People tend to believe that more information will improve the accuracy of predicting outcomes in highly uncertain situations. This behaviour, known as ‘illusion of knowledge,’ is related to overconfidence in multiple areas of study, and attracts scientific attention. The aim of this research is to determine the academic evolution of the illusion of knowledge within the financial field. For this purpose, two different methodologies have been used to generate a more solid contribution. The first part is based on the ReSiste-CSH bibliographic framework raised for the study of social sciences, and the second part uses the Bibliometrix software to measure the performance of the subject over time. The Web of Science academic database was used as a reference source for the period 1987–2021, resulting in a sample of 1,202 papers in highly impactful academic journals. The results show a positive evolution over time in the number of publications, as well as a geographical concentration in journals of the Q1 category from the United States and the United Kingdom, together with a close relationship with areas of study such as psychology, business and economics, among others.
AriaM., & CuccurulloC. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2.
BakerH. K., FilbeckG., & RicciardiV. (2017). Financial behavior (Vol. 4). Oxford University Press.
3.
BarberB. M., & OdeanT. (2001a). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. 10.1162/003355301556400
4.
BarberB. M., & OdeanT. (2001b). The internet and the investor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 41–54. 10.1257/jep.15.1.41
5.
BarberB. M., & OdeanT. (2002). Online investors: Do the slow die first ?The Review of Financial Studies Special, 15(2), 455–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.455
6.
BiaisB., HiltonD., MazurierK., & PougetS. (2005). Judgemental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market. Review of Economic Studies, 72(2), 287–312. 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00333.x
7.
BoothA., PapaioannouD., & SuttonA. (2014). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 34(1). 10.5596/c13-009
8.
CallonM., CourtialJ. P., & LavilleF. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. 10.1007/BF02019280
9.
CodinaL. (2018). Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: Procedimientos generales y Framework para Ciencias Humanas y Sociales [Systematized literature reviews: General procedures and framework for human and social sciences] (Master’s degree in Social Communication, pp. 1–87). Máster Universitario En Comunicación Social. Departamento de Comunicación. https://repositori.upf.edu/
10.
FisherM., GodduM. K., & KeilF. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 674–687. 10.1037/xge0000070
11.
FisherM., & KeilF. C. (2015). The curse of expertise: When more knowledge leads to miscalibrated explanatory insight. Cognitive Science, 40(5), 1251–1269. 10.1111/cogs.12280
12.
Frid-NielsenS. S., & JensenM. D. (2021). Maps of behavioural economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 33(2) 226–250. 10.1177/0260107920925675
13.
GarcíaM. J. R. (2013). Financial education and behavioral finance: New insights into the role of information in financial decisions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(2), 297–315. 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00705.x
14.
GolmanR., HagmannD., & LoewensteinG. (2017). Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 96–135. 10.1257/jel.20151245
15.
GrantM. J., & BoothA. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
16.
HallC. C., ArissL., & TodorovA. (2007). The illusion of knowledge: When more information reduces accuracy and increases confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 277–290. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.003
17.
HirshleiferD. (2001). Investor psychology and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533–1597. 10.1111/0022-1082.00379
18.
KellerK. L., & StaellnR. (1987). Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(September), 200–213. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489411?origin=JSTOR-pdf
19.
KumarS., & GoyalN. (2016). Evidence on rationality and behavioural biases in investment decision making. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 8(4). 10.1108/QRFM-05-2016-0016
20.
LeonhardL., KarnowskiV., & KümpelA. S. (2020). Online and (the feeling of being) informed: Online news usage patterns and their relation to subjective and objective political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 103(August2018), 181–189. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.008
21.
MartelliD. (2017). The psychology of traders. In BakerH. K., FilbeckG. and RicciardiV. (Eds.), Financial behavior, player, services, products and markets (pp. 192–208). Oxford University Press.
22.
MarusichL. R., BakdashJ. Z., OnalE., YuM. S., SchafferJ., O’DonovanJ., HöllererT., BuchlerN., & GonzalezC. (2016). Effects of information availability on command-and-control decision making: Performance, trust and situation awareness. Human Factors, 58(2), 301–321. 10.1177/0018720815619515
23.
MerkleC. (2017). Financial overconfidence over time: Foresight, hindsight, and insight of investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 84. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.07.009
24.
MontierJ. (2007). Behavioural investing: A practitioner’s guide to applying behavioural finance (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118673430.ch2
25.
MüllerP., SchneidersP., & SchäferS. (2016). Appetizer or main dish? Explaining the use of Facebook news posts as a substitute for other news sources. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 431–441. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.003
26.
NofsingerJ. R. (2017). The psychology of investing. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315506579
27.
O’ConnorL. G., & DillinghamL. L. (2014). Personal experience as social capital in online investor forums. Library and Information Science Research, 36(1), 27–35. 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.001
28.
OliverB. R., & MeftehS. (2010). Capital structure choice: The influence of sentiment in France. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 1(4), 294. 10.1504/ijbaf.2010.032844
29.
OskampS. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(3), 261–265. 10.1037/h0022125
30.
ParkJ. H., GuB., LeungA. C. M., & KonanaP. (2014). An investigation of information sharing and seeking behaviors in online investment communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 1–12. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.002
31.
ParkJ. H., KonanaP., GuB., KumarA., & RaghunathanR. (2013). Information valuation and confirmation bias in virtual communities: Evidence from stock message boards. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 1050–1067. 10.1287/isre.2013.0492
32.
PetersonD. K., & PitzG. F. (1988). Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 14(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.85
33.
RappD. N., HinzeS. R., KohlheppK., & RyskinR. A. (2014). Reducing reliance on inaccurate information. Memory and Cognition, 42(1), 11–26. 10.3758/s13421-013-0339-0
34.
Rey-MartíA., Ribeiro-SorianoD., & Palacios-MarquésD. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651–1655. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
35.
SchäferS. (2020). Illusion of knowledge through Facebook news? Effects of snack news in a news feed on perceived knowledge, attitude strength, and willingness for discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 103(August2019), 1–12. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.031
36.
SmithS. D. (2010). Confidence and trading aggressiveness of naïve investors: Effects of information quantity and consistency. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(2), 295–316. 10.1007/s11142-009-9106-7
37.
SonL. K., & KornellN. (2010). The virtues of ignorance. Behavioural Processes, 83(2), 207–212. 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.005
38.
TsaiC. I., KlaymanJ., & HastieR. (2008). Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 97–105. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.005
39.
TverskyA., & KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 6(4), 1124–1131. 10.1016/0022-1031(70)90052-1
40.
UAMU. A. de Ma. (2021). Tutorial del JCR (Journal Citation Reports). Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
41.
WangY. (2014). Does online trading affect investors’ trading intention?The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 8(5), 71–79.
42.
WilliamsonC. K. (2008). Where information is paramount: A mixed methods, multi-disciplinary investigation of Australian online investors. Information Research. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/where-information-is-paramount-a-mixed-methods-multi-disciplinary
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
