The postal service is a neglected business in academic historiography. Today’s postal service confronts two challenges: information technology and deregulation. This study deals mostly with deregulatory issues in a historical perspective. Comparisons between different periods in Swedish postal history in regard to competition, cross-subsidisation and bases for a natural monopoly is presented, and also the long-term development of mail volume. It will be argued that there has been quite different attitudes towards competition; that different forms of cross-subsidisation has existed; that the postal service has been a natural monopoly, but for reasons related to change; that mail composition has been transformed from correspondence to mass mail; and that mail volume has increased despite the rise of new modes of communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alltid underveis. Postverkets historie gjennom 350 år(Always on the way. The history of the Post Office for 350 years). Oslo: Posten/Elanders, 1997 (in 2 volumes). Authors: Finn Erhard Johannessen, Lars Thue.
2.
AnderssonPeter: Deregulation and the Internet: new challenges to postal services in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation, Linköpings universitet, forthcoming 2001.
3.
BladhMats (1998). “Brevet som post” (“The letter as post”),i Kära brevvän. En bok om och med brev. Eva Dahlström (red) (Dear pen-friend. A book about and of letters). Stockholm: En bok för alla, 303–308.
4.
BladhMats (1998). “Om det systemiska i ‘infrasystem’ ” (About systemicy in infrasystems), in Polhem, 16(3–4), 206–218.
5.
BladhMats (1999). Posten, staten och informationssamhället, (The post, the state, and the information society). Stockholm: KFB.
6.
CoaseR.H. (1939). “Rowland Hill and the Penny Post”, in Economica, 423–435.
7.
CoaseR.H. (1961). “The British Post Office and the Messenger Companies”, in The Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 12–65.
8.
CrewMichael A.KleindorferPaul R. (1992). The economics of postal service. A research study supported by WIK, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer.
ForssellNils (1936). Svenska Postverkets historia I–II, (History of the Swedish Post Office, I–II). Stockholm: Generalpoststyrelsen.
11.
HelgessonClaes-Fredrik (1999). Making a Natural Monopoly. The Configuration of a Techno-Economic Order in Swedish Telecommunications. Stockholm School of Economics.
12.
IvarssonMichaelMathsonPeter (1994). De fyra stegen. En bok om Postens förändring, (The four steps. A book about the transformation of the Post). Stockholm: Posten AB.
13.
JanssonSörenLindqvistLotte (1996). Järnvägsposten. En kamp mot tiden, (Railmail. A struggle against time). Meddelanden från Postmuseum 39. Stockholm: Postmuseum.
14.
KvarnströmLars (1998). Män i staten. Stationskarlar och brevbärare i statens tjänst 1897–1937, (Men in the state. Station-men and letter-carriers in the service of the state). Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm Studies in History 55. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
15.
LundgrenBritta (1990). Allmänhetens tjänare. Kvinnlighet och yrkeskultur i det svenska postverket, (Public servants. Womanhood and professional culture within the Swedish Post Office). Stockholm: Carlssons.
16.
P & Ts historie (The history of the P&T)København: Generaldirektoratet for Post- og Telegrafvæsenet, 1991–1993 (in 5 volumes). Authors: Otto Madsen; Anders Monrad Møller, Poul Thestrup, Bent Blüdnikow, Hans Chr. Johansen.
17.
PanzarJohn C. (1991). “Is postal service a natural monopoly?”, in Competition and innovation in postal services. Edited by CrewMichael A.KleindorferPaul R., Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer, 219–228.
18.
PanzarJohn C. (1993). “Competition, efficiency and the vertical structure of postal services”, in Regulation and the nature of postal and delivery services. Edited by CrewMichael A.KleindorferPaul R., Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer, 91–105.
19.
PietiäinenJukka-Pekka (1988). Den finska postens historia, (History of the Finnish post). Helsingfors: Post- & Televerket.
RainerOve (1982). “Declining importance of the postal monopoly ‘in Sweden”, i Union Postale, 3.
22.
RogersonCathy M.TakisWilliam M.“Economies of scale and scope and competition in postal services”, in Regulation and the nature of postal and delivery services, 109–127.
23.
SamuelssonKurt (1978). Postbanken—postsparbank och postgiro—1884–1925–1974, (The postal bank—post-office savings bank and postal giro—1884–1925–1974). Stockholm: Postverket.
