There has been considerable research work on early South India, particularly early Tamilakam, using archaeological, epigraphical and literary sources. Earlier, studies on early Tamilakam was almost exclusively based on the early Tamil texts, called as heroic or bardic poetry. However, a wealth of material has been generated by archaeological exploration, that have unearthed a mass of material from paleolithic, mesolthic, neolithic and the iron age megalthic, bordering on the early historic ages. A number of Tamil Brahmi label inscriptions have also been discovered. However, the largst number of archeaological finds have been megalthic burial sites and habitation sites are only in the process of being discovered. There are also difficulties in corroborating archaelogical and epigraphic material with the enormous corpus of early Tamil texts. As a result, there is a tendency to dismiss the early Tamil texts as not conducive to historical analysis. The present article argues that we will still be able to use the material of the early Tamil texts using the tools provided by human geography, and suggests a methodology for making use of the literary material for further explorations in the early history of Tamilakam.
Agrawal, D.P. (1982), The Archeology of India, London .
2.
Allchin, B. and R. Allchin (1983), The Rise of Civilisation in India and Pakistan, New Delhi .
3.
Begley, Vimala and R.D. De Puma , ed. (1992), Rome and India: The Ancient Sea Trade, Madison .
4.
Begley, Vimala , et al. (1996), The Ancient Port of Arikamedu, New Excavations and Researches 1989–92, Pondicherry .
5.
Binford, L.R. (1962), ‘ Archeology as Anthropology ’, American Antiquity, Vol. 28: 2, pp. 217–25 .
6.
Champakalakshmi, R. (1975), ‘ Archeology and Tamil Literary Tradition ’, Puratatva, VIII, pp. 110–22 .
7.
Champakalakshmi, R. (1996), Trade, Ideology and Urbanisation: South India 300 BC–AD 1300, pp. 117–40.
8.
Darsana, S.B. (1998), ‘Protohistorical Investigations in the Upper Palar Basin (Tamil Nadu), Ph.D. dissertation, University of Poona .
9.
Gurukkal, R. (1989), ‘ Forms of Production and Forces of Change in Ancient Tamil Society ’, Studies in History, Vol. 5: 2, pp. 159–75 .
10.
Gurukkal, R. (1990), 'social Formation and Political Processes in Early Tamilakam’, Seminar on State in Precolonial India, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi .
11.
Gurukkal, R. (1995), ‘The Beginning of the Historic Period: The Tamil South’, in Romila Thapar (ed.), Recent Perspectives of Early Indian History, Bombay , pp. 246–70.
12.
Gurukkal, R. (1996), ‘Towards a New Discourse: Discursive Processes in Early South India’, in R. Champakalakshmi and S. Gopal , eds, Tradition, Dissent and Ideology: Essays in Honour of Romila Thapar, New Delhi .
13.
Gurukkal, R. (1998), ‘Historicising Culture’, Presidential Address, South Indian History Congress, XIII Session, Kalady .
14.
Gurukkal, Rajan and Varier, Raghava , ed. (1999), Cultural History of Kerala, Vol. I, Thiruvananthapuram , pp. 165–76.
15.
Gururaja Rao, B.K. (1972), Megalithic Culture in South India, Prasaranga, University of Mysore .
16.
Harvey, David (2001), Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, pp. 222–23 .
17.
Hodder, I. (2003), The Archeological Process, pp. 84–86 .
18.
Hodder, I. (1987), ‘Contribution of the Long Term’, in Ian Hodder , ed., Archaeology as Long Term History, Cambridge University Press , p. 8.
19.
Jay Gould, Stephen (1997), ‘ A Tale of Two Worksites ’, Natural History, Vol. 106: 5, pp. 18–22 .
20.
Kailasapathy, K. (1968), Tamil Heroic Poetry, Chapter V, Oxford .
21.
Krishnamurty, R.K. (1997). Sangam Age Tamil Coins, Madras .
22.
Leshnik, L.S. (1974), South Indian Megalithic Burials: The Pandukal Complex, Wiesbaden .
23.
Lewis and Sally Binford , ed. (1968), New Perspectives in Archeology, Chicago .
24.
Mahadevan, I. (1968), ‘Corpus of Brahmi Inscriptions’, in R. Nagaswamy , ed., Seminar on Inscrip-tions, Madras .
