Female labour force undeniably constitutes half of the human capital that drives the growth and development of emerging economies. Probing into determinants of female labour force participation decline has gathered momentum in recent past, but there has been no significant breakthrough in resolving the puzzle. Using World Bank’s database of female labour force participation rate of India and China, and the state-wise database for India, this article juxtaposes the intermodal transport trend to examine if the former can be explained by the latter. Decline of female labour force participation in India is a concern from both the demographic dividend aspect and the social inclusion aspect. Twenty-five years’ data of both China and India and 3 year’s data of 18 Indian states show this trend, and this article probes the mobility constraint as the reason behind this phenomenon. Results of this study indicate that lower rail-to-road ratio is exclusionary for women. The findings regarding gendering of mobility and employment would influence important policy towards planning intermodal transport and its share of total transport for a nation.
AfridiF., DinkelmanT., & MahajanK. (2018). Why are fewer married women joining the work force in rural India? A decomposition analysis over two decades. Journal of Population Economics, 31(3), 783–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0671-y
2.
AndresL. A., DasguptaB., JosephG., AbrahamV., & CorreiaM. (2017). Precarious drop: Reassessing patterns of female labor force participation in India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8024
3.
ArellanoM. (1993). On the testing of correlated effects with panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 59(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)90040-C
4.
AstropA. (1998, July30). The urban travel behavior and constraints of low income households and females in Pune, India. In Women’s Travel Issues Second National Conference Drachman Institute of the University of Arizona, Morgan State University, Federal Highway Administration. https://trid.trb.org/view/720102
5.
BalatchandiraneG. (2003). Gender discrimination in education and economic development: A study of South Korea, China and India. International Studies, 40(4), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170304000403
6.
BanerjeeA., & RajuS. (2009). Gendered mobility: Women migrants and work in Urban India. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(28), 115–123.
7.
BarraganS., ErogulM. S., & EssersC. (2018). ‘Strategic (dis)obedience’: Female entrepreneurs reflecting on and acting upon patriarchal practices. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12258
8.
BarsoumG. (2019). ‘Women, work and family’: Educated women’s employment decisions and social policies in Egypt. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(7), 895–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12285
9.
BhattacharyyaR. (2015). Understanding the spatialities of sexual assault against Indian women in India. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(9), 1340–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.969684
10.
BlumenbergE., & PierceG. (2017). The drive to work: The relationship between transportation access, housing assistance, and employment among participants in the Welfare to Work Voucher Program. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16633501
11.
BlundellR., DiasM. C., MeghirC., & ShawJ. (2016). Female labor supply, human capital, and welfare reform. Econometrica, 84(5), 1705–1753. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11576
12.
BoisjolyG., Moreno-MonroyA. I., & El-GeneidyA. (2017). Informality and accessibility to jobs by public transit: Evidence from the São Paulo Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.005
13.
BowenW. G., & FineganT. A. (2015). The economics of labor force participation. Princeton University Press.
14.
CasinowskyG. B. (2013). Working life on the move, domestic life at standstill? Work-related travel and responsibility for home and family. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00579.x
15.
CatsO., SusiloY. O., & ReimalT. (2017). The prospects of fare-free public transport: Evidence from Tallinn. Transportation, 44(5), 1083–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9695-5
16.
CeccatoV. (2017). Women’s victimisation and safety in transit environments. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 19(3–4), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0024-5
17.
ChantS., & McIlwaineC. (2015). Cities, slums and gender in the Global South: Towards a feminised urban future. Routledge.
ChatterjeeU., MurgaiR., & RamaM. (2015). Job opportunities along the rural-urban gradation and female labor force participation in India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7412
20.
ChiuC. Y., & ChenJ. (2013). Determinants of labor force participation of older married men in Taiwan. Economics Bulletin, 33(4), 3088–3101.
21.
ChurchA., FrostM., & SullivanK. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00024-X
22.
CraneR. (2007). Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708977979
23.
CrawleyA. (2014). The relationship between commuting time and workers’ utility. Applied Economics Letters, 21(18), 1273–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.922663
24.
CropperM., & SomaB. (2007). Public transport subsidies and affordability in Mumbai, India. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4395
25.
de MadariagaI. S., & ZucchiniE. (2019). Measuring mobilities of care, a challenge for transport agendas. In ScholtenC. L. & JoelssonT. (Eds.), Integrating gender into transport planning: From one to many tracks (pp. 145–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05042-9_7
26.
DesaiS., & JoshiO. (2019). The paradox of declining female work participation in an Era of economic growth. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00162-z
27.
DeSalvoJ. S., & HuqM. (2005). Mode choice, commuting cost, and urban household behavior. Journal of Regional Science, 45(3), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00381.x
28.
DobbsL. (2007). Stuck in the slow lane: Reconceptualizing the links between gender, transport and employment. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00334.x
29.
DodsonJ., GleesonB., EvansR., & SipeN. (2007). Investigating the social dimensions of transport disadvantage II: From concepts to methods through an empirical case study. Urban Policy and Research, 25(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140701225511
30.
