Vitamin D in the news: A call for clear public health messaging during Covid-19

Abstract

Background: The public are increasingly reliant on the internet and media to access healthcare related information during the Covid-19 pandemic. Vitamin D is essential for musculoskeletal and immune health, with daily supplementation advised by public health bodies. Several studies assessing a possible link between vitamin D and Covid-19 severity have arrived at conflicting results and news articles have been rapidly disseminating such research to the public. There has been little focus on studying the quality of information available. Aim: To identify if online search interest in vitamin D increased with pandemic burden and analyse the accuracy of public health messaging relating to vitamin D in online news articles. Methods: Online search interest data for vitamin D was correlated with pandemic burden, defined as the number of Covid-19 deaths. Online news articles discussing vitamin D and Covid-19 were analysed using qualitative coding. Results: Online search interest for vitamin D increased as pandemic burden increased (p < 0.0001, Spearman's rank). Of the 72 articles identified, most (50%) offered a mixed opinion on the benefit of vitamin D in Covid-19. From articles making a recommendation for vitamin D supplementation, 23% of articles gave mixed messaging or advised against supplementation. 16% of articles recommended a dose which exceeded the safe limit of 4000 IU/day, risking toxicity. Conclusion: A significant number of articles provided mixed messaging or incorrectly advised supratherapeutic doses. This study highlights an opportunity for public health bodies to utilise the increased interest in vitamin D during the pandemic to raise awareness with accurate information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bassatne

Basbous

Chakhtoura

, et al. (2021) The link between COVID-19 and Vitamin D (VIVID): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 119: 154753.

Breslow

(2021) Mixed messaging on masks set U.S. public health response back. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/07/01/886299190/it-does-not-have-to-be-100-000-cases-a-day-fauci-urges-u-s-to-follow-guidelines (accessed 9 March 2021).

Carpenter

Geryk

Chen

, et al. (2015) Conflicting health information: a critical research need. Health Expectations 19(6): 1173–1182.

Chang

(2015) Motivated processing. Science Communication 37(5): 602–634.

Day

Krishnarao

Sahota

, et al. (2019) We still don’t know that our children need vitamin D daily: a study of parents’ understanding of vitamin D requirements in children aged 0-2 years. BMC Public Health 19(1): 1119.

EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies) (2016) Scientific opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D. EFSA J 14: 4547.

Elstad

Carpenter

Devellis

, et al. (2012) Patient decision making in the face of conflicting medication information. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 7(1): 18523.

Institute for Government (2021) Timeline of UK coronavirus lockdowns. Available at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/timeline-lockdown-web.pdf (accessed 9 March 2021).

Islam

Sarkar

Khan

, et al. (2020) COVID-19–related infodemic and its impact on public health: a global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103(4): 1621–1629.

10.

Janz

Becker

(1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Education Quarterly 11(1): 1–47.

11.

Lanham-New

Webb

Cashman

, et al. (2020) Vitamin D and SARS-CoV-2 virus/COVID-19 disease. BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health 3(1): 106–110.

12.

Lee

Nagler

Wang

(2017) Source-specific exposure to contradictory nutrition information: documenting prevalence and effects on adverse cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Health Communication 33(4): 453–461.

13.

Murdaca

Pioggia

Negrini

(2020) Vitamin D and COVID-19: an update on evidence and potential therapeutic implications. Clinical and Molecular Allergy 18(1): 23.

14.

Nadella

Navathe

(2020) The media needs to incorporate principles of research communication to improve COVID-19 reporting. Healthcare 8(4): 100473.

15.

Nagler

Vogel

Gollust

, et al. (2020) Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults. PLOS ONE 15(10): e0240776.

16.

Nagler

Yzer

Rothman

(2018) Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: results from a population-based survey experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 53(10): 896–908.

17.

Nair

Maseeh

(2012) Vitamin D: the “sunshine” vitamin. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 3(2): 118–126.

18.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2020a) COVID-19 rapid guideline: vitamin D. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng187/resources/covid19-rapid-guideline-vitamin-d-pdf-66142026720709 (Accessed 9 March 2021).

19.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2020b) Vitamin D deficiency in adults - treatment and prevention. Available at: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/vitamin-d-deficiency-in-adults-treatment-prevention/management/management/ (accessed 9 March 2021).

20.

Office of Dietary Supplements (2021) Vitamin D. Available at: https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/ (accessed 9 March 2021).

21.

Raamkumar

Tan

Wee

(2020) Use of health belief model–based deep learning classifiers for COVID-19 social Media content to examine public perceptions of physical distancing: model development and case study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6(3): e20493.

22.

Schneider

Dryhurst

Kerr

, et al. (2021) COVID-19 risk perception: a longitudinal analysis of its predictors and associations with health protective behaviours in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research 24(3-4): 294–313.

23.

Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) (2016) Vitamin D and health. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/537616/SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report.pdf (accessed 9 March 2021).

24.

Stroobant

(2018) Finding the news and mapping the links: a case study of hypertextuality in Dutch-language health news websites. Information, Communication & Society 22(14): 2138–2155.

25.

Taylor

Davies

(2018) A review of the growing risk of vitamin D toxicity from inappropriate practice. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 84(6): 1121–1127.

26.

Tsao

Chen

Tisseverasinghe

, et al. (2021) What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review. The Lancet Digital Health 3(3): e175–e194.

27.

Webster

(2020) Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19. The Lancet 395(10231): 1180–1181.

28.

Wong

Sam

(2010) Temporal changes in psychobehavioral responses during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Preventive Medicine 51(1): 92–93.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB