There has been a number of attempts to interpret John Stuart Mill’s recantation from the Wages Fund doctrine in 1869. This article attempts to analyze the recantation using a framework which takes account of the development and decline of the wages fund doctrine as a whole. The framework is based on the work of Imre Lakatos and the article aims to rationally reconstruct the history of Mill’s recantation. It is argued that while external events were responsible for focusing attention on trades union matters in the 1860s Mill’s recantation and the aftermath can be accounted for in terms of theoretical weaknesses with the doctrine and its failure to make theoretical progress.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlaugM. (1985). Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th. edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2.
BreitW. (1967). “The Wages Fund Controversy Revisited”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 33(4), 511–528.
3.
CairnesJ.E. (1874). Some Leading Principle of Political Economy Newly Expounded, MacMillan, London.
4.
CairnesJ.E. (1875). Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, London.
5.
DunningT. (1860). Trades Unions and Strikes: Their Philosophy and Intention, London.
6.
EkelundR.B. (1976). “A Short Run Classical Model of Capital and Wages: Mill’s Recantation of the Wages Fund”, Oxford Economic Papers, 28(1), March, 66–86.
7.
EkelundR.B. (1985). “Mill’s Recantation Once Again: Reply to Professor Negishi”, Oxford Economic Papers, 37, 152–153.
8.
EkelundR.B.KordsmeierW.F. (1981). “J.S. Mill, Unions, and the Wages Fund Recantation: A Reinterpretation—Comment”Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 531–541.
9.
EkelundR.B.OlsenE.S. (1973). “Comte, Mill, and Cairnes: The Posivist Empiricist Interlude in Late Classical Economics, Journal of Economic Issues, VII(3), September, 383–416.
10.
FawcettH. (1858). “The Theory and Tendencies of Strikes”, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 635–640.
11.
FawcettH. (1860). “Strikes: Their Tendencies and Remedies”Westminster Review, XVIII, July1st, 1–23.
12.
ForgetE.L. (1990). “J.S. Mill and the Tory School: the Rhetorical Value of the Recantation”, paper presented at the History of Economics Society Conference, Washington and Lee University, Virginia.
13.
FultonG. (1984). “Research Programmes in Economics”, History of Political Economy, 16(2), 187–205.
14.
GordonS. (1973). “The Wages Fund Controversy: The Second Round”, History of Political Economy, 5, Spring. 14–35.
15.
HollanderS. (1974). “J.S. Mill on ‘Derived Demand’ and the Wage Fund Recantation”, Eastern Economic Journal, X(1), January-March.
16.
HollanderS. (1979). The Economics of David Ricardo, Heinemann, London.
17.
JenkinF. (1868). “Trades Unions: How Far Legitimate”, North British Review, March, reprinted in Papers, Literary, Scientific, &c., edited by ColvinS.EwingJ. A., Longmans, Green and Co., 1887.
18.
LakatosI. (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in LakatosI.MusgraveA., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, CUP, Cambridge.
19.
Lakatos (1976). Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20.
LeijohnhufvudA. (1976). “Schools, ‘Revolutions’, and Research Programmes in Economic Theory”, in LatsisS.J., (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, CUP, Cambridge.
21.
LeslieT.E.C (1868). “Political Economy and the Rate of Wages”, Frazer’s Magazine, July, reprinted in LeslieT.E.C.. Land Systems and Industrial Economy, Longmans, London, 1870, 357–379.
22.
LongeF.D. (1866). A Refutation of the Wages Fund Theory of Modern Political Economy as enunciated by Mr. Mill and Mr. Fawcett, LongmansM.P.,, Green and Co., London.
23.
MalthusT.R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, 1st Edition, London.
24.
MalthusT.R. (1820). Principles of Political Economy, London.
25.
MarcetJ. (1816). Conversations on Political Economy, in which the Elements of that Science are Familiarly Explained, Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, London.
26.
McCullochJ.R. (1825). Principles of Political Economy, Ward, Lock & Co, London.
27.
MillJ.S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy, vols II and III of Collected Works, edited by RobsonJ. M.Toronto, 1965.
28.
MillJ.S. (1869). “Thornton on Labour and its Claims”, Fortnightly Review, May, June, 505–518, 680–700.
29.
MillJ.S. (1972). The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873, XVII, of Collected Works, Toronto.
30.
NegishiT. (1985). “Comments on Ekelund ‘Mill’s Recantation of the Wages Fund’ “, Oxford Economic Papers, 37, 148–151.
31.
NegishiT. (1986). “Thornton’s Criticism of Equilibrium Theory and Mill”, History of Political Economy, 18(4), 567–577.
32.
RathboneP.H. (1867), “The Moral of the Sheffield Outrages”, Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, 692–693.
33.
RicardoD. (1817). Principles of Political Economy, Edited by SraffaP., Vol. I of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1951.
34.
SchwartzP. (1968). The New Political Economy of J.S. Mill, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.
35.
SeniorN. (1830). Three Lectures on the Rate of Wages, John Murray, London.
36.
SmithA. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by CampbellR. H.SkinnerA. S.; vol II of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford1976; reprinted by Liberty Classics, Indianapolis, 1981.
37.
StiglerG.J. (1868). “Mill on Economics and Society”, University of Toronto Quarterly, 38, October, 96–101.
38.
ThorntonW.T. (1869). On Labour: Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Dues, Its Actual Present and Possible Future, 1st Edition, London.
39.
VintJ. (1991). “The ‘Rigid’ Wages Fund Doctrine: McCulloch, Mill and the ‘Monster’ of Money”, in BarberW. J. (ed) Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought, Edward Elgar, London.
40.
VintJ. (1992). “Thornton and Mill on the Supply and Demand of Commodities: a Lakatosian View”International Journal of New Ideas, I(2).
41.
VintJ. (1994). Capital and Wages: A Lakatosian History of the Wages Fund Doctrine, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
42.
WalkerF.A. (1875). “The Wage-Fund Theory”, North American Review, 120, January, 84–119.
43.
WalkerF.A. (1876). The Wages Question: A Treatise on Wages and the Wages Class, MacMillan, London.
44.
WhitakerJ.K. (1975). The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 1, The Royal Economic Society, MacMillan, London.