DoyleJ., & NathanM. (2001). Wherever next: Work in a mobile world, the industrial society. CW Press.
31.
DubeyA., OlsenW., & SenK. (2017). The decline in the labour force participation of rural women in India: Taking a long-run view. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 60(4), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-017-0085-0
32.
EricksenJ. A. (1977). An analysis of the journey to work for women. Social Problems, 24(4), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/800136
33.
FainsteinS. S., & ServonL. J. (2005). Gender and planning: A reader. Rutgers University Press.
34.
FransenK., BoussauwK., DeruyterG., & De MaeyerP. (2019). The relationship between transport disadvantage and employability: Predicting long-term unemployment based on job seekers’ access to suitable job openings in Flanders, Belgium. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.023
35.
GekoskiA., GrayJ. M., AdlerJ. R., & HorvathM. A. H. (2017). The prevalence and nature of sexual harassment and assault against women and girls on public transport: An international review. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 3(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-08-2016-0016
36.
GoldinC. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history (Working Paper No. 4707). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w4707
37.
GopalK., & ShinE. J. (2019). The impacts of rail transit on the lives and travel experiences of women in the developing world: Evidence from the Delhi Metro. Cities, 88, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.008
38.
GottholmsederG., NowotnyK., PrucknerG. J., & TheurlE. (2009). Stress perception and commuting. Health Economics, 18(5), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1389
39.
GrünenfelderJ. (2013). Negotiating gender relations: Muslim women and formal employment in Pakistan’s rural development sector. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(6), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00609.x
40.
HamiltonK., & JenkinsL. (2000). A gender audit for public transport: A new policy tool in the tackling of social exclusion. Urban Studies, 37(10), 1793–1800. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080411
41.
HansonS. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903498225
42.
HansonS., & HansonP. (1980). Gender and urban activity patterns in Uppsala, Sweden. Geographical Review, 70(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/214257
43.
HaynesK. E. (1997). Labor markets and regional transportation improvements: The case of high-speed trains. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680050039
44.
HewlettS. A., & RashidR. (2011). Winning the war for talent in emerging markets: Why women are the solution. Harvard Business Press.
45.
HineJ. (2016, April22). Mobility and transport disadvantage. In UrryJ. (Ed.), Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315595733-7
46.
HoweA., & O’ConnorK. (1982). Travel to work and labor force participation of men and women in an Australian Metropolitan Area. The Professional Geographer, 34(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1982.00050.x
47.
HsiaoC. (2007). Panel data analysis—Advantages and challenges. TEST, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x
JonesP., & LucasK. (2012). The social consequences of transport decision-making: Clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.012
50.
JRTR Contents INDEX (No. 21). (n.d.). http://www.ejrcf.or.jp/jrtr/jrtr21/
51.
KapoorM. (2002). Vision 2020 Transport. Planning Commission/Government of India. New Delhi.
52.
LahotiR., & SwaminathanH. (2013). Economic growth and female labour force participation in India. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2284073
53.
LawR. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913299666161864
54.
LeeY. T. (2015). A comparative analysis of China and India: Ancient patriarchy, women’s liberation, and contemporary gender equity education. African and Asian Studies, 14(1–2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341244
55.
Livemint (2018, October30). 15 Indian cities where Metro train work is going on. https://www.livemint.com/Companies/jXD7k2n3NfbPGfqwtQOT3M/15-Indian-cities-where-Metro-train-work-is-going-on.html
56.
Losada-RojasL. L., GkartzonikasC., PyrialakouV. D., & GkritzaK. (2019). Exploring intercity passengers’ attitudes and loyalty to intercity passenger rail: Evidence from an on-board survey. Transport Policy, 73, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.011
57.
Loukaitou-SiderisA. (2016). A gendered view of mobility and transport: Next steps and future directions. Town Planning Review, 87(5), 547–566.
58.
LowsonE., & ArberS. (2014). Preparing, working, recovering: Gendered experiences of night work among women and their families. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12032
59.
LucasK., & MussoA. (2014). Policies for social inclusion in transportation: An introduction to the special issue. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2014.06.002
60.
MackieP. J., Jara-Dı́azS., & FowkesA. S. (2001). The value of travel time savings in evaluation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00013-2
61.
MaddenJ. F., & WhiteM. J. (1980). Spatial implications of increases in the female labor force: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. Land Economics, 56(4), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146219
62.
MahadeviaD., & AdvaniD. (2016). Gender differentials in travel pattern—The case of a mid-sized city, Rajkot, India. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.01.002
63.
MarkovichJ., & LucasK. (2011). The social and distributional impacts of transport: A literature review (Working Paper, 1055). Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment.
64.
MartinezD., MitnikO. A., SalgadoE., SchollL., & Yañez-PagansP. (2019). Connecting to economic opportunity? The role of public transport in promoting women’s employment in Lima (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3318780). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3318780
65.
MazumdarV. (1979). From research to policy: Rural women in India. Studies in Family Planning, 10(11/12), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966091
66.
MazumdarI., & NeethaN. (2011). Gender dimensions: Employment trends in India, 1993–94 to 2009–10. http://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/34239
67.
