Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between right and wrong. Rather, the decision may represent a trade-off between competing moral concerns (for example, being fair and impartial to all versus loyal to one’s own group). Taking the tension between fairness and loyalty as a case study, we demonstrate that the way people make trade-offs between competing moral norms predicts morally relevant behaviour, such as decisions to blow the whistle on unethical acts. We then suggest that this tension reflects a deeper distinction within our moral psychology, namely, a distinction between group-based norms (for example, loyalty) and norms that apply universally, independent of group membership (for example, fairness). Finally, we discuss what factors may influence the adoption of group-based versus group-independent norms and therefore, how these factors might deter or promote corruption.
JEL: M14 Corporate Culture, Diversity, Social Responsibility
AndréJ.B.BaumardN. (2011). The evolution of fairness in a biological market. Evolution, 65(5), 1447–1456.
2.
AnikL.AkninL. B.NortonM. I.DunnE. W.QuoidbachJ. (2013). Prosocial bonuses increase employee satisfaction and team performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 13–095.
3.
AquinoK.Reed IIA. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.
4.
ArielyD. (2013). The honest truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone—Especially ourselves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
5.
AschS. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity, I: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.
6.
AshforthB. E.AnandV. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.
7.
BanajiM. R.BazermanM. H.ChughD. (2003). How (un)ethical are you?Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 56–64.
8.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.
9.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.
10.
BanduraA.CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.PastorelliC.RegaliaC. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125–135.
11.
BarclayP.WillerR. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 749–753.
12.
BarnettT.VaicysC. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.
13.
BarryB.OliverR. (1996). Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 127–143.
14.
BatsonC. D. (2011). What’s wrong with morality?Emotion Review, 3(3), 230–236.
15.
BatsonC. D.KobrynowiczD.DinnersteinJ. L.KampfH. C.WilsonA. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335–1348.
16.
BatsonC. D.ThompsonE. R.SeuferlingG.WhitneyH.StrongmanJ. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.
17.
BaumardN.AndréJ.B.SperberD. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–122.
18.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
19.
BensonM. L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23(4), 583–607.
20.
BhattacharjeeA.BermanJ. Z.ReedA. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1184.
21.
BishopJ. W.ScottK. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439–450.
22.
BloomP. (2011). Family, community, trolley problems, and the crisis in moral psychology. The Yale Review, 99(2), 26–43.
23.
BrosigJ. (2002). Identifying cooperative behavior: Some experimental results in a prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 47(3), 275–290.
24.
BrosnanS. F.SchiffH. C.de WaalF. B. M. (2005). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 272, 253–258.
25.
CacioppoJ. T.PatrickW. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
26.
CappellettiD.GothW.PlonerM. (2011). Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 940–950.
27.
ChiaburuD.HarrisonD. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103.
28.
ChiangY. (2010). Self-interested partner selection can lead to the emergence of fairness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(4), 265–270.
29.
CikaraM.BruneauE. G.SaxeR. R. (2011). Us and them intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149–153.
30.
CikaraM.FiskeS. T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 63–71.
31.
CohenS. G.BaileyD. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
32.
CohenT. R.MontoyaR. M.InskoC. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1559–1572.
33.
CohenT. R.PanterA. T.TuranN. (2012). Guilt proneness and moral character. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 355–359.
34.
CornelissenG.DewitteS.WarlopL. (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1080–1090.
35.
CushmanF. A. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353–380.
36.
DahlingJ. J.WhitakerB. G.LevyP. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35, 219–257.
37.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.GailliotM. T.ManerJ. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1653–1662.
38.
DienerE.SeligmanM. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological science, 13(1), 81–84.
39.
DittoP. H.MastronardeA. J. (2009). The paradox of the political maverick. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 295–298.
40.
DyckA.AdairM.ZingalesL. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud?Journal of Finance, 65, 2213–2254.
41.
EisenbergA. P. (2000). The search for integrity: A leadership impact study. Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Information & Learning.
42.
FiskeA. P.TetlockP. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18(2), 255–297.
43.
FrimanP. C.WoodsD. W.FreemanK. A.GilmanR.ShortM.McGrathA. M.. (2004). Relationships between tattling, likeability, and social classification: A preliminary investigation of adolescents in residential care. Behavior Modification, 28, 331–348.
44.
GarrigaE., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.
45.
GinoF.PierceL. (2009a). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1153–1160.
46.
GinoF.PierceL. (2009b). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142–155.
47.
GinoF.PierceL. (2010). Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 89–103.
48.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
49.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
50.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.
51.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
52.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
53.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.
54.
HammanJ.RickS.WeberR. A. (2007). Solving coordination failure with ‘all-or-none’ group-level incentives. Experimental Economics, 10(3), 285–303.
55.
HamannK.WarnekenF.GreenbergJ. R.TomaselloM. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476(7360), 328–331.
56.
HamlinJ. K.WynnK.BloomP.MahajanN. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 19931–19936.
57.
HareR. D.NeumannC. S. (2005). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York: Guilford.
