This article analyzes the methodological foundations of Nobel Laureate A.K. Sen’s economic method as it pertains to his work on equality, poverty and economic development. The fundamental approach of “functionings” and “capabilities” that has been the hallmark of Professor Sen’s approach to problems of inequality and development are first presented and the common bases identified. The basic methods used are then analyzed from a logical and empirical perspective. Three levels of economic discourse in Professor Sen’s work are examined in detail and a fundamental critique is developed on logical grounds. The adequacy of this approach is then scrutinized by contrasting alternative approaches of end-state and process notions of equality. These two notions are compared on nine characteristics and the underlying differences and methodological problems with these two approaches are then identified. A comprehensive critique is developed and the major shortcomings of Professor Sen’s method are detailed. Professor Sen’s approach is found to be inadequate on logical and empirical grounds. Hence, it is suggested that this approach may be an inappropriate guide for economic policy to facilitate human development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrowK.J. (1950). ‘A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare’, Journal of Political Economy, 58.
2.
ArrowK.J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press.
3.
BergsonA. (1938). ‘A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52.
4.
BolandL.A. (1979). ‘A Critique of Friedman’s Critics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 17.
5.
BolandL.A. (1981). ‘On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis’, American Economic Review, 71.
6.
BolandL.A. (1982). The Foundations of Economic Method. George, Allen & Unwin.
7.
BolandL.A. (1989). The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology After Samuelson. Routledge.
8.
BuchananJ.D. (1978). Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s. New York University Press.
9.
DornJ.A. (ed.) (1998). China in the New Millennium: Market Reforms and Social Development. Cato Institute.
10.
DrezeJ.P.SenA.K. (1989). Hunger and Public Action. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
11.
DrezeJ.P.SenA.K. (1995/1998). India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford University Press.
12.
DrezeJ.P.SenA.K. (eds.) (1996/1998). Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
13.
DworkinR. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.
14.
DworkinR. (1981a). ‘What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare,’Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, reprinted in: DworkinR.. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Harvard University Press.
15.
DworkinR. (1981b). ‘What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,’Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, reprinted in: DworkinR.. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Harvard University Press.
16.
FrankfurtH. (1987). ‘Equality as a Moral Ideal’, Ethics, 98.
17.
FriedmanM. (1953). ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’. In FriedmanM.. Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press.
18.
GauthierD. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Clarendon Press.
19.
HareR.M. (1952). The Language of Morals. Clarendon Press.
20.
HareR.M. (1963). Freedom and Reason. Clarendon Press.
21.
HayekF.A. (1937). ‘Economics and Knowledge’, Economica, N.S.4.
22.
HayekF.A. (1945). ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35.
23.
HayekF.A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press.
24.
HayekF.A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
25.
HayekF.A. (ed.) (1975). Collectivist Economic Planning. August M. Kelly.
26.
HayekF.A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty – Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. University of Chicago Press.
27.
HayekF.A. (1978). New Studies in Philosophy, Economics and the History of Ideas. University of Chicago Press.
JamesW.E.NayaS.MeierG.M. (1989). Asian Development: Economic Success and Policy Lessons. University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
KamathS.J. (1992). The Political Economy of Suppressed Markets: Controls, Rent Seeking and Interest-Group Behavior in the Indian Sugar and Cement Industries. Oxford University Press.
31.
KamathS.J. (1994a). ‘Foreign Aid and India’s Leviathan State’. In BandowD.VasquezI.. (ed.) Perpetuating Poverty: The World Bank, the IMF and the Developing World. Corporate Press.
32.
KamathS.J. (1994b). ‘The Failure of Indian Development Planning’. In BoettkeP. J.. (ed.) The Collapse of Development Planning. New York University Press.
33.
KamathS.J. (1994c). ‘Privatisation – A Market Process Perspective’, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines), March.
34.
KamathS.J. (1999). ‘Indian Development and Poverty: Making Sense of Sen et al.’Critical Review, 13.
35.
KamathS.J.JensenK.C.BennettR.E. (1990). ‘The Empirical Appraisal of Economic Theories, Econometric Testing and the Logic of Refutation’, The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 12.
36.
LauL.J. (ed.) (1990). Models of Development: A Comparative Study of Economic Growth in South Korea and Taiwan. ICS Press.
37.
LetwinW. (ed.) (1983). Against Equality. Macmillan.
38.
NozickR. (1973). ‘Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Social Affairs, 5.
39.
NozickR. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
40.
MengerC. (1871/1976). Principles of Economics. New York University Press.
41.
MengerC. (1883/1963). Problems of Economics and Sociology, ed. SchneiderL.NockF.. University of Illinois Press.
42.
MisesL. von. (1949). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Yale University Press.
43.
MisesL. von. (1979). Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow. Regnery Gateway.
44.
NagelT. (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
NagelT. (1986). The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
46.
RabushkaA. (1987). The New China: Comparative Economic Development in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Westview Press.
47.
RawlsJ. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
48.
RileyJ.M. (1987). Liberal Utilitarianism. Cambridge University Press.
49.
RoyS. (1984). Pricing, Planning and Politics: A Study of Economic Distortions in India. Institute of Economic Affairs.
50.
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (1998). Press Release, Information Department, Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden, from website http://www.kva.se
51.
SamuelsonP.A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press.
52.
ScanlonT.M. (1982). ‘Contractualism and Utilitarianism’. In SenA. K.WilliamsB.. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.
53.
ScanlonT.M. (1988). ‘The Significance of Choice’. In Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 8University of Utah Press.
54.
SenA.K. (1970a). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day.
55.
SenA.K. (1970b). ‘The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal’. Journal of Political Economy, 72.
56.
SenA.K. (1973/1997). On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press.
57.
SenA.K. (1977). ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6.
58.
SenA.K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press.
59.
SenA.K. (1999). Development As Freedom. Alfred Knopf.
60.
ShenoyS. (1971). India: Progress or Poverty – A Review of the Outcome of Central Planning in India. Institute of Economic Affairs.
61.
SugdenR. (1993). ‘Welfare, Resources and Capabilities: A Review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31.
62.
SuzumuraK. (1983). Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare. Cambridge University Press.
63.
TemkinL. (1993). Inequality. Oxford University Press.
64.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
