F. Hayek is known as an economist and a political philosopher who provided a specific social theory based on the idea of spontaneous order. This order state comes from a process that Hayek called ‘catallaxy’ and that results from a particular phenomenon of emergence. In this context, social systems such as money, market or language are presented as spontaneous orders, resulting from a particular evolutionary process of society. Although Hayek is well known to be an opponent of importation of physical concepts into economics, this article proposes a parallel between the Hayekian theory and a new field called ‘econophysics’. More precisely, I will show how the way of characterizing the phenomenon of emergence by econophysicists might, to some extent, be an analytical characterization of the Hayekian emergence. This claim will be explained and illustrated with the presentation of econophysical works describing money and language as a spontaneous order taking the form of a power law. The last section will discuss the debates about the methodological relevance to associate Hayek’s theory with an area of knowledge coming from physics and the potential\economic implications of such a rapprochement.
AdamicA., & HubermanB. (2000). Power law distribution of the World Wide Web. Science, 287(1), 2115–2216.
2.
AielloetW., ChungF., & LuL. (2000). A random graph model for massive graphs. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, New York, 171–180.
3.
AimarT. (2002). Commentaire sur economie et connaissance de F. Hayek. Cahiers d’Economie Politique, 2(43), 105–118.
4.
AmaralL., BuldyrevS.V., HavlinS., LeschhornH., MaassP., SalingerM. A., … StanleyM.H.R. (1997). Scaling behavior in economics: I. Empirical results for company growth. Journal de Physique I, 7(2), 621–633.
5.
ArtemiC. (2009). From econophysics to politics (Working Paper). Scientific High School. Universita’ Per La Terza Eta, Orvieto, Italy.
6.
AusloosM. (2014). Toward fits to scaling-like data, but with inflection points & generalized Lavalette function. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 9(2), 1.
AxtellR., & FloridaR. (2006). Emergent cities: Microfoundations of Zipf’s law (Working paper). Center of Social and Economic Dynamics, Washington, USA.
9.
BakP. (1994). Introduction to self-criticality. In CowanG., PinesD. and MeltzerD. (Eds), Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality (476–482). Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute.
10.
BakP., PaczuskiM., & ShubikM. (1997). Price variations in a stock market with many agents. Physica A, 246(1), 430–453.
11.
BakP., TangC., & WiesenfeldK. (1987). Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters, 59 (4), 381–384.
12.
BalcanD., ColizzaV., Gonc¸alvesB., HuH., RamascoJ. J., & VespignaniA. (2009). Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 21484–21489.
13.
BallT. (2003). The Cambridge history of twentieth-century political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BaronchelliA. (2006). Statistical mechanics approach to language games (Ph.D Dissertation). Retrieved from Sapienza University of Rome.
15.
BattermanR. (2002). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction and emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
BouchaudJ-P. (2002). An introduction to statistical finance. Physica A, 313(3), 238–251.
17.
BouchaudJ-P., & PottersM. (2003). Theory of Financial Risk and Derivate Pricing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
ButosW. (2003). Knowledge questions: Hayek, Keynes and beyond. The Review of Austrian Economics, 16, (4), 291–307.
19.
CaldwellB. (2004). Hayek’s scientific subjectivism. In WoodC. & WoodD. (Eds), Friedrich A. Hayek: Critical assessments of leading economists (2nd series, vol. 1–4). London: Routledge.
ChomskyN. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22.
ChomskyN.. (1972). Language and mind. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
23.
ClaesA., FrenkenK., & HellervikA. (2006). A complex network approach to urban growth. Environment and Planning A, 38(10), 1941–1964.
24.
ColanderD., FollmerH., HaasA., GodberM, JuseliusK., KirmanA., … SlotB. (2008). The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic finance. 98th Dahlem Workshop on Modeling of Financial Markets, Dahlem, Germany.
25.
CraverC. (2006). When models explain. Synthese, 153(2), 355–376.
26.
De Solla PriceD.J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
27.
DempsterG. (1999). Austrians and post keynesians: The questions of ignorance and uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4), 73–81.
28.
DonangeloR., & SneppenK. (2000). Self-organization of value and demand. Physica A, 276(1), 572–580.
29.
DostalerG. (2001). La liberalisme d’Hayek. Paris: La Découverte.
30.
EeckhoutJan. (2004). Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. American Economic Review, 94(1), 1429–1451.
31.
FarmerJ.D. (1999). Physicists attempt to scale the ivory towers of finance. Computer Science & Engineering (IEEE), 1(6), 26–39.
32.
FarmerD., ShubikM., & SmithE. (2005, September). Is economics the next physical science?Physics Today, p. 37–42.
33.
GabaixX. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 739–767.
34.
GabaixX. (2009). Power laws in economics and finance. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 255–294.
35.
