The present study examines perceptions of the quality of work life among a sample of Indian employees. Data are obtained from managerial executives through structured questionnaires and are used to illustrate their perceptions concerning QWL. Results from the factor analysis suggest four dimensions of QWL labeled, favorable work environment, personal growth and autonomy nature of job, and stimulating opportunities and co-workers. The results provide a useful benchmark measure of QWL in India. Overall, the findings support conceptualizations of factors involved in perceived QWL derived from different parts of the world and the implications of the research findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenBurton J.KinnevySusan C.DickerMelissa E. (2007). ‘The Quality of Work Life of Child Protective Investigators: A Comparison of Two Work Environments’ in Child and Youth Services Review Vol.29, pp. 474–489.
2.
CronbachL. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297–334.
3.
GallieDuncan (2003). ‘The Quality of Working Life: Is Scandinavia Different?’Oxford Journal, Vol. 19. pp. 61–79.
4.
David EfratyM. Joseph Sirgy (2004). ‘The Effects of QWL on Employee Behavioral Responses’ by Springer, Netherlands, Vol. 22, pp. 31–47.
5.
DavisL. (1983). Learning from the Design of New Organizations. In KolodnyH.van BeinumH. (Eds.), The Quality of Working Life and the 1980s (pp. 65–86). New York; Praeger.
6.
DavisL.ChernsA. (Eds.). (1975). The Quality of Working Life. New YorkFree Press.
KalraS.GhoshS. (1984). Quality of Work Life; A Study of Associated Factors. The Indian Journal of Social Work, pp. 45–54.
9.
KirkmanF. (1981). Who Cares about Job Design?International Journal of Operations and Production Management2, pp. 3–13.
10.
KingN. (1992). Improving the Quality of Working Life through Communication. Asia Pacific Journal of Quality Management, 1, pp. 51–58.
11.
LevineM. (1983). Self-developed QWL Measures. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 4, pp. 35–46.
12.
MacarovD. (1981). Humanizing the Workplace as Squaring the Circle. International Journal of Manpower, 2, pp. 6–14.
13.
MillsT. (1978). What's in a name? Detroit: GeneralMotors Corporation.
14.
Musharraf HossainMd.Tariqual-IslamMd. (1999). ‘QWL and Job Satisfaction of Nurses in Government Hospitals in Bangladesh’, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 34. No. 3.
15.
LeesMartinKearnsSandra (2005) ‘Improving Work Life Quality: A Diagnostic Approach Model’, A report by Long Woods Publishing.
16.
MaccobyMichael (1984). ‘The Quality of Work Life in Bell System’, Monthly Labor ReviewVol. 10. No. 3.
17.
Che RoseRaduanLooseeBehJagak UliIdrisKhairuddin (2006), University of Malaysia. Quality of Work Life: Implications on Career Dimensions’, Journal of Social Science Research, pp. 61–67.
18.
JoshiRama J. (2007), Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources, New Delhi. ‘QWL of Women Workers: Role of Trade Unions’, Indian Journal of Industrial RelationsVol. 42, pp. 3–5.
19.
NarongritSaipinThongsriSupit (2001), a Research Report published by Thaitoyo Denso Company Limited.
20.
WaltonR. (1974). QWL indicators-Prospects and Problems. In PortigalA. (Ed.). Measuring the Quality of Working Life. (pp. 57–70). Ottawa: Department of Labour.
