End-of-term course evaluations often use multiple-choice questions asking students to evaluate their experience with the class. Students are also asked to give an overall score to the instructor and to the course. To help instructors interpret the scores and work to improve their evaluations, we looked at 16 descriptive statements in 2,048 evaluations of course sections over a span of 4 years. Cluster analyses revealed that the course score related the most to Cluster 2 statements (feedback and challenge) and the instructor score to Cluster 4 statements (clear and stimulating presentations). We then analysed these specific clusters in more detail to provide specific recommendations to faculty on how to improve their student evaluation of teaching scores using this output.
Overall, our study revealed several critical benefits of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Key findings include: (a) clear and informative teaching helps decrease student stress; (b) encouraging students to set and achieve challenging goals promotes personal and academic growth, and the fact that (c) students want to feel challenged, so they can grow.
We discuss the implications of our findings and offer suggestions for future research.
AleamoniL. M. (1999). Student ratings myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(2), 153–166.
2.
Al-HageryM. A., AlzaidH., & HussainS. (2020). The impact of e-learning systems on student performance using educational data mining. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09942-8
3.
AlshareK. A., Al-SholiH. Y., ShadidO. R., & MoqbelM. (2024). College professor perceptions of effective professor characteristics: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Education for Business, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2024.2306245
4.
AndersonH. M., CainJ., & BirdE. (2005). Online course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69(1), 34–43.
5.
BharadwajS., FutrellC. M., & KantakD. M. (1993). Using student evaluations to improve learning. Marketing Education Review, 3(2), 16–21.
6.
BraskampL. A., & OryJ. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. Jossey-Bass.
7.
BrightmanH. J. (2005). Mentoring faculty to improve teaching and student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(2), 191–203.
8.
CaudillD. W., & SlaterP. J. (2024). Content analysis and ranking model of research related to qualities of excellent college teaching: Implications for business educators. Journal of Education for Business, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2299430
9.
CayubitR. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environment Research, 25, 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
10.
ChapmanL., & LudlowL. (2010). Can downsizing college class sizes augment student outcomes? An investigation of the effects of class size on student learning. Journal of General Education, 59(2), 105–123.
11.
ClaysonD. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature,Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 16–30.
12.
EatonR. (2024, January). What happens when students have more chances to master concepts. Harvard Business Publishing Education.
13.
FeldmanK. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II—Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34(2), 151–211.
14.
FerlazzoL., (2023). The student motivation handbook: 50 ways to boost an intrinsic desire to learn. Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
15.
FisherC., VuP., & LaiP. (2022). Faculty course evaluations and class size. Active Learning in Higher Education, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221126
16.
FisherD. P., BrottoG., LimI., & SouthamC. (2025). The impact of timely formative feedback on university student motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2449891
17.
GalbraithC. S., MerrillG. B., & KlineD. M. (2012). Are student evaluations of teaching effectiveness valid for measuring student learning outcomes in business-related classes? Neural and Bayesian analyses. Research in Higher Education, 53(3), 353–374.
18.
GreenwaldA. G., & GillmoreG. M. (1997). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 743–751.
19.
GuderF., & MalliarisM. (2010). Online and paper evaluations. American Journal of Business Education, 3(2), 131–137.
20.
GuderF., MalliarisM., & JalilvandA. (2009). Changing the culture of a school: The effect of larger class size on instructor and student performance. American Journal of Business Education, 2(9), 83–89.
21.
GuoQ., ZhangX., LiY., & WangJ. (2022). Student grouping and course recommendation based on clustering and learning behavior analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10153–10172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11043-9
22.
HippensteelS. P., & MartinW. (2005). Increasing the significance of course evaluations in large-enrollment geoscience classes. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(2), 158–165.
23.
HooshyassrM., YousefiM., & Sadeghi-NiarakiA.2019, Clustering students based on learning behaviors to predict academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2241–2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09880-5
24.
HussainS., DahanN. A., Ba-AlwiF. M., & RibataN. (2018). Educational data mining and analysis of students’ academic performance using clustering techniques. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2049–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9696-2
25.
JohnsonV. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. Springer.
26.
KaplanM., MetsL. A., & CookC. E. (2000). Questions frequently asked about student ratings forms: Summary of research findings. CRLT. http://www.crlt.umich.edu/tstrategies/studentratingfaq.html
27.
KemberD., LeungD. Y. P., & KwanK. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 411–425.
28.
LayneB., DeCristoforoJ., & McGintyD. (1999). Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instructions. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 221–232.
29.
LiY., ZhangX., GuoQ., & WangJ. (2021). Discovering student learning behavior patterns through clustering analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10258-6
30.
MacedoJ., VieiraS. M., & SousaJ. M. C. (2019). Student dropout prediction in higher education using data mining techniques. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9773-6
31.
MacfadyenL. P., & DawsonS. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an ‘early warning system’ for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008
32.
MallikA., SahooS., & PandaS. K. (2019). Analyzing student performance using clustering techniques in educational data mining. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10285
33.
MarshH. W., & DunkinM. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 143–233). Agathon.
34.
MarshH. W., & RocheL. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders?Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.202
35.
McPhersonM. A., JewellT. R., & KimM. (2009). What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. Eastern Economic Journal, 35(1), 37–51.
36.
MengelF., SauermannJ., & ZolitzU. (2019). Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(2), 535–566.
37.
MorganJ., & DaviesT. (2006). Analysis of bias in student evaluations of faculty at an all-female Arab university in the Middle East. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 3(2), 1–20.
38.
NafuriM., AlkhateebF., & Al-MasriM. (2022). Identifying low-performing students using clustering techniques for early academic intervention. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8945–8964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11011-3
39.
NarayananA., SawayaW. J.III, & JohnsonM. D. (2014). Analysis of differences in nonteaching factors influencing student evaluation of teaching between engineering and business classrooms. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 12(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12035
40.
NargundkarS., & ShrikhandeM. (2012). An empirical investigation of student evaluations of instruction: The relative importance of factors. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 10(1), 117–135.
41.
PetersonR. L., BerensonM. L., MisraR. B., & RadosevichD. J. (2008). An evaluation of factors regarding students’ assessment of faculty in a business school. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00182.x
42.
QuyV. T., NguyenT. T., PhamT. H., & TranD. H. (2023). A systematic review of clustering techniques in educational data mining, Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12263–12297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11652-4
43.
RemmersH. H., & BrandenburgG. C. (1927). Experimental data on the Purdue Rating Scale for Instruction. Educational Administration and Supervision, 13, 519–527.
44.
RothsteinD, SantanaL., & PuriefoyW. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press.
45.
SamuelL. M. (2019). Flipped pedagogy and student evaluations of teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874198551
46.
SchuckmanH. (1990). Students’ perceptions of faculty and graduate students as classroom teachers. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 162.
47.
ScrivenM. (2019). Student ratings offer useful input to teacher evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 4, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/1jfr-et33
48.
SmithC. (2008). Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: Connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 517–533.
49.
StumpfS. A., & FreedmanR. D. (1979). Expected grade covariation with student ratings of instruction: Individual versus class effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 293–302.
50.
VanMaarenV. G., JaquettC. M., & WilliamsR. L. (2016). Factors most likely to contribute to positive course evaluations. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9360-0
51.
YunkerP. J., & YunkerJ. A. (2003). Are student evaluations of teaching valid? Evidence from an analytical business core course. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598619
52.
ZabaletaF. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 55–76.