58.
HegtvedtK. A.KillianC. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78(1), 269–302.
59.
IngramG. P. D.BeringJ. M. (2010). Children’s tattling: The reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings. Child Development, 81, 945–957.
60.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.
61.
Kish-GephartJ. J.HarrisonD. A.TreviñoL. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
62.
KohlbergL. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to Socialization. In GoslinD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.
63.
KohlbergL. (1981). Essays on moral development, Volume 1: The philosophy of moral development. New York: Harper Row.
64.
LedgerwoodA.TropeY.ChaikenS. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51.
65.
LuguriJ. B.NapierJ. L.DovidioJ. F. (2012). Reconstruing intolerance abstract thinking reduces conservatives’ prejudice against nonnormative groups. Psychological Science, 23(7), 756–763.
66.
MahajanN.MartinezM. A.GutierrezN. L.DiesendruckG.BanajiM. R.SantosL. (2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 387–405.
67.
MazarN.AggarwalP. (2011). Greasing the palm: Can collectivism promote bribery?Psychological Science, 22(7), 843–848.
68.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.
69.
MeierB. P.HinszV. B. (2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual–intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 551–559.
70.
MessickD. M.BazermanM. H. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37, 9–22.
71.
MikhailJ. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152.
72.
MinsonJ. A.MoninB. (2012). Do-gooder derogation: Putting down morally-motivated others to defuse implicit moral reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 200–207.
73.
MoninB.MerrittA. (2012). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. In MerrittA.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 167–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
74.
MoninB.SawyerP. J.MarquezM. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93.
75.
MooreD. A.TetlockP. E.TanluL.BazermanM. H. (2006). Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 10–29.
76.
MorrisonR. (2004). Information relationships in the workplace: Association with job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intentions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 114–128.
77.
NapierJ. L.LuguriJ. B. (2013). Moral mind-sets abstract thinking increases a preference for ‘individualizing’ over ‘binding’ moral foundations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 754–759.
78.
NearJ. P.MiceliM. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.
79.
NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899.
80.
NiemiL.YoungL. (2013). Caring across boundaries versus keeping boundaries intact: Links between moral values and interpersonal orientations. PloS one, 8(12), e81605 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081605.
81.
OlsonK. R.SpelkeE. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222–231.
82.
OrdonezL.ConnollyT.CoughlanR. (2000). Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 329–344.
83.
ParksC. D.StoneA. B. (2010). The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 303–310.
84.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
85.
RandD. G.GreeneJ. D.NowakM. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.
86.
Reed IIA.AquinoK. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286.
87.
RortyR. (1997). Justice as a larger loyalty. In BonketoeR.StepaniantsM. (Eds), Justice and democracy: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 9–22). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
88.
ShawA.DeScioliP.OlsonK. R. (2012). Fairness versus favoritism in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 736–745.
89.
ShawA.MontinariN.PiovesanM.OlsonK. R.GinoF.NortonM. I. (2013). Children develop a veil of fairness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 363–375.
90.
ShwederR. A.MuchN. C.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering. In BrandtA.RozinP. (Eds), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York, NY: Routledge.
91.
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.PatrickC. J.LilienfeldS. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95–162.
92.
SloaneS.BaillargeonR.PremackD. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness?Psychological Science, 23, 196–204.
93.
SmetanaJ. G.KillenM.TurielE. (1991). Children’s reasoning about interpersonal and moral conflicts. Child Development, 62, 629–644.
94.
SylwesterK.RobertsG. (2010). Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games. Biology Letters, 6(5), 659–662.
95.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2003). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
96.
TenbrunselA. E.MessickD. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236.
97.
TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D.McCabeD. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.
98.
TreviñoL. K.WeaverG. R.ReynoldsS. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of management, 32(6), 951–990.
99.
TreviñoL. K.YoungbloodS. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.
100.
TriversR. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.
101.
TsangJ. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50.
102.
ValdesoloP.DeStenoD. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18(8), 689–690.
103.
VerplaetseJ.VannesteS.BraeckmanJ. (2007). You can judge a book by its cover: The sequel. A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 260–271.
104.
VohsK. D.MeadN. L.GoodeM. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154–1156.
105.
VohsK. D.MeadN. L.GoodeM. R. (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208–212.
106.
WalkerL. J.HennigK. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 629–647.
107.
WaytzA.DunganJ.YoungL. (2013). The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1027–1033.
108.
WaytzA.EpleyN. (2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 70–76.
109.
WeberJ.WasieleskiD. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business & Society, 40(1), 79–110.
110.
WildschutT.PinterB.VeveaJ. L.InskoC. A.SchoplerJ. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual–intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological bulletin, 129(5), 698–722.
111.
WiltermuthS. S. (2011). Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 157–168.
112.
WrightJ. C.BarilG. (2011). The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1007–1012.
113.
ZakiJ.MitchellJ. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19761–19766.
114.
ZakiJ.MitchellJ. P. (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466–470.
115.
ZhongC. B.BohnsV. K.GinoF. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314.
