Economic relations between the United States and Latin America remain strong and should continue to be vital for the coming decades. While both the US and Latin American countries are beginning to adjust to the rising economic power and evolving role of Asian nations in the global economy, the rumors of the demise of this long-standing partnership have been greatly exaggerated. This paper demonstrates the continuing importance of economic ties and discusses the reasons that both parties should focus on enhancing relationships now.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnsonCynthia J.GretzingerCarolyn M. (eds.) (2006). Latin America and the United States: The Future of the Relationship. Report from Forum with the same title at the Woodrow Wilson Institute for International Affairs on April 25.
2.
BaierScottBergstrandJeffreyVidalErika (2007). “Free Trade Agreements in the Americas: Are the Trade Effects Larger than Anticipated?”, The World Economy, 30(9), September, 1347–1377, 504–531.
3.
BenelliRobertoGangulySrideep (2007). Financial Linkages Between the United States and Latin America – Evidence from Daily Data. IMF work paper WP/07/262, November.
4.
CamposNauroKinoshitaYuko (2008). Foreign Direct Investment and Structural Reforms: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Latin America. IMF Working Paper 26, January.
5.
ClarkDon (2007). “Intraindustry Specialization ad the United States-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement”, The Developing Economies, XLV(4), December, 491–506.
6.
Council on Hemispheric Affairs (2008). Latin America and Europe: The Fugure of EUCAN Trade Negotiations. www.coha.org/2008/07/latin-america-and-europe-the-future-of-eu-acn-trade-negotiations/.
7.
European Commission (2007). Mercosur entry at http://ec.europa.eu/trade/issue/bilateral/regions/mercosur/index_en.htm.
8.
FeeneyRoberto (2008). “Development, Innovation and Natural Resources: The Latin-American Case”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 19(4).
9.
FeinbergRichard E. (2002). “Regionalism and Domestic Politics: US-Latin American Trade Policy in the Bush Era”, Latin American Politics and Society, 44(4), Winter, 127–151. www.jstor.org/stable/3176997.
10.
Free Trade Area of the Americas. www.ftaa-alca.org/alca_e.asp.
11.
FrechetteMyles (2006). “Rethinking Latin America: A New Approach in US Foreign Policy”, Harvard International Review, 28(2), Summer.
12.
GalloAndrés (2008). “Winds of Change in Latin America: Populism, Pro-Market Policies and the Challenges of Sustainable Economic Growth”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 19(4).
13.
HakimPeter (2006). “Is Washington Losing Latin America?”, Foreign Affairs, January/February.
14.
Hanson-KuhnKaren (2003). “FTAA Fails to Gain Support from Citizens and Governments Across the Region”, Foreign Policy in Focus Policy Brief, 8(3), November.
15.
HornbeckJ.F. (2007). US-Latin America Trade: Recent Trends. Congressional Research Service report #98–840. May.
16.
HufbauerGary C.SchottJeffreyKotschwarBarbara (1999). “US Interests in Free Trade in the Americas”, in The United States and the Americas: A Twenty-First Century View, FishlowAlbetJonesJames (eds). New York: W. W. Norton,.58–78. Government of the United States. www.export.gov/fta/
17.
International Trade Administration of United States (2007), NAFTA Analysis Report, October.
18.
JohnsonStephen (2005). “Balancing China’s Growing Influence in Latin America”, Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1888, October. www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/bg1888.cfm.
19.
KoseM.AyhanMeredithGuyM.ToweChristopher M. (2004). How Has NAFTA Affected the Mexican Economy?Review and Evidence. M. Ayhan Kose, IMF Working paper/04/59. April.
20.
KrauseMartin (2008). “The Quality of Latin American Institutions”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 19(4).
21.
LeonardThomas M. (2008). “United States-Latin American Relations: A Revisionist View”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics.
22.
Nowak-LehmannFelicitasHerzerDierkVollmerSebastian (2007). “The Free Trade Agreement Between Chile and the EU: Its Potential Impact on Chile’s Export Industry”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, 7(1), 99–120.
23.
Office of the United States Trade Representative (2007). www.ustr.gov. NAFTA Facts, NAFTA Benefits. NAFTA Policy Brief – October.
24.
OppenheimerAndrés (2007). Saving the Americas: The Dangerous Decline of Latin Americanand What the US Must Do. Random House Mondadori.
25.
PhilippidisG.SanjuanA. (2007). “An Analysis of Mercosur’s Regional Trading Arrangements”, The World Economy, 30(3), March.
26.
SchottJeffreyHufbauerGary C. (1999). “Whither the Free Trade Area of the Americas?”, World Economy, 22(6), August, 778–82.
27.
ShadlenKen (2008). “Globalisation, Power and Integration: The Political Economy of Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Americas”, Journal of Development Studies, 44(1), January, 1–20.
28.
SwistonAndrewBayoumiTamim (2008). Spillovers Across NAFTA, IMF Working Paper/08/3. January.
