Globalisation has created a cutthroat competition among the major players. Organisations are indulged in tempting the customers. They are offering tremendous benefit schemes in order to win a considerable level of customer satisfaction. But this customer satisfaction cannot be compared with the employee satisfaction as the employees play the key role and without whose effort the organisation cannot develop and survive in the market.
A study has been conducted on the teachers of technical institutions to evaluate the factors which influence job satisfaction. The paper attempts at finding out the relationship among the various factors as well as significant differences among them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbasiS.HollmanK. (2000), “Turnover: The Real Bottom-line,. Public Personnel Management29(3), pp. 333–342.
2.
BluedornA. C. (1982), “A unified model of turnover from organizations”, Human Relations35(2): pp. 135–153.
3.
ChernissC. (1995), “Beyond Burnout: Helping Teachers, Nurses, Therapists and Lawyers Recover from Stress and Disillusionment”, Routledge, New York.
4.
JohnCotton L.JeffreyTuttle M. (1986). “Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analysis and Review with implications for Research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. II, No.1, pp. 55–70.
5.
DinhamS.ScottC. (1998b), “A three domain model of teacher and school executive satisfaction”, Journal of Educational AdministrationVol. 36, pp. 362–378.
6.
DinhamS.ScottC. (1999), “The relationship between context, type of school and position held in school and occupational satisfaction, and mental stress”, a paper presented to the Australian College of Education/Australian Council for Educational Administration, National Conference, Darwin, Australia.
7.
DinhamS.ScottC. (2000a), “Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction”, Journal of Educational AdministrationVol. 38, pp. 379–396.
8.
DinhamS.ScottC. (2000b), “Teachers' work and the growing influence of societal expectations and pressures”, a paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, April.
9.
DinhamS.ScottC. (2002), “The international Teacher 2000 Project: An international study of teacher and school executive satisfaction, motivation and health in Australia, England, USA, Malta and New Zealand”, a paper presented to the Challenging Futures Conference, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
10.
Van LinnDyneJonPierce L., (2004), “Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organisational behaviour25, pp. 439–459.
11.
EskildsenJ.K.DahlgaardJ.J. (2000), “Prioritising opportunities for improvement”, paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on “Building people and organisational excellence”, Åarhus, pp. 530–7.
12.
FarberB. A. (1991), Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
13.
FredricFrank D.CraigTaylor R. (2003). “Talent Management Trends That Will Shape the Future”, Human Resource Planning, Vol. 27, No.1.
14.
HammerRay. (2000), “Winning program brings smiles to hotel's employees.”Houston Business Journal.43A.
15.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
HubermanM. (1993), “The Lives of Teachers”, Cassell, London.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM.-D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 1297–1343, Chicago: Rand McNally.
MobleyW. H. (1977), “Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover,. Joumnal of Applied Psychology62, pp. 237–240.
21.
MowdayR. T.PorterL. W.SteersR. M. (1982). Employee organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
22.
NaylorC. (2001), “Teacher workload and stress: An international perspective on human costs and systemic failure”, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 464 028.
23.
UdaiPareek (2004), “Effective Organization: Beyond Management to Institution Building”, Oxford University Press.
24.
UdaiPareek (2002), “Training Instruments in HRD & OD”, TMH, New Delhi, ISBN: 0-07-048324-8, ed. 2nd, pp. 257–815.
25.
ScottC.DinhamS. (2001), “In search of the third domain: Teacher satisfaction in Malta”, a paper presented to the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.
26.
ScottC.StoneB.DinhamS. (2001), ‘I love teaching but.…' International patterns of discontent”, Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 9, No 28, retrieved on-line http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n28.html.
27.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, pp. 224–253.
28.
TromanG.WoodsP. (2000), “Careers under stress: Teacher adaptations at a time of intensive reform”, Journal of Educational ChangeVol. 1, pp. 253–275.
29.
Tshannen-MoranM.Woolfolk-HoyA.HoyW. (1998), “Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure”, Review of Educational ResearchVol. 68, pp. 202–248.
30.
Van den BergR. (2002), “Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice”, Review of Educational ResearchVol. 72, pp. 577–625.
31.
VandenbergheR.HubermanA. M. (1999), “Understanding and Preventing Teacher Burnout”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
32.
ChristianWallinIvanStipic, (2007), “The Subtleties of Retention: A Human Resource Management Perspective”, Lund University.
33.
WoodsP.JeffreyB.TromanG.BoyleM. (1997), “Restructuring Schools; Reconstructing Teachers: Responding to Change in the Primary School”, Open University Press, Buckingham.
