This paper comprehensively analyses the logical problems involved in conventional tests of economic theories. It also outlines some methodological problems with current econometric practice. An alternative test procedure which constitutes a logically complete and rigorous extension of conventional test procedures is proposed in order to attenuate some of the problems identified. The test is implemented in a practical context by considering the debate over the inclusion of real money balances in the neoclassical aggregate production function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgassiJ. (1963). Towards an Historiography of Science, History and Theory, Beiheft 2. The Hague Mouton.
2.
AgassiJ. (1971). “Tautology and Testability in Economics”, Philosophy of Social Sciences, 49–63.
3.
ArchibaldG.C. (1959). “Testing Marginal Productivity Theory” in Review of Economic Studies, 210–213.
4.
ArchibaldG.C. (1979). “Method and Appraisal in Economics”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 304–315.
5.
BaileyM.J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level: A Study in Macroeconomic Theory (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BennettR.E. (1981). An Empirical Test of Some Post-Keynesian Income Distribution Theories. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
7.
Ben-ZionU.RuttanV.W. (1975). “Money in the Production Function: An Interpretation Empirical Results”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 246–247.
8.
BlaugM. (1980). The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BolandL.A. (1977). “Testability in Economic Science”, South African Journal of Economics, 93–105.
10.
BolandL.A. (1979). “A Critique of Friedman’s Critics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 503–522.
11.
BolandL.A. (1981). “On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis”, American Economic Review, 1031–1036.
12.
BolandL.A. (1982). The Foundations of Economic Method. London: George Allen & Unwin.
13.
Boyes and Kavanaugh, D.C. (1979). “Money and the Production Function: A Test for Specification Errors”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 442–446.
14.
ButterfieldD.W. (1975). Money as a Productive Factor: A Study of Business Balances. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
15.
CaldwellB. (1982). Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: George Allen & Unwin.
16.
CarnapR. (1934). The Logical Syntax of Language (translated by SmeatonA.). New York: Harcourt, Brace (1937).
17.
CarnapR. (1936, 1937). “Testability and Meaning”, Philosophy of Science Vol. 3 (1936), pp. 420–468; ibid., 4(1937), 1–40.
18.
CarnapR. (1967). The Logical Structure of the World: Pseudoproblems in Philosophy (translated by GeorgeR. A.). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
19.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W. (1969). “The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929–1967”, Review of Income and Wealth, 293–320.
20.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W. (1970). “U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input, 1929–1967”, Review of Income and Wealth, 19–50.
21.
CooleyT.F.LeroyS.F. (1981). “Identification and Estimation of Money Demand”, American Economic Review, 825–844.
22.
CrossR. (1982). “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics”, The Economic Journal, 320–340.
23.
DornbuschR.FischerS. (1978). Macroeconomics. New York: McGraw Hill.
24.
DuhemP. (1906). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (translated by WeinerP.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
EarmanJ. (ed.) (1983). Testing Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
FeyerabendP. (1975). Against Method: Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge. London:
27.
FinnertyJ.D. (1980). “Real Money Balances and the Firm’s Production Function”, Journal of Money, Credit & Banking, 666–671.
28.
FischerS. (1974). “Money and the Production Function”, Economic Inquiry, 517–533.
29.
FriedmanM. (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics” in FriedmanM.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
FriedmanM. (1959). “The Demand for Money: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results”, Journal of Political Economy, 327–351.
31.
FriedmanM.SchwartzA.J. (1970). Monetary Statistics of the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
GlymourC. (1980). Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
HardingS. (1976). Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Dodrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
HarveyA.C. (1981). The Econometric Analysis of Time Series. Deddington: Phillip Allan.
36.
HausmanD. (1981). Capital, Profits and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
HausmanD. (1983a). “Are There Causal Relations Among Dependent Variables”?Philosophy of Science, 58–81.
38.
HausmanD. (1983b). “The Limits of Economic Science”, in RescherN. (ed.) The Limits of Lawfulness: Studies on the Scope and Nature of Scientific Knowledge, 93–100. Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 1983.
39.
HendryD.F. (1980). “Econometrics: Alchemy or Science”?Economica, 387–406.
40.
