“External” Corporate Governance: Argument about Hostile Takeover and the Poison Pill in Japan

Carney W.J. (1988). Controlling Management Opportunism in the Market for Corporate Control: An Agency Cost Model, Wisconsin Law Review, 1988, 385–433.

Danielson M.G. Karpoff J.M. (2002). Do Pills Poison Operating Performance?, Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection, available at http://papers.ssrn.comlabstract=304647 (visited Oct. 1, 2004).

Easterbrook F.H. Fischel D.R. (1991). The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Harvard University Press.

Gilson R.J. (2002). Lipton and Rowe’s Apologia for Delaware: A Short Reply, Delaware Journalof Corporate Law, 2002, 37–52

Gilson R.J. (2004). The Poison Pill in Japan: The Missing Infrastructure, Columbia Business Law Review, 2004, 21–44.

Jensen M.C. Warner J.B. (1988). The Distribution of Power Among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and the Directors, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 3–24.

Kanda H. (2004). Does Corporate Law Really Matter in Hostile Takeovers?: Commenting on Professor Gilson and Chancellor Chandler, Columbia Business Law Review, 2004, 67–76.

Kawai S. (2004). Poison Pill in Japan, Columbia Business Law Review, 2004, 11–20.

Lipton M. (2002). Pills, Polls, and Professors Redux, University of Chicago Law Review, 69, 1037–1065.

Manne H.G. (1965). Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110–120.

Matsui H. (2003). Tekitaiteki Kigyo Baishu ni taisuru Taikosaku no Kiso (Basis of Defensive Tactics against Hostile Takeovers), Rikkyo Hogaku (Rikkyo Law Review) 63, 101–128.

Milhaupt C.J. West M.D. (2003). Institutional Change and M&A in Japan: Diversity through Deals, in Global Markets, Domestic Institutions: Corporate Law and Governance ina New Era of Cross Border Deals, 295–338 ( Curtis J Milhaupt Ed. ): Columbia University Press.

Morita H. (2004). Kigyo Baishu Bouei Saku wo meguru Riron Jokyo (Theoretical Circumstance About Takeover Defense), in Kigyo Baishu Bouei Senryaku (Strategy for Takeover Defense), 209–232 ( Takei K. Ohta Y. Nakayama R. Ed): Shoji Homu (Commercial Legal Affairs).

Nakayama R. (2004). Nihongata Rights Plan (Poison Pill) Donyu ni kakaru Hoteki Kadai (Legal Issues for Introduction of Rights Plan (Poison Pill) into Japan), in Shojiho heno Teigen (The Proposals for Commercial Law), 403–437 ( Kozuka S. Takahasi M. Ed): Shoji Homu (Commercial Legal Affairs).

Stein J.C. (1988). Takeover threats and Managerial Myopia, Journal of Political Economy, 96(1), 61–80.

Suzuki K. (2004). Future Prospects of Takeovers in Japan Analyzed from the View of Share ownership Structures and Laws in Comparison with the United States and the European Union, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 777–824.

Takei K. (2004). Kigyo Baishu Bouei Senryaku no Hitsuyosei to Seitosei (Needs and Legitimacy of Takeover Defense), in Kigyo Baishu Bouei Senryaku (Strategy for Takeover Defense), 3–29 ( Takei K. Ohta Y Nakayama R. Ed): Shoji Homu (Commercial Legal Affairs).