The purpose of this paper is to briefly trace the main protagonists who have contributed to defining and measuring wealth, starting from the Stone Age up until the present day. It illustrates the changing nature of knowledge production in forming crucial concepts, where different economic theorists utilised different definitions and evaluations. These different economic theories, while defining economies, highlight a more important issue of recognising that the neoclassical concept that exists today is not an incontestable concept reflective of the present day economy, but a theoretical proposition that can be subject to change and alternative formulation. This continues to this very day with the onset of the knowledge revolution, and issues of environmental sustainability and social development. These all form an important part of wealth measurement but do not avail themselves to a study under the traditional economic theory. This limitation needs to be set against the pattern exhibited throughout this paper, namely, that wealth measurements were transformed in response to a need, to make them more appropriate to the actual facts of a changing, complex economic situation. It is no different now. The awareness of this factor is what makes an historical narrative of wealth and its measurement so important. By demonstrating this, it permits approaches to economics from a standpoint other than neoclassical.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2006). Measures of Australia’s Progress 2006, cat. no. 1370.0, ABS, Canberra.
2.
BloomfieldI.A. (1938). ‘The Foreign-Trade Doctrine of the Physiocrats’, American Economic Review, 28(4), 716–735.
3.
BoisguilbertP. (1697). Le Detail de la France, in HechtJ (ed.), 1966, Pierre de Boisguilbert ou la Naissance de L’economie Politique, Institut National d’Etudes Demographiques, Paris, 581–662.
4.
BriefsG.A. (1941). ‘The Economic Philosophy of Romanticism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 2(3), 279–300.
5.
CantillonR. (1734). Essai Sur La Nature du Commerce en General, 1931 edn, ed. & trans. HiggsH., Macmillan, London.
6.
CassisY.MinoglouI. (2005). Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
7.
ChoudhuryM.A. (1999). ‘The Structure of Islamic Economics: A Comparative Perspective on Markets, Ethics and Economics’, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 3(1), 61–97.
8.
CobbC.W.GoodmanG.S.WackernagelM. (1999). Why Bigger Isn’t Better: The Genuine Progress Indicator – 1999 Update, Redefining Progress, San Francisco.
9.
CobbC.W.HalsteadT.RoweJ. (1995). ‘If GDP Is Up Why Is America Down?’, Atlantic Monthly, 276(4), 59–78.
10.
CondillacE. Bonnot de (1776). La Commerce et le Gouvernement Consideres Realtivement L’un a L’autre, Paris.
EarleT.K. (2002). Bronze Age Economics: The Beginnings of Political Economies, Westview Press, Colorado.
13.
Ezekiel, ‘Verse 7: 19–20’, Good News Bible, 1979 edn, ed. Catholic Study, Thomas Nelson Publishers, New York, 829.
14.
Genesis, ‘Verse 14: 18–20’, Good News Bible, 1979 edn, ed. Catholic Study, Thomas Nelson Publishers, New York, 13.
15.
GerthH.H.WrightMills, C. (1991). ‘A Bibliographical View’, in GerthH.H.MillsC. Wright (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Routledge, London, 3–31.
16.
GilbertM. (1942). ‘Measuring National Income as Affected by the War’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 37(218), 186–198.
17.
GordonB.J. (1964). ‘Aristotle and the Development of Value Theory’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 78(1), 115–128.
18.
HullC.H. (ed.) (1899). The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty: Together with the Observations Upon the Bills of Mortality, 1, University Press, Cambridge.
19.
JacksonT.RobertsP. (1997). ‘Greening the Fife Economy: Ecological Modernization as a Pathway for Local Economic Development’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 40(5), 615–629.
20.
JacksonT.RobertsP. (2000). ‘A Review of Indicators of Sustainable Development: A Report for Scottish Enterprise Tayside’, Report prepared for Scottish Enterprise Tayside, University of Dundee, Dundee.
21.
JevonsW.S. (1881). ‘Richard Cantillon and the Nationality of Political Economy’, The Contemporary Review39, 61–80.
22.
KendrickJ.W. (1970). ‘The Historical Development of National Income Accounts’, History of Political Economy, 2(2), 284–315.
23.
KendrickJ.W. (1996). ‘Introduction and Overview’, The New System of National Accounts, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1–24.
24.
KeynesJ.M.StoneR. (1940). ‘The National Income and Expenditure of the United Kingdom, and How to Pay for the War’, cited in CobbCWHalsteadT.RoweJ., ‘If GDP is Up Why is America Down?’, Atlantic Monthly, 1995, 276(4), 59–78.
25.
KushnirskyF.StullW. (1989). ‘Productive and Unproductive Labour: Smith, Marx and the Soviets’, in WalkerD (ed.), Classical and Neoclassical Economic Thought: Selected Papers from the History of Economics Society Conference, 1, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, 82–103.
26.
KuznetsS.S. (1941). National Income and Its Composition 1919–1938, 1–2, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
27.
KuznetsS.S. (1962). ‘How to Judge Quality’, The New Republic, October20, 29–32.
28.
LaistnerM.L.W. (1923). Greek Economics, JM Dent, London.
29.
LangholmO. (1992). Economics in the Medieval Schools: Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money and Usury According to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350, Leiden, New York.
30.
LawnP.A. (2005). ‘An Assessment of the Valuation Methods Used to Calculate the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) and Sustainable Net Benefit Index (SNBI)’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(2), 185–208.
31.
LehtonenM. (2004). ‘The Environmental-Social Interface of Sustainable Development Capabilities, Social Capital, Institutions’, Ecological Economics, 49(2), 199–214.
32.
LiebermannY1979, ‘Elements in Talmudic Monetary Thought’, History of Political Economy, 11(2), 254–70.
33.
