Investments in organizational training and its evaluation is important in recent times. One of the most popular models of training evaluation is the four-level model developed by Kirkpatrick. It includes participant reactions (Level I), extent of learning (Level II), the extent of transfer of training through appropriate behaviour (Level III) and improvement in organization performance (Level IV). Despite its overwhelming use in the industry, organizations have frequently gathered data on Level I of this model only. While extant literature researched on factors affecting participant reactions; group composition influences merited scant attention. To address this gap, the current study conducted at an Indian power transmission organization, focused on the influence of group composition on participant reactions to training of a programme titled ‘Empowering Self for Better Performance’. Reaction data were collected from all the 120 participants who attended the programme. Data analyses pointed out to significant resultant differences in perception on two major dimensions of reaction—programme content and programme duration among participants with differences in age, organizational tenure, job position and educational qualifications. Our results not only provide empirical credence to the importance of group composition in influencing participant reactions but also bear implications for training design of millennials and soft skills programmes in heterogenous groups.
AllenM., WittP. L., & WheelessL. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21–31.
2.
AlligerG. M., & JanakE. A. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology, 42(2), 331–342.
3.
AlligerG. M., TannenbaumS. I., BennettW.Jr., TraverH., & ShotlandA. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341–358.
4.
ArthurW.Jr., BennettW.Jr., EdensP. S., & BellS. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234–245.
5.
BertolinoM., TruxilloD. M., & FraccaroliF. (2011). Age as moderator of the relationship of proactive personality with training motivation, perceived career development from training, and training behavioral intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 248–263.
6.
BezrukovaK., JehnK. A., & SpellC. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 207–227.
7.
ClementR. W. (1982). Testing the hierarchy theory of training evaluation: An expanded role for trainee reactions. Public Personnel Management, 11(2), 176–184.
8.
DiamantidisA. D., & ChatzoglouP. D. (2014). Employee post-training behaviour and performance: Evaluating the results of the training process. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(3), 149–170.
9.
EntwistleN. J., & EntwistleA. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22(3), 205–227.
10.
FeiertagJ., & BergeZ. L. (2008). Training generation N: How educators should approach the net generation. Education + Training, 50(6), 457–464.
11.
FerreiraV. F. M., PaivaG. P., PrandoN., GraçaC. R., & KouyoumdjianJ. A. (2016). Time perception and age. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 74(4), 299–302.
12.
GallowayD. L. (2005). Evaluating distance delivery and e-learning is kirkpatrick’s model relevant?Performance Improvement, 44(4), 21–27.
13.
GhoshP., JoshiJ. P., SatyawadiR., MukherjeeU., & RanjanR. (2011). Evaluating effectiveness of a training programme with trainee reaction. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(4), 247–255.
14.
GhoshP., SatyawadiR., JoshiJ. P., RanjanR., & SinghP. (2012). Towards more effective training programmes: A study of trainer attributes. Industrial and Commercial Training, 44(4), 194–202.
15.
GiangrecoA., SebastianoA., & PecceiR. (2009). Trainees’ reactions to training: An analysis of the factors affecting overall satisfaction with training. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 96–111.
16.
GrugulisI., & VincentS. (2009). Whose skill is it anyway? ‘soft’ skills and polarization. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 597–615.
17.
GursoyD., MaierT. A., & ChiC. G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 448–458.
18.
HookK., & BunceD. (2001). Immediate learning in organisational computer training as a function of training intervention affective reaction, and session impact measures. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 436–454.
19.
JainR. K., & AgrawalR. (2005). Indian and international perspectives on employee training practices: A trend. South Asian Journal of Management, 12(1), 79–100.
20.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1959a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 1-reactions. Journal of the ASTD, 13(11), 3–9.
21.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1959b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 2-learning. Journal of the ASTD, 13(12), 21–26.
22.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1960a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 3-behavior. Journal of the ASTD, 14(1), 13–18.
23.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1960b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Part 4-results. Journal of the ASTD, 14(2), 28–32.
24.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1996). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
25.
KozlowskiS. W. J., GullyS. M., BrownK. G., SalasE., SmithE. M., & NasonE. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 1–31.
26.
KraigerK., FordJ., & SalasE. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328.
27.
LakerD. R., & PowellJ. L. (2011). The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(1), 111–122.
28.
LechnerM. (2000). An evaluation of public-sector-sponsored continuous vocational training programs in East Germany. Journal of Human Resources, 35(2), 347–375.
29.
LeeS. H., & PershingJ. A. (2002). Dimensions and design criteria for developing training reaction evaluations. Human Resource Development International, 5(2), 175–197.
30.
LimD. H., & MorrisM. L. (2006). Influence of trainee characteristics, instructional satisfaction, and organizational climate on perceived learning and training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(1), 85–115.
31.
MorganR. B., & CasperW. J. (2000). Examining the factor structure of participant reactions to training: A multidimensional approach. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 301–317.
32.
OblingerD. (2003). Boomers, Gen Xers & millennials: Understanding the new students. Educause. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0342.pdf
33.
OlsenJ. H. (1998). The evaluation and enhancement of training transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 2(1), 61–75.
34.
PartridgeH., & HallamG. (2006). Educating the millennial generation for evidence based information practice. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 400–419.
35.
PayneS. C., YoungcourtS. S., & BeaubienJ. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128.
36.
PendryL. F., DriscollD. M., & FieldS. C. (2007). Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 27–50.
37.
PlantR. A., & RyanR. J. (1994). Who is evaluating training?Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(5), 27–30.
38.
PontT. (1996). Developing effective training skills. A practical guide to designing and delivering group training (2nd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe.
39.
PunjG., & StewartD. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134–148.
40.
RobersonL., KulikC. T., & PepperM. B. (2001). Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainees experience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(8), 871–885.
41.
RuddM., VohsK. D., & AakerJ. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136.
42.
Russ-EftD., & PreskillH. (2001). Evaluation in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
43.
SandeenC. (2008). Boomers, Xers, and Millennials: Who are they and what do they really want from continuing higher education?Continuing Higher Education Review, 72, 11–31.
44.
SharmaH. (2014). Importance and performance of managerial training in Indian companies—An empirical study. Journal of Management Development, 33(2), 75–89.
45.
ShawS., & FairhurstD. (2008). Engaging a new generation of graduates. Education + Training, 50(5), 366–378.
46.
SitzmannT., BrownK. G., CasperW. J., ElyK., & ZimmermanR. D. (2008). A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 280–295.
47.
SugrueB., & RiveraR. J. (2005). State of the industry: ASTD’s annual review of trends in workplace learning and performance. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Training and Development.
48.
TanJ. A., HallR. J., & BoyceC. (2003). The role of employee reactions in predicting training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 397–411.
49.
TannenbaumS. I., MathieuJ. E., SalasE., & Cannon-BowersJ. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 759–769.
50.
Van BurenM. E., & ErskineW. (2002). The 2002 ASTD state of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Training and Development.
51.
VeladaR., & CaetanoA. (2007). Training transfer: The mediating role of perception of learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(4), 283–296.
52.
YadapadithayaP. S., & StewartJ. (2003). Corporate training and development policies and practices: A cross-national study of India and Britain. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(2), 108–123.
