AicheleGeorge, et al. 1995. The Postmodern Bible. New haven: Yale University Press.
2.
AicheleGeorgeMiscallPeter and WalshRichard. 2009. “An Elephant in the Room: Historical-critical and Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible.’ Journal of Biblical Literature128: 383–404.
3.
ApplebyJoyceHuntLynn and JacobMargaret. 1994. Telling the Truth about History. New York: W.W. Norton & company.
4.
BarrJames. 1999. The Concept of Biblical Theology: An Old Testament Perspective. London: SCM.
5.
BultmannRudolf. 1958. Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
6.
CollinsJohn J.2005. The Bible after Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
7.
De JongeHenk Jan. 2008. “The Historical Method of Biblical Interpretation: Its Nature, Use, Origin and Limitations.’ Pages 135–51 in The Study of Religion and the Training of Muslim Clergy in Europe: Academic and Religious Freedom in the 21st Century. Edited by DreesWillem B. and van KoningsveldSjoerd Pieter. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
8.
De RuyterB. W. J.1998. De gemeente van de evangelist Johannes: haar polemiek en haar geschiedenis. Delft: Eburon. (English summary, 198–203.)
9.
De VriesLourens. 2001. “Bible Translations: Forms and Functions.’ The Bible Translator52.3: 306–19.
10.
EvansRichard J.2000. In Defence of History. 2nd ed.London: Granta Books.
11.
FreiHans W.1974. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
GadamerHans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method. 2nd ed.London: Continuum.
13.
GreeneColin and RobinsonMartin. 2008. Metavista: Bible, Church and Mission in an Age of Imagination. Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
14.
HarrisvilleRoy A. and SundbergWalter. 2002. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs. 2nd ed.Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
15.
HirschE. D.1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
KochDieter-Alex. 2001. “The Early History of the Lord's Supper: Response to Henk Jan de Jonge.’ Pages 238–52 in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition. Edited by van HentenWillem Jan and HoutepenAnton. STAR 3. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
17.
MorganRobert with BartonJohn. 1988. Biblical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
NeillStephen and WrightTom. 1988. The Interpretation of the New Testament 1861–1986. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
OmansonRoger L.1992. “Translating the Anti-Jewish Bias of the New Testament.’ The Bible Translator43.3: 301–313.
20.
O'NeillJ. C.1991. The Bible's Authority: A Portrait Gallery of Thinkers from Lessing to Bultmann. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
21.
RäisänenHeikki. 2000. Beyond New Testament Theology: A Story and a Programme. 2nd ed.London: SCM Press.
22.
RäisänenHeikki. 2001. “Biblical Critics in the Global Village.’ Pages 283–309 in Challenges to Biblical Interpretation: Collected Essays, 1991–2000. By RäisänenHeikki. Biblical Interpretation Series, 59. Leiden: Brill. This article is a slightly revised version of Räisänen's contribution in Räisänen et al. 2000.
23.
RäisänenHeikki, et al. 2000. Reading the Bible in the Global Village: Helsinki. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
24.
ReventlowHenning Graf. 2001. Epochen der Bibelauslegung. Band IV. Von der Aufklärung bis zum 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: C. H. Beck.
25.
StendahlKrister. 2008. Meanings: The Bible as Document and as Guide. 2nd ed.Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
26.
SugirtharajahR. S.2000. “Critics, Tools, and the Global Arena.’ Pages 49–60 in Räisänen et al. 2000.
27.
Van SetersJohn. 2009. “A Response to G. Aichele, P. Miscall and R. Walsh, ‘An Elephant in the Room: Historical-critical and Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible.’” Journal of Hebrew Scriptures9.26: 2–13.