After 50 years of Independence Orissa is all poised to take a place on the industrial map of India. Setting up new industries in greenfield areas is a mammoth task. What adds to the difficulty of such projects is acquiring land, evacuating the people, and providing them with alternative employment and rehabilitation. This article attempts to discuss the problem of rehabilitation. It deals with the factors that are potential impediments to any programme of rehabilitation and then proposes a working model as a possible guideline for the major industries setting up greenfield projects in Orissa.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chowdhury, ‘Tribes and Development’, Orissa Today, An Annual Survey, p. 43 (1996).
2.
MehtaS R, Rural Development Policies & Programmes: A Sociological Perspective, Delhi, Sage Publications, 1984, p. 5.
3.
MishraS N, ‘Dynamics and Dimensions of Panchayati Raj Elections’. The Indian Journal of Public AdministrationVol. XXXVII, No. 3, p. 341 (1991).
4.
MishraS NMishraSweta, ‘Political Process & Political Parties in India: Retrospect and Prospect’, The Indian Journal of Public Administration, Vol XL, No 3, p. 443, 1994.
5.
NarayanIqbal, “Democratic Decentralization: The Idea, The Image and the Reality” in JainR B (ed), Panchayati Raj, New Delhi, Indian Institute of Public Administration, p. 27, 1981.
6.
RaghavuluC VNarayanaE A, ‘Reforms in Panchayati Raj: A Comparative Analysis of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and West Bengal’. The Indian Journal of Public AdministrationVol. XXXVII, No. 1 p. 34, 1991.
7.
Strategy for Development of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in Orissa, Bhubaneswar.Centre for Regional Studies, Utkal University, 1982.