GabaixX., GopikrisnanP., PlerouV., & EugeneS.H. (2003). A theory of power law distributions in financial market fluctuations. Nature, 423(1), 267–270.
36.
GallegatiM., KeenS., LuxT., & OrmerodP. (2006). Worrying trends in econophysics. Physica A, 370(1), 1–6.
37.
GausG.F. (2006). Hayek on the evolution of society and mind. In FeserE. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hayek (pp. 232–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
GongT., MinettJ., & WangW. (2006). Language origin and the effect of individuals’ popularity. Proceedings of IEEE conference on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, Canada.
GingrasY., & SchinckusC. (2012). The institutionalization of econophysics in the shadow of physics. Journal of the History of Economics Thought, 34(2), 109–130.
41.
GrayJ. (1982). Hayek and classical liberalism: A bibliographical essay. Literature of Liberty, 5(4), 19–101.
42.
HackettJ. (1967). 70 years of best sellers, 1895–1965. New York, NY: Bowker Company.
43.
HayekF. ([1948] 1980). The Use of Knowledge in Society. In Individualism and Economics Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
HayekF.A. (1929). Monetary theory and the trade cycle. London: Jonathan Cape.
45.
HayekF.A. (1931). Prices and production. London: Routledge & Sons.
46.
HayekF.A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4(1), 33–54.
47.
HayekF.A. (1939). Profits, interest and investment. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
48.
HayekF.A. (1942). Scientism and the study of society. Economica, 9(1), 267–291.
49.
HayekF.A. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.
50.
HayekF.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
51.
HayekF.A. (1952). The sensory order: Inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
52.
HayekF.A. (1964). The theory of complex phenomena. In BungeM. (Ed.), The critical approach to science and philosophy (pp. 332–349). London: MacMillan.
53.
HayekF.A. (1967). The constitution of a liberal state. Il Politico, 32(1), 455–461.
54.
HayekF.A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, Volume1: Rules and order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
HayekF.A. (1974). The pretence of knowledge. American Economic Review, 79(1), 3–4.
56.
HempelC. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanations. In HempelC., Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 331–489). New York, NY: Free Press.
57.
HollandJ. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. New York, NY: Helix Books.
58.
IngraoB., & IsraelG. (1990). The invisible hand: Economic equilibrium in the history of science. London: MIT Press.
59.
JimenezE. (2004). Econophysics: From game theory and information theory to quantum mechanics. Physica A, 348(3), 505–543.
60.
JovanovicF., & SchinckusC. (2013). The history of econophysics as a new approach in modern financial theory. History of Political Economy, 45(3), 443–474.
61.
JovanovicF., & SchinckusC. (2017). Econophysics and financial economics: An emerging dialogue. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
KimJ. (2006). Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese, 151(2), 547–559.
63.
KirmanA. (1992). Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?Journal of Economic Perspectives6(2), 117–136.
64.
KopplR. (2000). Policy implications of complexity: An Austrian perspective. In ColanderD. (Ed.), The complexity vision and the teaching of economics (pp. 97–117). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
65.
KutnerR., & GrechD. (2008). Report on foundation and organization of econophysics graduate courses at faculty of physics of University Of Warsaw and department of physics and astronomy of the Wrocław University. Acta Physica Polonica A, 114(3), 637–647.
66.
LavoieD. (1989). Economic chaos or spontaneous order: Implications for political economy of the new view of science. Cato Journal, 8(3), 613–635.
67.
LégéP. (2007). Hayek: Penseur génial ou incohérent?L’Economie Politique, 4(36), 46–59.
68.
LerouxA., & NadeauR. (2002). Ordre spontané et ordre organise chez Hayek. Cahiers d’Economie Politique, 2(43), 31–32.
69.
LevyM.H., HaimL., & SorinS. (1995). Microscopic simulation of the stock market: The effect of microscopic diversity. Journal de Physique I, 5(8), 1087–1107.
70.
LevyM.H., HaimL., & SorinS. (2000). Microscopic simulation of financial markets: From investor behaviour to market phenomena. San Diego: Academic Press.
71.
LoretoV., & SteelsL. (2007). Emergence of language. Nature, 3(2), 758–760.
72.
LuttmerE. (2007). Selection, growth, and the size distribution of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1103–1144.
73.
LuxTh. (2009). Applications of Statistical Physics to Finance and Economics. In RosserBarkley (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Complexity (pp. 213–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
74.
MaasHarro. (2005). William Stanley Jevons and the making of modern economics. New York, NY and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
MajoranaE. (1942). Il valore delle leggi statistiche nella physica e nelle scienze sociali [The value of Statistical Laws in Physics and in Social Sciences]. Scientia, 36(1), 55–66.
76.
MandelbrotB. (1963). The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices. Journal of Business, 36(4), 394–419.
77.
MandelbrotB. (1966). Forecasts of Future Prices, Unbiased Markets, and “Martingale” Models. Journal of Business, 39(1, Part 2), 242–255.
