AmabileT. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press.
2.
BakerG. P.JensenM.C.MurphyK. J. (1988). Compensation and incentives: practice vs. theory. Journal of Finance, 43, pp.593–616.
3.
BesserT. L. (1995). Reward and organizational goal achievement: A case study of Toyota Motor manufacturing in Kentucky. Journal of Management Studies, 32, pp.383–400.
4.
CondryI. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, pp.459–477.
5.
CowherdC. M.LevineD. I. (1992). Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp.302–321.
6.
DeciE. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, pp. 105–115.
7.
FerraroF.PfefferJ.SuttonR. L. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30. pp.8–24.
8.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, pp.75–91.
9.
GhoshalS.MoranP. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 13–47.
10.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp.250–279.
11.
KerrS. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769–783.
12.
KohnA., (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 1–7.
13.
KrishnanV.R.2003. Do business schools change students' values along desirable lines? A longitudinal study, In NataleS.M.LibertellaA. F. (eds) Business education and training: A value-laden process.Volume 8 (Immortal Longings), pp. 26–39. University Press of America, Lanham.
14.
LibermanV.SamuelsS.RossL. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputation vs. situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, pp. 1175–1185.
15.
MeyerH. H. (1975). The Pay-for-Performance Dilemma. Organizational Dynamics, 3, pp.39–50.
16.
MillerD. T.RatnerR. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, pp.53–62.
17.
OpsahlK. L.DunnetteM. D. (1966). The role of financial compensation in industrial motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 66, pp.94–118.
18.
PfefferJ. (1998). Six dangerous myths about pay. Harvard Business Review, 76, pp. 109–119.
19.
PittmanT. S.EmeryJ.BoggianoA. K. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced changes in preference for complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp.789–797.
20.
ShamirB. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies.12, 405–424.
21.
SimonH.A. (1945). Administrative Behavior, New York: The Macmillan Company.
22.
SinghN.KrishnanV. R. (2005). Towards understanding transformational leadership in India: A grounded theory approach. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 9, pp.5–17.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and Motivation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
25.
WilliamsonO. E. (1964). The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm.Prentice-Hall Inc.
26.
WilliamsonO. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization.New York: Free Press.