AllenF.GaleD. (2000). Comparing Financial Systems, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2.
AllenF.SantomeroA. (2001). What do Financial Intermediaries Do?Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 271–94.
3.
AokiM. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4.
BebchukL.A.RoeM.J. (1999). A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Governance and Ownership, Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 127–170.
5.
BebchukL.A.RoeM.J. (2004). A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance, in GordonJ. N.RoeM. J., eds., Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 69–127.
6.
BerleA.MeansG. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Commerce Clearing House.
7.
BraendleU.C.NollJ. (2004). On the Convergence of National Corporate Governance Systems, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, this issue.
8.
HackethalA. (2000). Banken, Untemehmensfinanzierung und Finanzsystem, Frankfurt: Lang-Verlag.
9.
HackethalA.SchmidtR.H. (2000). Finanzsystem und Komplementarität, Kredit and Kapital, Supplement 15: Finanzm#aurkte im Umbruch, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 52–102.
10.
HackethalA.SchmidtR.H.TyrellM. (2003). German Corporate Governance – Transition to a Modern, Capital Market-Based System?Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 159, 664–674.
11.
HansmannH.B.KraakmanR.H. (2001/2004). The End of History for Corporate Law, Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 439–64, reprinted in GordonJ. N.RoeM. J., eds., Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 33–68.
12.
HirschmanA. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
13.
KrahnenJ.P.SchmidtR.H. (2004): Taking Stock and Looking Ahead – The German Financial System at the Crossroads, in: Krahnen/Schmidt, eds., The German Financial System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 485–515.
RieckersO.SpindlerG. (2004). Corporate Governance: Legal Aspects, in Krahmeu and Schmidt, eds., The German Financial System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 350–385.
16.
RoeM.J. (1994). Weak Owners, Strong Managers: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
SchmidtR.H. (1997): The Role of Other Constituencies, in PezardA.ThivaudJ.-M., eds., Corporate Governance: Les Perspectives Internationales, Paris: Montchrestien, 61–74.
18.
SchmidtR.H. (2004). Corporate Governance: An Economic Perspective, in Krahnen and Schmidt, eds., The German Financial System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 386–424.
19.
SchmidtR.H.SpindlerG. (2004). Path Dependence, Corporate Governance and Complementarity, International Finance, 5, 311–334.
20.
SchmidtR.H.SpindlerG. (2004). Path Dependence and Complementarity in Corporate Governance, in GordonJ. N.RoeM. J., eds., Convergence and Persistencein Corporate Governance, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 114–127.
21.
SchmidtR.H.TyrellM. (2004). What Constitutes a Financial System in General and the German Financial System in Particular? in: Krahnen/Schmidt, eds., The German Financial System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–67.
22.
SchmidtR.H.WeissM. (2003). Shareholder vs. Stakeholder: ökonomische Aspekte, in HommelhoffP.HoptK.von WerderAxel, eds., Handbuch Corporate Governance, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, 107–127.
23.
SoskicD.HallP. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
StreeckW. (2003). Taking Uncertainty Seriously: Complementarity as a Moving Target, in: The Transformation of the European Financial System. Where do we go? Where should wego?Proceedings of Oe NB Workshops No. 1, 2003, 101–115 (2004).