In this article, I consider financial economics as an artistic science in which interpretation plays a key role. After having reminded the importance of the Efficient Market Hypothesis [EMH] in the development of institutional frameworks, we present EMH as a work of art—we illustrate this point by considering EMH as an ironic and a non-representative art in which the theoretical picture tends to replace the reality (thanks to technology). This process leads to the creation of a ‘hyper-reality’ that is paradoxically unable to predict or to explain the financial reality. In line with a postmodernist perspective of science, I claim here that financial economics and technology are used not to describe or to better understand the financial reality but rather to invent it.
Chane-AluneE. (2006). Accounting standardization and governance structures. Working paper no. 0609. University of Liège, Liège.
10.
ChomskyN. (1973). Conditions on ransformations’. In AndersonS.R.KiparskyP. (Eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11.
ChomskyN. (1977). Essays on form and interpretation. Amsterdam: North Holland.
12.
ClaessensS.GlaessnerT.KlingebielD. (2002). E-finance in emerging markets: Is leapfrogging possible?. Financial Markets Institutions & Instruments, 11, 2–125.
13.
CollingwoodR. (1958). The principles of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
DucasseC. (2004). Philosophy of art. London: Kessinger Publishing Co.
15.
DupuyJ.-P. (1992). Libéralisme et justice sociale: Le sacrifice et l’envie. Paris: Hachette.
16.
EinsteinA. (1931). Philosophies. New York: Simon Schuster.
17.
EcoU. (1990). Travel in hyper-reality. London: Harvest Books.
18.
FamaE. (1965). Random walk in stock market price. Financial Analyst Journal. 21(5), 29–40.
19.
FamaE. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
20.
FamaE. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. A Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 283–306.
21.
FamaEugene F.FrenchKenneth R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
22.
FeyerabendP. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
23.
FeyerabendP. (1987). Farewell to reason. London: Verso Books.
24.
FeyerabendP. (2003). La science en tant qu’art. Paris: Albin Michel.
25.
FourcadeM. (2009). Economists and societies. Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
FourcadeM.RakeshK. (2009). From social control to financial economics: The linked ecologies of economics and business in twentieth century America. In CamicC.GrossN.LamontM. (Eds), Making, Evaluating, and Using Social Science Knowledge: The Underground of Pratice. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
27.
FrankfurterG.McGounE. (1996). The methodology of finance: What it is and What it can be. Londres: JAI Press.
28.
FrankfurterG.McGounE. (1999). Ideology and the theory of financial economics, Economic behavior & organisation, 39, 159–177.
29.
GilletR. (1999). L’efficience des marchés. Paris: Economica.
30.
GilliesD. (1998). The Duhem thesis and the Quine thesis. In CurdM.CoverJ. (Eds), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (pp.302–319). New York: Norton.
HaavelmoT. (1944). The probability approach in econometrics, Econometrica, 12 (Special Issue), 115 pages.
33.
HammerH.GroeberX. (2007). Efficient market hypothesis and class action securities regulation. International Journal of Business Research, 1, 1–14.
34.
HamonJ. (1997). Microstructure des marchés. In SimonY. (Ed.) Encyclopédie des Marchés Financiers. Paris: Economica.
35.
HoyleF. (1987). Mathematics of Evolution. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.
36.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2009). Lessons of the financial crisis for future regulation of financial institutions and markets and for liquidity management. Monetary and capital markets department.
37.
JensenM. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(2/3), 95–101.
38.
JovanovicF. (2002). Instruments et théorie économiques dans la construction de la science de la Bourse d’Henri Lefévre. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, Vol. 7, pp. 41–88.
39.
JovanovicF. (2008). The construction of the canonical history of financial economics. History of Political Economy, 40(2), 213–242.
40.
KastR. (1991). Rationalité et Marchés Financiers. Paris: Economica.
41.
KellnerD. (1997). Jean Baudrillard Encyclopedia. Los Angeles: Stanford.
42.
KivyP. (2002). The Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
LatourB. (2005). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
44.
Le GallP. (2007). A history of econometrics in France. London: Routledge.
45.
Le GallP. (2008). L’économie est-elle une science fiction? — Récit et fiction en modélisation économique et en art. Working Paper, A University of Angers, Angers.
46.
LeonardR. (1999). Seeing is believing: Otto Neurath, graphic art and the social order. In Marchi &N.GoodwinC., (Eds), Economic Engagements with Art. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, 31, 452–478.
47.
LyotardJ-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne (The Postmodern Condition). Paris: Editions de Minuit.
MantegnaR.StanleyE. (2000). An introduction to econophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
McCauleyJ. (2004). Dynamics of Markets: Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press.
51.
McGounE. (1992). The CAPM: A nobel failure. Critical perspectives on accounting, 3, 155–177.
52.
MignonV. (1998). Marchés financiers et modélisation des rentabilités boursières. Paris: Economica.
53.
MuniesaF. (2000). Un robot walrasien. Cotation électronique et justesse de la découverte des prix. Politix, 13, 121–154.
54.
NERA Economic Consulting. (2003). Fraud on the market meets behavioral finance. December, New York.
55.
OrléanA. (1999). Le pouvoir de la finance. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
56.
OrléanA. (2005). Réflexions sur l’hypothèse d’objectivité de la valeur fondamentale dans la théorie financière moderne. In BourghelleD.BrandouyO.GilletR.OrléanA. (Eds), Croyances, Représentations Collectives et Conventions en Finance (pp. 19–42). Paris: Economica.
57.
PoitrasG. (2000). The early history of financial economics 1478–1776. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
58.
PolanyiM. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
59.
QuineW.V. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
RortyR. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
61.
RossS. (2004). Neoclassical finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
62.
SajterD.ĆorićT. (2009). (I)rationality of Investors on Croatian Stock Market. EFZG Working Papers Series 0901. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Zagreb.
63.
SchinckusC. (2007). Rorty: Critique davidsonienne du réalisme putnamien. Tracés, Special Issue dedicated to Relativism, April, ENS Lyon Editions.
64.
SchinckusC. (2008a). Modèles mathématiques et schizophrénie épistémologique en finance. In JustensD. (Ed.), Attentes d’un modèle mathématique pragmatisme de l’économie et contraintes de la théorie, (2008). Brussels: Ferrer Press.
65.
SchinckusC. (2008b). The financial simulacrum. Journal of Socio-Economics, 73(3), 1076–1089.
66.
SchinckusC. (2009a). Theoretical diversification in financial markets: Towards new perspectives of uncertainty. PhD dissertation. University of Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris.
67.
SchinckusC. (2009b). The financial market as communicative arena. Working Paper. FacultÈs St-Louis, Brussels.
68.
SéjournéB. (2006). Pourquoi le comportement des épargnants français est-il si peu conforme à la théorie traditionnelle du portefeuille?Cahier Scientifique de l’AMF, Septembre.
69.
ShillerR. (2003). The new financial order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
70.
ShleiferA. (2000). Inefficient Markets: An introduction to behavioral finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
SorosG. (2003). The alchemy of finance. New York: Wiley Press.
72.
StengersI. (1993). L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris: Flammarion.
73.
TadjeddineY. (2000). Les prises cognitives de la rationalité. Une typologie des décisions spéculatives. Politix, 52, 57–71.
74.
WhitmanM. (2007). Are markets always efficient? Q2, Fall, Working paper, Yale School of Management, Yale University.
75.
WalterC. (1996). Les impossibles de la finance. Pour la Science, 225, 6–9.
