In this paper, we investigate the macroeconomic response to exogenous shocks, namely the COVID-19. We conjecture that the sensitivity of an economic system to an exogenous shock is endogenous on its characteristics and ability to counter a shock. We use the COVID-19 crisis as an exogenous shock, and we argue that a higher income inequality is likely to lead to a greater negative impact of an exogenous shock on economic growth. We validate our expectations using different inequality indexes. In further robustness tests, we confirm our conclusions using different proxies for economic conditions.
AcemogluD. (2002). Technical change, inequality and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 1, 7–72.
2.
AcemogluD., & JohnsonS. (2012). Who captured the ded? (p. 29). New York Times.
3.
AghionP., CaroliE., & Garcia-PenalosaC. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 4, 1615–1660.
4.
AlesinaA., & PerottiR. (1996). Income distribution, political instability and investment. European Economic Review, 40, 1203–1228.
5.
AlesinaA., & RodrikD. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 465–490.
6.
BanerjeeA. V., & DufloE. (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say?Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 267–299.
7.
BenabouR. (1996). Inequality and growth. NBER Working Paper no. 5658.
8.
BennettD. L., & NikolaevB. (2017). On the ambiguous economic freedom–inequality relationship. Empirical Economics, 53, 717–754.
9.
BensonC., & ClayE. (2004). Understanding the economic and financial impact of natural disasters. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
10.
BoundJ., & JohnsonG. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980s: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review, 83, 371–392.
11.
BrunoM. (1993). Crisis, stabilization, and economic reform: Therapy by consensus. Clarendon Press.
12.
ChiarellaC., FlaschelP., & FrankeR. (2005). Foundations for a disequilibrium theory of the business cycle. Cambridge University Press.
13.
De DominicisL., FloraxR. J. G. M., & de GrootH. L. F. (2008). A meta-analysis on the relationship between income inequality and economic growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 55(5), 654–682.
14.
FeenstraR. C., & HansonG. H. (1999). The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the U.S., 1979–1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 907–940.
15.
ForbesK. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90, 869–887.
16.
FrischR. (1933). Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics. Economic Essay in honor of Gustav Cassel. George Allen and Unwin.
17.
FurceriD., & LounganiP. (2018). The distributional effects of capital account liberalization. Journal of Development Economics, 130, 127–144.
18.
FurmanJ., & StiglitzJ. E. (1998). Economic consequences of rising income inequality. Income inequality: Issues and policy options. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas, MO, 221–63.
19.
GalloC. (2002). Economic growth and income inequality: Theoretical background and empirical evidence. Working Paper N. 119, Development Planning Unit, University College London.
20.
GalorO., & ZeiraJ. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 35–52.
21.
GoodwinR. (1967). A growth cycle. In FeinsteinC. (Ed.), Socialism, capitalism and economic growth. Cambridge University Press.
22.
GunerN., Lopez-DaneriM., & VenturaG. (2016). Heterogeneity and government revenues: Higher taxes at the top?Journal of Monetary Economics, 80, 69–85.
23.
HahnF., & SolowR. (1995). A critical essay on modern macroeconomic theory. The MIT Press.
24.
HallegatteS., & GhilM. (2007). Endogenous business cycles and the economic response to exogenous shocks, Nota di Lavoro, No. 20.2007, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano.
25.
HarrodR. (1939). An essay on dynamic economic theory. Economic Journal, 49, 14–33.
JuglarC. (1862). Des Crises commerciales et leur retour périodique en France, en Angleterre, et aux Etats-Unis, Strasbourg, Imprimerie de Veuve.
28.
KaldorN. (1957). Alternative theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 83–100.
29.
KarahanF., & OzkanS. (2013). On the persistence of income shocks over the life cycle: Evidence, theory, and implications. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16(3), 452–476.
30.
KuznetsS. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
31.
KydlandF. E., & PrescottE. C. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 50, 1345–1370.
32.
LiH., & ZouH. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2, 318–334.
33.
LoeuilleN., & GhilM. (2004). Intrinsic and climatic factors in North-American animal population dynamics. BMC Ecology, 4, 6. 10.1186/1472-6785-4-6.
34.
PasinettiL. (1962). Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 267–279.
35.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press.
36.
PorterM., SternS., & Artavia LoriaR. (2013). Social progress index 2013. http://www.competitividad.org.do/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SocialProgressIndex2013.pdf
37.
PriesterM., & MendelsonA. (2015). Income inequality. http://inequality.org/income-inequality/
38.
RanisG. (2004). Human development and economic growth. Center Discussion Paper No. 887, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
39.
RicardoD. (1810). The high price of bullion, a proof of the depreciation of bank notes. John Murray.
40.
RodrikD. (1998). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 6350.
41.
SamuelsonP. (1939). A synthesis of the principle of acceleration and the multiplier. Journal of Political Economy, 47, 786–797.
42.
ScheuermeyerP., & GrundlerK. (2015). Income inequality, economic growth and the effect of redistribution. Würzburg Economic Papers, No. 95, University of Würzburg.
43.
SenA. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
44.
ShariffZ. (1996). Inequality and government. InInequality, Edited by DuggerW. M, Greenwood Publishing Group.
45.
SlutskyE. (1927). The summation of random causes as a source of cyclic processes, III(1), Conjuncture Institute, Moscow, Reprinted inEconometrica, 5, 105–146.
46.
SmithA. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. (Reprinted London: Methuen, 5th ed., Ed., E. Cannan, 1904).
47.
StiglitzJ. E. (2015). The origins of inequality, and policies to contain it. National Tax Journal, 68(2), 425–448.
48.
StreetenP. P. (1979). Basic needs: Premises and promises. Journal of Policy Modelling, World Bank Reprint Series: Number Sixty-two.
49.
SullivanA., & SheffrinS. M. (2006). Economics: Principles in action. Pearson Prentice Hall.
50.
TabassumA., & MajeedM. (2008). Economic growth and income inequality relationship: Role of credit market imperfection. The Pakistan Development Review, 47(4), 727–743. https://www.researchgate.netpublication/46532500_Economic_Growth_and_Income_Inequality_Relationship_Role_of_Credit_Market_Imperfection.
51.
United Nations. (2013). Inequality matters. [online]. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/reports/InequalityMatters.pdf
52.
World Bank. (1999). Turkey: Marmara earthquake assessment. World Bank Working Paper.