78.
MandelbrotB. (1997). Fractals and scaling laws in finance. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
79.
MantegnaR. (1991). Levy walks and enhanced diffusion in Milan stock exchange. Physica A, 179(1), 232–242.
80.
MantegnaR.N., & StanleyH. (1994). Stochastic process with ultraslow convergence to a Gaussian: The truncated lévy flight. Physical Review Letters, 73(1), 2946−2949.
81.
MantegnaR.N., & StanleyH. (1999). An introduction to econophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
McCauleyJ. (2004). Dynamics of markets: Econophysics and finance. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
83.
McCauleyJ. (2006). Response to ‘worrying trends in econophysics. Physica A, 371(1), 601–609.
84.
MeloniS., ArenasA., & MorenoY. (2009). Traffic-driven epidemic spreading in finite-size scale-free networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 106, 16897–16902.
85.
MénardClaude (1981). La machine et le coeur. Essai sur les analogies dans le raisonnement économique. In LichnerowiczA., PerrouxF. & GadoffreG. (Eds), Analogie et connaissance. Paris: Éditions Maloine.
86.
MirowskiP. (1989). More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
MorganC. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.
88.
MorrisonM. (2015). Reconstructing reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89.
NeukumG., & IvanovA. (1994). Crater size distributions and impact probabilities on Earth from lunar terrestial-planet, and asteroid cratering data. In GehrelsT. (Ed.), Hazards due to comets and asteroids (pp. 359–416). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
90.
NewmanM.E. (2004). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351.
91.
ParetoV. (1897). Cours d’Économie Politique Professé a l’Université de Lausanne (Vol. I, Vol. II).
92.
RednerS. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Journal of Physics B, 4(3), 131–134.
93.
RicklesD. (2008). Econophysics and the complexity of the financial markets. In CollierJ. & HookerC. (Eds), Handbook of the philosophy of science, Volume 10: Philosophy and complex systems. New York, NY: North Holland Elsevier Editions.
94.
RosserB.Jr. (1999). On the complexities of complex economic dynamics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 169–192.
95.
RosserB.Jr. (2003). Complexity in economics. New York, NY: Edward Elgar.
96.
RosserB. (2006). The nature and future of econophysics. In ChatterjeeArnab and ChakrabartiBikas K. (Eds), Econophysics of Stock and other Markets (pp. 225–234). Milan: Springer.
97.
SalmonW. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
98.
SawyerR. (2005). Social emergence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99.
SchabasM. (1990). A world ruled by number: William Stanley Jevons and the rise of mathematical economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100.
SchinckusC. (2009). Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A, 388(20), 4414–4423.
101.
SchinckusC. (2010). Econophysics and economics: Sister disciplines?American Journal of Physics, 78(4), 325–327.
102.
SchinckusC. (2013a), How do econophysicists make stable levy processes physically plausible. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 43(4), 281–293.
103.
SchinckusC. (2013b). Between complexity of modelling and modelling of complexity: An essay on econophysics. Physica A, 392(1), 3654–3665.
104.
SchinckusC. (2013c). Econophysics, a new step in the evolution of physical sciences. Contemporary Physics, 54(1), 17–32.
105.
SchinckusC. (2017). Econophysics and Complexity Studies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universiy of Cambridge.
106.
ShinoharaS., & GunjiY. (2001). Emergence and collapse of money through reciprocity. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 117(1), 131–150.
107.
SoaresM., CorsoG., & Luneca. (2005). The network of syllables in Portuguese. Physica A, 335(3), 678–684.
108.
SongC., QuZ., BlummN., & BarabasiL. (2010). Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science, 327(2), 1018–1021.
109.
StanleyH. E., AfanasyevV., NunesAmaral. L., BuldyrevS., GoldbergerA., HavlinS., LeschhornH., MassP., MantegnaR., PengC-K., PrinceP., SalingerA., & ViswanathanK. (1996). Anomalous fluctuations in the dynamics of complex systems: From DNA and physiology to econophysics. Physica A, 224(1), 302–321.
110.
StanleyH., GabaixX., GopikrishnanP., & PlerouV. (2007). Economic fluctuations and statistical physics: Quantifying extremely rare and less rare events in finance. Physica A, 382(1), 286–301.
111.
TuerckD. (1995). Economics as mechanism: The mind as machine in Hayek’s sensory order. Constitutional Political Economy, 6(3), 281–292.
112.
VriendN. J. (2002). Was Hayek an ace?. Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), 811–840.
113.
WichmannS. (2005). On the power-law distribution of language family. Journal of Linguistics, 41(2), 117–131.
114.
YamamotoK., & MiyazimaS. (2004). Power-law behaviour in social and economical phenomena. Physica A, 344(1), 757–763.
115.
YasutomiA. (1995). The emergence and collapse of money. Physica D, 82(1), 180–194.