HendryD.F. (1981). “Predictive Failure and Econometric Modelling in Macroeconomics: The Transactions Demand for Money”, in OmerodP. (ed.) Modelling for Economy, 217–242. London: Heinemann.
41.
HendryD.F. (1983). “Econometric Modelling: The Consumption Function in Retrospect”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 193–220.
42.
HumeD. (1748/1955). An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, reprint, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
43.
JensenK.C.KamathS.J.BennettR.E. (1987). “Money in the Production Function. An Alternative Test Procedure”, Eastern Economic Journal, Jul-Sep. 1987.
44.
JohnsonH.G. (1967). “Money in a Neoclassical One Sector Growth Model”, in JohnsonH. G.Essays in Monetary Economics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
45.
JohnsonH.G. (1969). “Inside Money, Outside Money, Income, Wealth and Welfare in Monetary Theory”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30–45.
46.
KendallM.G. (1968). “The History of Statistical Methods” in International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. SillsD.S. (ed.), 224–232 V. 15. New York: MacMillan and the Free Press.
47.
KhanM.S.KouriP.J.K (1975). “Real Money Balances as a Factor of Production: A Comment”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 244–246.
48.
KuhnT. (1970). “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, II(2), 2nd enlarged edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
LakatosI. (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in LakatosI.MusgraveA. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
LeamerE. (1978). Specification Searches. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
51.
LeamerE. (1983). “Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics”, American Economic Review, 31–43.
52.
LevhariD.PatinkinD. (1968). “The Role of Money in a Simple Growth Model”, American Economic Review, 713–753.
53.
LloydC. (1965). “On the Falsifiability of Traditional Demand Theory”, Metroeconomica, 17–23.
54.
LloydC. (1980). “Some Conceptual Issues in the Testing of the Economic Theory of Consumer Demand”, in Advances in Consumer Researcher, 2, 1974. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Cliff Lloyd. Burnaby, B.C.: Simon Fraser University School of Business Administration and Economics.
55.
LovellM.C. (1983). “Data Mining”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–12.
56.
MayerT. (1980). “Economics as a Hard Science: Realistic Goal or Wishful Thinking”?Economic Inquiry, 165–178.
57.
McGregorL.WaltersA.A. (1973). “Real Balances and Output: A Productivity Model of a Monetary Economy”, in PowellA. A.WilliamsR. W. (eds.) Econometric Studies of Macro and Monetary Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 233–259.
58.
MoroneyJ.R. (1972). “The Current State of Money and Production Theory”, American Economic Review, 335–345.
59.
NadiriM.I. (1970). “The Determinants of Real Cash Balances in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 173–196.
60.
NiccoliA. (1975). “Real Money: An Omitted Variable from the Production Function?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 241–243.
61.
PopperK. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Harper & Row.
62.
PraisZ. (1975a). “Real Money Balances as a Variable in the Production Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 243–244.
63.
PraisZ. (1975b). “Real Money Balances as a Variable in the Production Function: A Comment”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 535–544.
64.
QuineW.V.O (1951). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, Philosophical Review, reprinted in QuineW.V.O.From a Logical Point of View, 20–24. New York: Harper & Row, 1961
65.
RollR. (1977). “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests, Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory”, Journal of Financial Economics, 129–176.
66.
SavingT.R. (1972). “Transaction Costs and the Demand for Money”, American Economic Review, 407–420.
67.
ShortE.D. (1979). “A New Look at Real Balances as a Variable in the Production Function”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 326–339.
68.
SinaiA.StokesH.H. (1972). “Real Money Balances: An Omitted Variable from the Production Function?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 290–296.
69.
SinaiA.StokesH.H. (1975). “Real Money Balances: An Omitted Variable from the Production Function?: A Reply”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 247–251.
70.
SinaiA.StokesH.H. (1980). “Real Balances as a Variable in the Production Function: A Further Reply”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 372–373.
71.
SinaiA.StokesH.H. (1981). “Money and the Production Function: A Reply to Boyes and Kavanaugh”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 313–318.
72.
TarascioV.CaldwellB. (1979). “Theory Choice in Economics: Philosophy and Practice”, Journal of Economic Issues, 983–1006.
