BachEmmon. 1964. An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
2.
BallardD.LeeRobert J. ConradLongacreRobert E.1971. “The deep and surface grammar of interclausal relations.”Foundations of Language, 7. 70–118.
3.
ChafeWallace L.1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
ChomskyNoam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
5.
ChomskyNoam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): M.I.T. Press.
6.
ElsonBenjamin A.PickettVelma B.1962. An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Santa Ana, Calif.: SIL.
7.
FillmoreCharles J.1967. “The case for case”, in BachE.HarmsR., eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston), pp. 1–88.
8.
FillmoreCharles J.1968. “Lexical entries for verbs.”Foundations of Languages4. 373–393.
9.
GleasonH. A.1964. “The organization of language: a stratificational view”, in StuartC. I. J. M., ed., Report of the Fifteenth (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University).
10.
HallidayM. A. K.1970. “Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English.”Foundations of Language, 6. 322–361.
11.
HjelmslevLouis. 1953. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Language” (translated by WhitefieldF. J. from Omkring sprogteoriens grundlaeggelse, 1943). Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics. Memoir 7, International Journal of American Linguistics.
12.
JackendoffRay S.1969. “An interpretive theory of negation.”Foundations of Language5. 28–241.
13.
HjelmslevLouis1971. “Modal structure in semantic representation.”Linguistic Inquiry2. 479–514.
LakoffGeorge. 1971. “Presupposition and relative well-formedness”, in SteinbergDanny D.JakobovitsLeon A., eds., Semantics (Cambridge: The University Press), pp. 329–340.
LakoffRobin. 1969. “Some reasons why there can't be any some-any rule”. Language45. 608–615.
18.
LakoffRobin1970. “Tense and its relation to participants”. Language70.838–849.
19.
LambSydney M.1966. Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
20.
LambSydney M.1969. Linguistic and Cognitive Networks. New Haven: Linguistic Automation Project, Yale University.
21.
LangendoenTerenceD.1969. The Study of Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
22.
LeesRobert B.1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington (Indiana): Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.
23.
LongacreRobert E.1968. Discourse, Paragraph, and Sentence Structure in Selected Philippine Languages, Vol. I, II, III. Washington, D.C: Institute of International Studies, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
24.
LongacreRobert E.1970. “Sentence structure as a statement calculus.”Language46.783–815.
25.
McCawleyJames D.1968. “The role of semantics in a grammar”, in BachE.HarmsR., eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston), pp. 125–169.
26.
McCawleyJames D.1971. “Where do noun phrases come from?” in SteinbergDanny D.JakobovitsLeon A., eds., Semantics (Cambridge: At the University Press), pp. 217–231.
27.
NidaEugene A.1964. Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
28.
NidaEugene A.TaberCharles R.1969. Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
PikeKenneth L.1962. “Dimensions of grammatical constructions”. Languages38.221–245.
31.
ReichPeter A.1968. The English Auxiliaries: a Relational Network Description. New Haven: Linguistic Automation Project, Yale University.
32.
RossJohn Robert. 1966. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization, To Honor Roman Jakobson. (The Hague: Mouton), pp. 1669–1682.
33.
RozentsveigV.1971. “Models in Soviet linguistics.”Social Sciences (USSR Academy of Sciences)3.82–94.
34.
StennesLeslie H.1969. “The Identification of Participants in Adamawa Fulani.”Hartford (Conn.): Hartford Seminary Foundation, Hartford Series in Linguistics, No. 24.
35.
TaberCharles R.1966. “The Structure of Sango Narrative.”Hartford, Conn.: The Hartford Seminary Foundation, Hartford Studies in Linguistics, No. 17, parts I and II.