MehrotraS., & ParidaJ. K. (2017). Why is the labour force participation of women declining in India?World Development, 98, 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.003
68.
MohanD. (2002). Traffic safety and health in Indian cities. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=256365
69.
MohunR., BiswasS., JacobsonJ., & SajjadF. (2016). Infrastructure: A game changer for women’s economic empowerment (Background Paper). UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Women’s Economic Empowerment.
70.
NatarajanM. (2016). Rapid assessment of “eve teasing” (sexual harassment) of young women during the commute to college In India. Crime Science, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-016-0054-9
71.
NaykaS., & SridharK. S. (2019). Urban commuters in Indian States and Cities: Modes of transport and distances. Urbanisation, 2455747118816559. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455747118816559
72.
NeffD. F., SenK., & KlingV. (2012). The puzzling decline in rural women’s labor force participation in India: A reexamination (Working Paper, No. 196). GIGA.
73.
NoackE. (2011). Are rural women mobility deprived? A case study from Scotland. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(1), 79–97.
74.
OECD, ArnalE., & FörsterM. (2010). Growth, employment and inequality in Brazil, China, India and South Africa: An overview (pp. 13–55). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088368-3-en
75.
OstryM. J. D., AlvarezJ., EspinozaM. R. A., & PapageorgiouM. C. (2018). Economic gains from gender inclusion: New mechanisms, new evidence. International Monetary Fund.
76.
Oviedo HernandezD., & TitheridgeH. (2016). Mobilities of the periphery: Informality, access and social exclusion in the urban fringe in Colombia. Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.004
77.
PereiraR. H. M., SchwanenT., & BanisterD. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
78.
Pfau-EffingerB. (2017). Development of culture, welfare states and women’s employment in Europe. Routledge.
79.
RangarajanC., KaulP. I., & Seema (2011). Where is the missing labour force?Economic & Political Weekly, 46(39).
80.
SariF. (2015). Public transit and labor market outcomes: Analysis of the connections in the French agglomeration of Bordeaux. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.015
81.
SarkarS., SahooS., & KlasenS. (2019). Employment transitions of women in India: A panel analysis. World Development, 115, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.003
82.
ScheinerJ. (2014). Gendered key events in the life course: Effects on changes in travel mode choice over time. Journal of Transport Geography, 37, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.007
83.
SchererM., & DziekanK. (2012). Bus or rail: An approach to explain the psychological rail factor. Journal of Public Transportation, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.15.1.5
84.
SchumannJ. W. (1997). Rail in multimodal transit systems: Concept for improving urban mobility by increasing choices for travel and lifestyle. Transportation Research Record, 1571(1), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.3141/1571-26
85.
SenA. (1992). Missing women. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 304(6827), 587–588.
86.
ShahS., ViswanathK., VyasS., & GadepalliS. (2017). Women and Transport in Indian Cities. ITDP and Safetipin, New Delhi Photo Credits Cover: Luc Nadal, ITDP Page 1: Santhosh Loganaathan, ITDP India, 10–11.
87.
SmithJ. P., & WardM. P. (1985). Time-series growth in the female labor force. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1, Part 2), S59–S90. https://doi.org/10.1086/298076
88.
StopherP. R. (2004). Reducing road congestion: A reality check. Transport Policy, 11(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.09.002
89.
StutzerA., & FreyB. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00542.x
90.
The Financial Express (2019, July11). Haryana orbital rail corridor to connect Palwal to Sonipat, run along Western Peripheral Expressway; details. https://www.financialexpress.com/infrastructure/railways/haryana-orbital-rail-corridor-to-connect-palwal-to-sonipat-run-along-western-peripheral-expressway-details/1640433/
91.
ThynellM. (2016). The quest for gender-sensitive and inclusive transport policies in growing Asian cities. Social Inclusion, 4(3), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i3.479
92.
TurnerJ., & FouracreP. (1995). Women and transport in developing countries. Transport Reviews, 15(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441649508716902
93.
TyndallJ. (2017). Waiting for the R train: Public transportation and employment. Urban Studies, 54(2), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015594079
94.
TzannatosZ. (1999). Women and labor market changes in the global economy: Growth helps, inequalities hurt and public policy matters. World Development, 27(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00156-9
VerickS. (2018). Female labor force participation and development. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.87
97.
ViswanathK., & MehrotraS. T. (2007). “Shall we go out?” Women’s safety in public spaces in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(17), 1542–1548.
98.
WheatleyD. (2013). Location, vocation, location? Spatial entrapment among women in dual career households. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(6), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12005
99.
WoetzelJ. (2015). The power of parity: How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth (Working Papers id. 7570). eSocialSciences. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id7570.html
100.
Women and Men in India-2016 (n.d.). Ministry of statistics and program implementation. Government of India. http://mospi.nic.in/publication/women-and-men-india-2016
101.
YuH., JiaoJ., HoustonE., & PengZ.-R. (2018). Evaluating the relationship between rail transit and industrial agglomeration: An observation from the Dallas-fort worth region, TX. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.008