25.
Mahadevan, I. (2003), Early Tamil Epigraphy: From Earliest Times to the Sixth Century AD, Cre-A Chennai and the Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University .
26.
Majeed, Abdul , et al. (1992), Alagankulam, A Preliminary Report, Department of Archeology, Madras .
27.
Mohanty, R.K. and V. Selvakumar (2002), The Archaeology of the Megaliths In India: 1947–1997, in Settar and Korisettar , eds, Archeology in Retrospect Vol. I Pre-history and Archeology of South Asia, Delhi , pp. 313–481.
28.
Moorti, U.S. (1994), Megalithic Cultures, Delhi .
29.
Nagaswamy, R. (1970), ‘ Korkai Excavations ’, Damilica, December, pp. 50–52 .
30.
Nagaswamy, R. (1973), Kaveripattanam, A Guide, Department of Archeology, Madras .
31.
Nagaswamy, R. (1974), ‘ Karuvur Vanci: The Capital of the Sangam Cheras ’, Journal of Kerala Studies, Vol. I, pt. IV.
32.
Nagaswamy, R. (1991), ‘Alagankulam: An Indo-Roman Trading Port in C. Margabandhu , K.S. Ramachandran , A.P. Sagar and D.K. Sinha , eds, Indian Archeological Heritage (K.V. Soundara Rajan felicitation Volume), Delhi .
33.
Nagaswamy, R. and A. Abdul Majeed (1970), Vasavasamudram (Report on the Excavations Con-ducted During the year 1970), Department of Archeology, Madras .
34.
Narasimhaiah, B. (1980), Neolithic and Megalithic Cultures in Tamil Nadu, New Delhi .
35.
Narayanan, M.G.S. (1981), ‘ Cattle Raids in the Sangam Age ’, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress.
36.
Narasimhaiah, B. (1991), ‘Peasants and Warriors in the Sangam Age’, in Foundations of South Indian History and Culture, Kanishka , pp. 106–31.
37.
Nilakantha Sastri, K.A. (2002), A History of South India, Nineteenth Impression.
38.
O’Brien, M.J. and R. Lee Lyman (2000), Applying Evolutionary Archeology, New York .
39.
Pillai,Vaiyapuri (1956), History of Tamil Language and Literature, Madras .
40.
Polany, K. (1957), ‘The Economy as an Instituted Process’, in K. Polanyi , C. Arensberg and H. Pearson eds, Trade and Market in Early Empires, Glenco , pp. 247–56.
41.
Raghava Varier, M.R. (1996), ‘Neital Tinai: A Socio-economic Analysis’, an unpublished paper, University of Calicut.
42.
Rajan, K. (1989–90), ‘ Iron and Gem Stone Industries as Revealed from Kodumanal Excavations ’, Puratattva, No. 20, pp. 111–12 .
43.
Rajan, K. (1991), 'stratigraphical Position of Russetted Coated Painted ware’, in C. Margabandhu , K.S. Ramachandran , A.P. Sagar and D.K. Sinha , eds, Indian Archeological Heritage, K.V. Soundararajan Feschcrift, Delhi .
44.
Rajan, K. (2008), ' situating the Beginning of Early Historic Times in Tamil Nadu: Some Issues and Reflections ’, Presidential Address, Archeology Session, Indian history Congress, Delhi, 2007, Social Scientist, Vol. 36: 1–2, p. 43 .
45.
Ramachandra Dikshitar, V.R. (1936), Studies in Tamil Literature and History, Madras .
46.
Ramaswamy, Sumathi (2007), Fabulous Geographies and Marvelous Histories, Delhi .
47.
Ray, H.P. and J.P. DeSelles , ed. (2003), The Archeology of Sea faring in the Indian Ocean.
48.
Rao, G. (1972) Megalithic Culture in South India, Prasaranga, Mysore .
49.
Ricoer, Paul (1981), Hermeneutics and Human Sciences, in J. Thompson , ed., (trans.) J. Thompson , Cambridge , p. 131.
50.
Sankunni, Kottarathil (1982), Aitihyamala, Third Impression, pp. 749–58.
51.
