Numerous studies of supervisor-subordinate relationships (LMX) have confirmed the differential impact of the quality of relationship on subordinate ratings. In other words, subordinates that have high quality relationships with their supervisors receive higher rewards (e.g., ratings, guidance, support, etc.). However, most of these studies have assumed that high quality LMX relationships automatically lead to high performance ratings, without examining the impact of performance levels. In this two-nation quasi-experimental study, we test for the moderation and mediation effects of LMX quality. Further, given the recent emphasis on, and call for, cross-cultural studies, we extend the study of LMX to a cross-cultural context by comparing the workings of LMX in the U.S. and India. Our results show that the quality of relationship had a significant impact on performance ratings in India — while this did not hold true in the U.S. sample.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amba-RaoS.PetrickJ.GuptaJ.Von Der EmbseT. (2000). Comparative Performance Appraisal Practices and Management Values among Foreign and Domestic Firms in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), pp.60–89.
2.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A. (1996). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173–1182.
3.
BrewsterC.TregaskisO.HegewischA.MayneL. (1996). Comparative Research in Human Resource Management: A Review and an Example. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(3): pp.585–604.
4.
BudhwarP. (2001). Doing Business in India. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(4): pp.549–568.
5.
BudhwarP.DebrahY. (2001) Rethinking Comparative and Cross National Human Resource Management Research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.12(3): pp.497–515.
6.
BudhwarP.DebrahY. (2004). Introduction: HRM in Developing Countries. In BudhwarP.DebrahY. (Eds.) HRM in Developing Countries. London: Routledge, pp.1–15.
7.
DansereauF.Jr.GraenG.HagaW.J. (1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations — A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.
8.
DattR.SundharamK.P.H. (1999). Indian Economy.New Delhi: S. Chand.
9.
DuarteN.T.GoodsonJ.R.KlichN.R. (1993). How Do I Like Thee? Let Me Appraise the Ways. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 14, pp.239–249.
10.
GraenG.CashmanJ. (1975). A Role-making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A developmental Approach. In HuntJ.G.LarsonL.L. (Eds.), “Leadership Frontiers, 143–165. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
11.
GraenG. B.SchiemannW. (1978). Leader-member Agreement: A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, pp.206–212.
12.
HofstedeG. (1999). Cultural Constraints in Management Theories, Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): pp.81–94.
13.
JavidanM.HouseR. (2001). Cultural Acumen for the Global Manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organisational Dynamics, 29(4), pp.289–305.
14.
KapurD.RamamurtiR. (2001). India's Emerging Competitive Advantage in Services. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2): pp.20–33.
15.
LidenR. C.GraenG. B. (1980). Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp.451–465.
16.
NapierN. K.VuV. T. (1998). International Human Resource Management in Developing and Transitional Economy Countries: A Breed Apart?Human Resource Management Review8(1): pp.39–77.
17.
SahayS.WalshamG. (1997). Social Structure and Managerial Agency in India. Organisation Studies, 18: pp.415–444.
18.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. In LeinhardtS (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, (pp.290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
19.
SparrowP.R.BudhwarP.S. (1997). Competition and Change: Mapping the Indian HRM Recipe Against World-wide Patterns. Journal of World Business, 32(3), pp.224–242.
20.
TsuiA.S.O'ReillyC.A.III (1989). Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Supervisor-Subordinate Dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp.402–423.
21.
VarmaA.DeNisiA. S.PetersL. H. (1996). Interpersonal Affect and Performance Appraisal: A Field Study. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), pp.341–360.
22.
VechhioR.P. (1998). Leader-Member Exchange, Objective Performance, Employment Duration, and Supervisor Ratings: Testing for Moderation and Mediation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(3), pp.327–341.
23.
Venkata RatnamC. S.ChandraV. (1996). Sources of Diversity and the Challenge before Human Resource Management in India. International Journal of Manpower, 17(6–7), pp.76–108.