MagnussonL. (1994). Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language, Routledge, London.
34.
MamalakisM.J. (1996). ‘Misuse and Use of National Accounts as a Welfare Indicator-Selected Analytical and Measurement Issues’, Review of Income and Wealth, 42(3), 293–320.
35.
MarshallA. (1879). The Economics of Industry, 1994 edn, Thoemmes, Bristol.
36.
MarshallA. (1902). ‘Letter 713’, in WhitakerJK (ed.), 1996, The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist, 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 393.
37.
MarshallA. (1920). Principles of Economics, 8th edn, Macmillan, London.
38.
MarxK. (1863). Theories of Surplus 1–3, 1963 edn, ed. RyazanskayaSBurnsE, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow.
39.
MeekR.L. (1973). ‘Marginalism and Marxism ‘ in Collison-BlackRDCoatsAWGoodwinC (eds), The Marginal Revolution in Economics, Duke University Press, Durham, 233–245.
40.
MillJ.S. (1844). Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, 1968 edn, AM Kelley, New York.
41.
MillJ.S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy: With Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, 1973 edn, ed. AshleyW., A.M. Kelley, New York.
42.
MillerP. (1986). ‘Accounting for Progress: National Accounting and Planning in France: A Review Essay’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(1), 83–104.
43.
MoggeridgeD.E. (1995). Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography, Routledge, London.
44.
MorrisM.D. (1979). Measuring the Condition of the World’s Poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index, Pergamon Press, New York.
45.
MulbergJ. (1995). Social Limits to Economic Theory, Routledge, London.
46.
MulhallM.G. (1884). Dictionary of Statistics, London.
NaqviS.N.H. (1994). Islam, Economics and Society, Kegan Paul International, London.
49.
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) (1920). Income in the United States: Amount and Distribution 1909–1919, 1, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
50.
NelsonJ.A. (1993). ‘The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics’, in FerberM.A.NelsonJ.A. (eds), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 23–36.
51.
NiehansJ. (1993). ‘Revolution and Evolution in Economic Theory’, Australian Quarterly, 65(1), 498–515.
52.
O’ConnorJ. (1975). ‘Productive and Unproductive Labor’, Politics and Society, 5(3), 297–336.
53.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2007, ‘Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies’, Second OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, Istanbul, Turkey, 27–30June2007.
54.
PatinkinD. (1976). ‘Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction Between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period’, Econometrica, 44(6), 1091–1023.
55.
PesaranM.H.HarcourtG. (2000). ‘Life and Work of John Richard Nicholas Stone 1913–1991’, The Economic Journal, 110(461), F146–F165.
56.
PettySir William (1662). Treatise of Taxes and Contributions, 1899 edn, in HullCH (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
57.
PettySir William (1690). Political Arithmetik, 1899 edn, in HullCH (ed.), The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
ResnickS.WolffR. (2004). ‘Dialectics and Class in Marxian Economics: David Harvey and Beyond’, The New School of Economic Thought, 1(1), 91–114.
60.
RicardoD. (1817). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 1969 edn, Dent, London.
61.
RobbinsL. (1998). A History of Economic Thought, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
62.
RollE. (1992). A History of Economic Thought, Faber & Faber, London.
63.
SahlinsM.D. (1974). Stone Age Economics, Aldine–Atherton, Chicago.
64.
SamuelsonP. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
65.
SayJ.B. (1803). A Treatise on Political Economy: Or, The Production, Distribution and Consumption of Wealth, 1964 reprint, AM Kelley, New York.
66.
SchumacherE.F. (1974). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered, Abacus, London.
67.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis, Allen & Unwin, London.
68.
SchumpeterJ.A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th edn, Allen & Unwin, London.
69.
ShaikhA.M.TonakE.A. (1994). Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
70.
SkousenM. (2001). The Making of Modern Economics: The Lives and Ideas of the Great Thinkers, ME Sharpe, New York.
71.
SmithA. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and the Wealth of Nations, 1937 edn, ed. CannonE, The Modern Library, New York.
72.
SpiegelH.W. (1991). The Growth of Economic Thought, 3rd edn, Duke University Press, Durham.
73.
StaleyC.E. (1989). A History of Economic Thought: From Aristotle to Arrow, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.
74.
StockhammerE.HochreiterH.ObermayrB.SteinerK. (1997). ‘The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare as an Alternative to GDP in Measuring Economic Welfare: The Results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955–1992’, Ecological Economics, 21(1), 19–34.
75.
StoneR. (1947). ‘Definition and Measurement of National Income and Related Totals’, Appendix to Measurement of National Income and the Construction of Social Accounts, UN Publications, Geneva.
76.
StoneR. (1986). ‘Comments on the Overall Program’, Review of Income and Wealth, 32(2), 117–118.
77.
StudenskiP. (1958). The Income of Nations: Theory, Measurement and Analysis Past and Present, New York University Press, New York.
78.
TawneyR.H. (1938). Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
79.
ThomasAquinas (1274), Summa Theologica, rev. edn 1952 DJ Sullivan, trans. by fathers of the English Dominican Province, Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.
80.
TomlinsonJ. (1991). ‘Why Wasn’t There a ‘Keynesian Revolution’, in Economic Policy Everywhere?’, Economy and Society, 20(1), 103–119.
81.
WalrasL. (1874). Elements of Pure Economics: or, The Theory of Social Wealth, 1954 edn, trans. JaffeW., R.D. Irwin, Illinois.
82.
WaringM. (1988). Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women are Worth, Allen & Unwin, Wellington.
83.
WeberM. (1922). The Methodology of the Social Sciences, (1949 edition), eds & trans. ShilsEAFinchHA, The Free Press, New York.
84.
WheelerS.E. (1995). Wealth as Peril and Obligation, WB Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.
