “Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality”, The American Economic Review, 84, 406–411.
3.
AumannR.J. (1997). “Rationality and Bounded Rationality”, Games and Economic Behaviour, 21, 2–14.
4.
BowlesS.GintisH, (1993). “The Revenge of Homo Economicus: Contested Exchange and the Revival of Political Economy”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 83–102.
5.
BuckleyP.J.ChapmanM. (1996). “Economics and Social Anthropology—Reconciling Differences”, Human Relations, 49, 1123–1150.
6.
BurnsT.R. (1994). “Two Conceptions of Human Agency: Rational Choice Theory and the Social Theory of Action” In SztompkaP. (ed) Agency and Structure, Amsterdam, Gordon and Breach, 197–249.
7.
CassonM. (1996). “Economics and Anthropology-Reluctant Partners”, Human Relations, 49, 1151–1180.
8.
ConliskJ. (1996). “Why Bounded Rationality?”Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 669–700.
9.
DouglasM. (1986). How Institutions Think, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.
GodelierM. (1972). Rationality and Irrationality in Economics, New York, Monthly Review Press.
11.
MirowskiP. (1986). “Institutions as a Solution Concept in a Game Theory Context” In SamuelsonL. (ed) Microeconomic Theory, Amsterdam, Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, 243–264.
12.
SchellingT.C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
13.
SchellingT.C. (1984). Choice and Consequence, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
14.
ShubikM. (1975). “The General Equilibrium Model is Incomplete and Not Adequate for the Reconciliation of Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Theory”, Kyklos, 28, 545–573.
15.
SimonH. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
16.
SjöstrandS-E. (1992). “On the Rationale behind ‘Irrational’ Institutions”, Journal of Economic Issues, 26, 1007–1040.
17.
Ullman-MargalitE. (1977). The Emergence of Norms, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
18.
Vorob’evN.N. (1994). Foundations of Game Theory, Berlin, Birkhauser Verlag.
