Neoclassical economists increasingly devise compelling, mathematically elegant hypotheses with dubious, to say the least, policy relevance. They are also most reluctant to engage in conversation with alternative paradigmatic schools (eg., feminists, Marxists, Institutionalists or Post-Keynesians). In doing so they have become intellectually incestuous, and unconcerned about being unaware of what they don’t know (defined as ignorance-squared).
Ignorance-squared does not merely imply a lack of knowledge, but also the possibility that it is being produced. It is argued that neoclassical economists, as traditional intellectuals, cultivate the social production of ignorance, and propagate it to their students, in the struggle for ideas. This is done through narrow pedagogy, delineation of research parameters, and by constraining the production and presentation of non-neoclassical knowledge. While a number of reasons exist for the intellectual narrowing of the discipline, one fundamental answer to the query “why is this the case?” may be found in the notion of ideological hegemony.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrowK.J. (1971). “The Firm in General Equilibrium Theory”, in MarrisR.WoodA. eds. (1971) The Corporate Economy, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
2.
ArrowK.J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, 29, June, 155–173.
BaumolW.J.BenhabibJ. (1989). “Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1) Winter, 77–105.
7.
BeedCliveBeedCara (1996). “Measuring the quality of academic journals: the case of economics”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 18(3), Spring, 369–396.
8.
BeckerW.E. (1975). “The university professor as a utility maximizer and producer of learning, research, and income”, Journal of Human Resources, 10, 107–115.
9.
BergerP.L.LuckmannT. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday.
10.
BlaugM. (1980). The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BloorD. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
BohmanJ. (1991). New Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
13.
BordieuP. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by NiceRichard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BrownE.K. (1981). “The Neoclassical and Post-Keynesian Research Programs: The Methodological Issues”, Review of Social Economy, 39(2) October, 438–459.
15.
CaldwellB.J. (1982). Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, London: Allen & Unwin.
16.
CaldwellB.J. (1988). “The Case for Pluralism”, in de MarchiN. (ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
CharneyD. (1993). “A study in rhetorical reading: How evolutionists read “The Sprandrels of San Marco”, in SelzerJ. ed., Understanding Scientific Prose, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 203–31.
18.
CollingridgeD. (1980). The Social Control of Technology, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19.
DaviesP.GribbinJ. (1992). The Matter Myth, London: Penguin Books.
20.
de MarchiN. ed. (1988). The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DebreuG. (1959). Theory of Value, New Haven, Connecticutt: Yale University Press.
22.
DobbM. (1975). Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FriedmanM. (1953). “The methodology of positive economics”, in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
FullerS. (1989). Philosophy of Science and its Discontents, Boulder: Westview Press.
26.
GansJ. (1991). “Chaos Theory, Nonlinearities, and Economics: A Speculative Note”, Economic Papers, 10(1), March, 40–53.
27.
GeertzC. (1973). “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”, in GeertzC., The Interpretation of Culture, New York: Basic Books.
28.
Georgescu-RoegenN. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by HoareQuentinSmithGeoffrey Nowell, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
30.
HahnF. (1982). “On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics”, in HahnF.Macroeconomics and Equilibrium, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
HallR.L.HitchC.J. (1939). “The theory of business behavior”, Oxford Economic Papers, May, 12–45.
32.
HarcourtG.C. (1975). Capital Theory: Much Ado About Something, London: Thames Papers in Political Economy.
33.
HardingS.G. ed. (1976). Can Theories be Refuted?, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
34.
HausmanD.M. (1989). “Economic Methodology in a Nueshell”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2) Spring, 115–127.
35.
HelpmanE. (1984). “Increasing Returns, Imperfect Markets, and Trade Theory”, in R.W. and Kenen, P.B. eds. Handbook of International Economics, Volume 2, New York: North-Holland.
36.
HelpmanE.KrugmanP. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
HicksJ.R. (1939). Value and Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
HogarthR.RederM. eds. (1987). Rational Choice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
JonesR.W.KenenP.B. eds. (1984). Handbook of International Economics, Volume 2, New York: North-Holland.
41.
KahnA. (1959). “Pricing objectives in large corporations: Comment”, American Economic Review, 49, 670–680.
42.
KaldorN. (1981). “The Role of Increasing Returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade and Economic Growth”, Economic Applique, 34(4), 593–617.
43.
KaplanA.DirlamJ.LanzillottiR. (1958). Pricing in Big Business, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
44.
KerwinA. (1993). “None Too Solid: Medical Ignorance”, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15(2) December, 166–185.
45.
KornaiJ. (1971). Anti-Equilibrium, New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company.
46.
KruegerA.O. (1991). “Report of the commission on graduate education in economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3) September, 1035–53.
47.