Selvakumar, V. (2005), ‘Cognitive Aspects of the Iron Age—Early Historic (“Megalithic”) Cultures of South India’, paper presented at the national seminar on Indian megaliths—Archeological and Ethnographic Sources, organized by Indira Gandhi Rashtra Manava Sangrahalaya, 28–30 November.
52.
Selvakumar, V. , et al. (2005), ‘ Trial Excavations at Pattanam, A Preliminary Report ’, Journal of the Center of Heritage Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 57–66 .
53.
Seneviratne, S. (1990), ‘Pre-State Societies and State Societies, Transformations in the Political Ecology of South India with Special Reference to Tamil Nadu’, Seminar on State in Pre-Colonial South India, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi .
54.
Seneviratne, S. ( 1993 ), ‘ From Kudi to Nadu: A Suggested Framework for the Study of Pre-State Political Formations in Early Iron Age South India ’, Sri Lanka Journal of Humanities, Vol. 19: 1–2, pp. 57–77 .
55.
Senthiappan M. and M.M. Nair (1980), ‘Geomorphology of Parts of Kannur District, Kerala’, Geo-logical Survey of India papers, Centre for Earth Science Studies, Trivandrum .
56.
Settar, S. and Ravi KoriSettar (2002), Indian Archeology in Retrospect Vol. I Pre-history and Archeology of South Asia, Delhi , pp. 313–51.
57.
Shajan, K.P. , P.J. Cheriyan and V. Selvakumar (2006), ‘ Pattanam Musiris thanneyo? ’, Adharam, Vol. 1, pp. 50–59 .
58.
Shanks, M. and C. Tilley (1987), Reconstructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Cambridge , pp. 130–34.
59.
Sidebotham, Steven E. (2006). ‘ Contacts Between Kerala Coast of India and Early Roman ports on the Red Sea Coast of Egypt, Kottayam ’, Adharam, Vol. I, pp. 60–67 .
60.
Singh, H.N. (1982), History and Archeology of Black and Red Ware (Chalcolithic) People, Delhi .
61.
Sivaraja Pillai, K.N. (1932), The Chronology of Early Tamils, Madras .
62.
Sivathamby, K. (1974), ‘ Early South Indian Society and Economy: The Tinai Concept ’, Social Scientist, Vol. 3: 5 .
63.
Sivaraja Pillai, K.N. (1998), ‘Cankam Literature and Archeology’, in Studies in Ancient Tamil Society: Economy, Society and the State Formation, Chennai , pp. 92–114.
64.
Sivaraja Pillai, K.N. (1974), ‘ An Analysis of the Anthropological Significance of the Economic Activities and Conduct Codes Ascribed to Mullai Tinai ’, Studies in Ancient Tamil Society, pp. 115–27 .
65.
Soundara Rajan, K.V. (1994), Kaveripattanam Excavations 1963–73, Archeological Survey of India .
66.
Srinivasa Iyengar, P.T. (1929), History of the Tamils, Madras .
67.
Srinivasan, K.R. (1946), ‘ The Megalithic Burials and Urnfields of South India in the Light of Tamil Literature and Tradition ’, Ancient India, No. 2, pp. 9–16 .
68.
Subbarayalu, Y. (2005), ‘Literature and Social History (with reference to palai tinai )’, presented in the ICHR Seminar on Literature and History, Mangalore University, Mangalore .
69.
Subramanian, N. (1966), Sangam Polity, Bombay .
70.
Subramanian, N. (1997), Tamil Social History, Vol. I, Chennai, Institute of Asian Studies .
71.
Sundara, A. (1975), Early Chamber Tombs of South India, Delhi .
72.
Suresh, S. (2004), Symbols of Trade, Roman and Pseudo-Roman Objects Found in South India, Delhi , p. 31.
73.
Thaninayagam, S. (1966), Landscape and Poetry, London .
74.
Vansina, Jan (1985), Oral Tradition as History, Nairobi , pp. 148–49.
75.
Wheeler, R.E.M. , A. Ghosh and Krishna Deva (1946), ‘ Arikamedu: An Indo-Roman Trading Station ’, Ancient India, No. 2, pp. 17–124 .
76.
Zvelebil, Kamil (1979), ‘ Tamil Poetry 200 Years Ago ’, Tamil Culture, Vol. X.
