KilpatrickGeorge D.1963. “Atticism and the Text of the Greek New Testament.’ Pages 125–37 in Neutestamentliche Aufsätze. Edited by BlinzlerJ., KussO. and MußnerF.Regensburg: Pustet.
7.
KilpatrickGeorge D.1965. “The Greek New Testament Text of Today and the Textus Receptus.’ Pages 189–208 in The New Testament in Historical and Contemporary Perspective. Edited by AndersonH. and BarclayW.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
8.
KilpatrickGeorge D.1990. The Principles and Practice of New Testament Textual Criticism. Edited by ElliottJ. K.Leuven: Peeters.
9.
LevinsohnS. H.2000. Discourse Features of New Testament Greek.2d ed.Dallas: International Academic Bookstore.
10.
NeirynckFrans, ed. 1974. The Minor Agreements of Matthew and Luke against Mark with a Cumulative List. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
11.
NeviusRichard C.1967. The Divine Names in the GospelsStudies & Documents 30. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
12.
OsburnCarroll D.1983. “The Historical Present in Mark as a Text-Critical Criterion.’ Biblica64: 486–500.
13.
PorterStanley E.1989. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with Reference to Tense and Mood. New York: Peter Lang.
14.
RahlfsA., ed. 1935. Septuaginta. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
15.
SandersE. P.1969. The Tendencies of the Synoptic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
TaylorVincent. 1966. The Gospel According to St. Mark.2d ed.London: Macmillan.
17.
ThackerayH. S. J.1921. The Septuagint and Jewish Worship. London: Oxford University Press.
18.
WeissB.1899. Textkritik der vier Evangelien. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.
