We analyse the implications of regulating market-based process attributes in an international trade context. We apply our work to agro-food products by providing anecdotal evidences. To guarantee fair trading in open market-based credence goods, we underline the importance of the defining stage prior to the stages of monitoring and signalling hidden credence properties. We briefly discuss some implications of marketing process attributes in the context of international trade, notably by stressing the need for international co-operation.
JEL Classification Numbers: D 82, F 13, Q 18, L 15
AndersenE.S.PhilipsenK. (1998). The Evolution of Credence Goods in Customer Markets: Exchanging “Pigs in Pokes”, Paper for the DRUID Winter Seminar, Middelfart, 8–10January.
2.
BagwellKyleRiordanMichael H. (1991). High and Declining Prices Signaling Product Quality, American Economic Review, 81, 224–239.
3.
CaswellJ.A.ModjuszkaE.M. (1996). Using Informational Labelling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 1248–1253.
4.
CaswellJ.A. (2000). Labeling Policy for GMOS: To Each his Own?, AgBioForum, 3(1), 305–309.
5.
DarbyM.R.KarniE. (1973). Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud, Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88.
6.
DelizaR.RosenthalA.HedderleyD.MacFieH.D.H.FrewerL.J. (1999). The Importance of Brand, Product Information and Manufacturing Process in the Development of Novel Environmentally Friendly Vegetable Oils, Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 10(3), 67–77.
7.
FischerR.SeratP. (2000). Standards and protection, Journal of International Economics, 52(2), 377–400.
8.
FordGary T.SmithDarlene B.SwasyJohn L. (1988). An Empirical Test of the Search, Experience and Credence Attributes Framework, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 239–248.
9.
GozlanE.MaretteS. (2000). Commerce International et Incertitude sur la Qualité des Biens Echangés, Economie Internationale, 81, 43–64.
10.
GrolleauG. (2000). L’Ecoproduit Agro-alimentaire: de la Compréhension des Concepts à la Complexité de la Réalité, Annales de l’Ecole des Mines, Responsabilité et Environnement, 18, 27–44.
11.
HookerN.H. (1999). Food Safety Regulation and Trade in Food Products, Food policy, 24, 653–668.
12.
JohanssonL.HaglundÅ.BerglundL.LeaP. (1999). Preference for Tomatoes, Affected by Sensory Attributes and Information About Growth Conditions, Food Quality and Preference, 10, 289–298.
13.
KirmaniAmnaRaoAkshay R. (2000). No Pain, no Gain: a Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality. Journal of Marketing, 64, 66–79.
14.
KrepsDavid M.WilsonRobert B. (1982). Reputation and Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 253–279.
15.
NelsonP. (1970). Information and Consumer Behaviour, Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.
16.
OCDE, (1998). Qualité et sécurité des produits alimentaires: considérations pour le commerce international.
17.
OtsukiT.WilsonJ.S.MirvatS. (2000). Saving two in a billion: A Case Study to Quantify the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports, World Bank Paper.
18.
ValceschiniE. (1999). Les Signaux de Qualité Crédibles sur les Marchés Agro-alimentaires: Certifications officielles et Marques, Actes du colloque SFERSignes officials de qualitlé et développement agricole, 147–166.