KruglanskiA.W. (1991). “Social Science-Based Understandings of Science: Reflections on Fuller”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 21(2) June, 223–231.
48.
KrugmanP. (1986). Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
49.
KurdasC.MajewskiR. (1994). “The rhetoric of a profession and path dependency. Can economists have their theory and free speech too?”, Review of Political Economy, 6(3), 337–355.
50.
LatsisS. ed. (1976). Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
LesterR. (1946). “Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage-employment problems”, American Economic Review, 36, 63–82.
52.
MachlupF. (1946). “Marginal analysis and empirical research”, American Economic Review, 36, September, 519–554.
MarrisR.WoodA. eds. (1971). The Corporate Economy, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
55.
MarxK. (1976). Manifesto of the Communist Party, in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, 1845–1848, Volume 6, London: Lawrence & Wishart (originally published 1848).
McCloskeyD.N. (1995), “Modern Epistemology Against Analytic Philosophy: A Reply to Mäki”, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIII(3) September, 1319–1323.
58.
McCloskeyD.N. (1986). The Rhetoric of Economics, Sussex: Harvester Press.
59.
MeansG. (1935). “Industrial prices and their relative inflexibility”, Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
60.
MonkR. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London: Vintage.
61.
MuellerD. (1992). “The corporation and the economist”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 147–170.
62.
NegishiT. (1962). “The Stability of a Competitive Economy: A Survey Article”, Econometrica, 30, 635–669.
63.
NitzanJ.BichlerS. (1995). “Bringing capital accumulation back in: the Weapondollar-Petrodollar Coalition—military contractors, oil companies and Middle East ‘energy conflicts’, Review of International Political Economy, 2(3) Summer, 446–515.
64.
NorthD.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ParkinF. (1971). “Class Inequality and Meaning Systems”, in ParkinF., Class Inequality and Political Order, New York: Praeger.
66.
Plato (1956). Euthyphro, Apology; Crito and the Death Scene from Phaedo, Translated by ChurchF.J., New York: The Liberal Arts Press.
67.
PopperK.R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchison.
68.
PopperK.R. (1983). Realism and the Aim of Science, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.
69.
RandA. (1952). The Fountainhead, New York: Signet Books.
70.
RandA. (1957). Atlas Shrugged, New York: Signet Books.
71.
RavetzJ.R. (1993). “The Sin of Science”, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15(2) December, 157–165.
72.
RobinsonJ. (1980). “Time in Economic Theory”, Kyklos, 33, 219–229.
73.
RobinsonJ. (1987). “The Meaning of Capital” in Contributions to Modern Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
74.
RomerP.M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
75.
SamuelsW.J. (1996). “On the Structure of the Archaeology of Economic Thought in the Eighteenth Century”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 7(4), 291–313.
76.
SamuelsonP.A. (1947). The Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
77.
SandvenT. (1995). “Intentional Action and Pure Causality: A Critical Discussion of Some Central Conceptual Distinctions in the Work of Jon Elster”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 25(3) September, 286–317.
78.
SavitR. (1988) “When Random is Not Random: An Introduction to Chaos in Market Prices”, Journal of Futures Markets, 8(3), 271–289.
79.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1976). Socialism and Democracy, London: George Allen and Unwin.
80.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1941). “Alfred Marshall’s Principles: A Semi-Centennial Appraisal”, American Economic Review, 31, June, 226–48.
81.
ScottJ. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
82.
SelzerJ. ed. (1993). Understanding Scientific Prose, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
83.
SimonH.A. (1976). “From substantive to procedural rationality”, in LatsisS. ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SmithsonM. (1989). Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms, New York: Springer-Verlag.
TolstoyL. (1967). “The Death of Ivan Ilych”, in Great Short Works of Leo Tolstoy, introduction by BayleyJohn, translated by Louise and Aylmer Maude, New York: Harper & Row, 247–302.
87.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1987). “Rational choice and the framing of decisions”, in HogarthR.RederM. eds., Rational Choice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 67–94.
88.
WaldropM. Mitchell (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
89.
WeinbergS. (1992). Dreams of a Final Theory, New York: Pantheon Books, 1992.
90.
WeintraubE.R. (1991). “Surveying dynamics”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(4), Summer, 525–543.
91.
WibleJ.R. (1995). “Of clouds and clocks and Keynes: conceptions of reality and the growth of knowledge function of money”, Review of Political Economy, 7(3), 294–323.
92.
YoungA. (1969). “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress”, in ArrowK.J.ScitovskyT. eds. Readings in Welfare Economics, Homewood, Ill: Irwin Publishers.
93.
ZarnowitzV. (1985). “Recent Work on Business Cycles in Historical Perspective: A Review of Theories and Evidence”, Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 523–580.
