In this paper I discuss two questions which the decision maker has to consider before she makes use of the method of cost benefit analysis. First, she has to ask herself if she shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost benefit analysis. If not, could environmental cost benefit analysis be adjusted such that her ethical beliefs are incorporated? Second, if the decision maker shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost-benefit analysis, is this method appropriate when there are individuals in a society that hold other ethical beliefs than those implicitly assumed in an environmental cost-benefit analysis? When discussing these questions I focus on two different perspectives – the deontological and the agency aspect of individual preferences. I argue that the answer to both questions is «no», though the answer to the second question is not as clear as the answer to the first.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. (1993). The Emperor’s Old Clothes: The Curious Comeback of Cost-benefit Analysis. Environmental Values, 2, 247–260.
2.
BrekkeK.A. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. On the Measurement of Income and Welfare. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. In progress.
3.
BrennanA. (1992). Moral Pluralism and the Environment. Environmental, 1, 15–33.
4.
BrennanA. (1995). Ethics, ecology and economics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 798–811.
5.
CommonM.S.BlaymeyR.K.NortonT.W. (1993). Sustainability an Environmental Valuation. Environmental Values, 2, 299–334.
6.
DavisN. (1991). Contemporary deontology. In SingerP. (ed.): A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell.
7.
DesvousgesW.H.JohnsonF.R.DunfordR.W.BoyleK.J.HudsonS.P.WilsonK.N. (1993). Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Test of Validity and Reliability. In Hausman (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment. North Holland.
8.
DiamondP.A.HausmanJ.A. (1993). On Contingent Valuation Measurement of Nonuse Values. In Hausman (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment. North-Holland.
9.
DiamondP.A.HausmanJ.A.LeonardG.K.DenningM.A. (1993). Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence. In Hausman (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment. North Holland.
10.
DiamondP.A.HausmanJ.A. (1994). Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.
11.
ElsterJ. (1986). The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory. In Elster and Hylland (eds.): Foundations of social Choice Theory, Cambridge University Press.
12.
ElsterJ.RoemerJ.E. (eds.) (1991). Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being. Cambridge University Press.
13.
FreemanA.M. (1986). The ethical basis of the economic view of the environment. In van der VeerD.PierceC. (eds.): People, Penguins and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues in Environmental Ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
14.
HanemannW.M. (1991). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How much can they differ?The American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647.
15.
HanemannW.M. (1994). Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. Journal of Economic perspectives, 8(4), 19–43.
16.
HanleyN.SpashC. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
17.
KahnemanD. (1986). Comments on the Contingent Valuation Method. In CummingsR.G.BrookshireD.S.SchultzeW.D. (eds): Valuing Environmental Goods. Rowman and Allanheld, Totawa, NJ.
18.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.L. (1992). Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57–70.
19.
KelmanS. (1986). Cost Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique. In van der VeerD.PierceC. (eds.): People, Penguins and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues in Environmental Ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
20.
KnetschJ.L. (1994). Environmental Valuation: Some Problems of Wrong Questions and Misleading Answers. Environmental, 3, 351–368.
21.
KrutillaJ. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review, 56, 777–786.
22.
MilgromP. (1993). Is Sympathy an Economic value? Philosophy, Economics, and the Contingent Valuation Method. In Hausman (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment. North-Holland.
23.
NozickR. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Blackwell, Oxford.
NæssA. (1984). A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement. Environmental Ethics, 6(3).
26.
PearceD.W.TurnerR.K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
27.
PenceG. (1991). Virtue Theory. In SingerP. (ed.): A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell.
28.
PortneyP.R. (1994). The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3–17.
29.
SagoffM. (1988). The economy of the earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SchkadeD.A.PayneJ.W. (1993). Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions. In Hausman (ed.): Contingent Valuation. A Critical Assessment. North-Holland.
31.
Schrader-FrechetteK. (1985). The Real Risks of Risk-cost-benefit Analysis. In: Technology and Society, 7, 399–409
32.
SeipK.StrandJ. (1992). Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods In Norway: A Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 91–106.
33.
SessionsG. (ed.) (1995). Deep-Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Shambhala.
34.
SenA. (1979). Utilitarianism and welfarism. Journal of Philosophy, 76.
35.
SenA. (1982b). Rational Fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In Choice welfare and measurement. OxfordBlackwell, and Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.
36.
SenA. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82.
37.
SenA. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Blackwell, Oxford.
38.
SenA. (1995). Rationality and Social Choice. The American Economic Review, 85(1), 1–24.
39.
SingerP. (1986). All animals are equal. In SingerP. (ed.): Applied ethics. Oxford University Press.
40.
SmullyanR. (1980). The Book Needs No Title. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
41.
StiglitzJ.E. (1988). Economics of the Public Sector. W. W. Norton & Company, New York and London.
42.
SunsteinC.R. (1991). Preferences and Politics. Philosophy and public Affairs, 20(1), 3–34.
43.
TverskyA. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352.
44.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of business, 59, 251–278.
45.
VadnjalD.O’ConnorM. (1994). What is the Value of Rangitoto Island?Environmental, 3(4), 370–380.
