This brief paper outlines the basis of the criticisms of the principle of profit maximization. Further it attempts to assess the validity of the criticisms of the principle of profit maximization as it relates to theory of the firm. Its conclusion is that there is no evidence of a single and comprehensive alternative model or theory that inclusively cover firms working under different market conditions such as perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumalW.J., (1966), Business behaviour, value and growth. Revised edition, Chapter 6, Princeton, NJ, April.
2.
CyertR.M and MarchJ.B. (1992), A Behaviour theory of the firm: Chapters 2 and 3, Prentice Hall.
3.
MachlupF. (1967), “Theories of the firm: marginalist, behavioural, and managerial”, American Economic Review, March, 1–33.
4.
MarrisR.L. (1968), The economic theory of managerial capitalism, Basic books, NY, 106–109.
5.
RothschildK.W. (1974), “Price theory and oligopoly”. The Economic Journal, September299–320.
6.
ScitovskyT. (1943), “A note on profit maximization and implications”. The Review of Economic Studies, 11(1), 57–60.
7.
SimonH.A. (1955), “A behaviour model of rational choice”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 99–114.
8.
SimonH.A. (1959) “Theories of decision making in economic and behavioural sciences”. American Economic Review, June, 253–283.
9.
WilliamsonO.E. (1963), “A model of rational managerial behaviour” in CyertR.M and MarchJ.B, A Behaviour theory of the firm, Prentice Hall, 237–252.
