Focussing on a ritually low caste but materially affluent potter’s family of eighteenth century Rajasthan that got embroiled in a petty family dispute, this article traces how a domestic squabble spilt out and played itself out in the public sphere. Dispelling the notion of harmonious joint families characterizing pre-colonial India, this article demonstrates the tensions and often antagonistic interests and agendas of different members in Kumhar Paima’s household and examines the negotiations attempted by competing interests with the dispute-processing fora. These help highlight the overlapping yet intersecting networks of discipline and control. The locally influential position of this kumhar family points towards considerable differentiation within castes and communities, and complicates ideas about the homogeneity of caste groups. More importantly, its dispute with the community of potters points towards instances of dilution in caste bonds, while its protection by the Jodhpur rulers suggests vertical bonds that often superseded horizontal kin and community affiliations. Through a close reading of this court case, this article argues that power and authority were culturally constructed, not merely in terms of royal gift-giving and material support to retainers as often argued, but also in terms of extending patronage that included intangible non-material support, especially intercession on behalf of a client in the process of judicial dispensation
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahmad, M.B. (1978), Judicial System of the Mughal Empire, New Edition, Karachi .
2.
Ahuja, Ravi . (2002), ‘ Labour Relations in an Early Colonial Context: Madras, 1750–1800 ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 36: 4, pp. 793–827 .
3.
Alam, Muzaffar (2004), The Languages of Political Islam in India 1200–1800, New Delhi .
4.
Ballhatchet, K. (1980), Race, Sex, and Class under the Raj, London .
5.
Bayly, C.A. (1973), ‘ Patrons and Politics in Northern India ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 7: 3, pp. 349–88 .
6.
Bayly, Chris (1996), Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870, Cambridge .
7.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1983), ‘Forms of Capital’, in J.C. Richards ed., Handbook of the Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York .
8.
Brake, Wayne te (1998), Shaping History: Ordinary People in European Politics, 1500–1700, Berkeley .
9.
Barani Ziauddin (1972), Fatwa-i-Jahandari, edited by Afsar Saleem Khan , Lahore ; transl. by Muhammad Habib and Afsar U.A. Khan , The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, Allahabad .
10.
Breman, Jan (1974), Patronage and Exploitation: Changing Agrarian Relations in South Gujarat, India .
11.
Chatterjee, Indrani (1999), Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India, New Delhi .
12.
Chaudhari, K.N. (1978), The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company, 1600–1760, Cambridge .
13.
Cohn, Bernard S. (1965), ‘ Anthropological Notes on Disputes and Law in India ’, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 67: 6, Part 2: The Ethnography of Law, pp. 82–122 .
14.
Commander, Simon (1983), ‘ The Jajmani System in North India: An Examination of its Logic and Status over Two Centuries ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. XVII: 2, pp. 283–311 .
15.
Detha, Vijay Dan and Bhagirath Kanorhiya (1977), Rajasthani Hindi Kahavat Kosh, Borunda .
16.
Dirks, Nicholas (1987), The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom, Cambridge .
17.
Doniger O’Flaherty, Wendy and J. Duncan M. Derrett eds, (1978), The Concept of Duty in South Asia, Delhi .
18.
Dumont, Louis (1980). Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and its Implications, 2nd edition, transl. from French by Mark Sainsbury , Chicago .
19.
Fakhr-i-Mudabbir (1927), Adab-ul Harb waal-Shuja, ed., by E. Denison Ross , London .
20.
Faẓl, Abul (1989), A’in-i-Akbari, translated by H.S. Jarrett and Jadunath Sarkar , Delhi .
21.
Feldhaus, Anne , ed. (1998), Images of Women in Maharashtrian Society, Albany .
22.
Fisch, J. (1983), Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of the Bengal Criminal Law, 1769–1817, Weisbaden .
23.
Fuller, C.J. (1989), ‘Misconceiving the Grain Heap: A Critique of the Concept of the Indian Jajmani System’, in J. Parry and M. Bloch eds, Money and the Morality of Exchange, Cambridge , pp. 33–63.
24.
al-Ghazali (1964). Nasihat-ul-Muluk (Counsel for Kings) ed., Jalal Homai , Tehran . English transl., F.R.C. Bagley , London, Oxford University Press , 1964.
25.
Gahlot, S.S. and Banshi Dhar (1989), Castes and Tribes of Rajasthan, Jodhpur .
Gordon, Steward (2003), Robes of Honour: Khilat in Pre-Colonial and Colonial India, Delhi .
28.
Guha, Sumit (1995), ‘ An Indian Penal Regime: Maharashtra in the Eighteenth Century ’, Past and Present, Vol. 147, pp. 101–26 .
29.
Guha, Sumit (1998), ‘Wrongs and Rights in the Maratha Country: Antiquity, Custom and Power in Eighteenth Century India’, in Michael Anderson and Sumit Guha eds, Changing Concepts of Rights and Justice in South Asia, Delhi , pp. 14–29.
30.
Guha, Sumit (2003), ‘The Politics of Identity and Enumeration in India c. 1600–1990’, Comparative Study of Society and History, pp. 148–67.
31.
Guha, Sumit (2004), ‘The Family Feudas Political Resource in Eighteenth Century India’, in Indrani Chatterjee ed., Unfamiliar Relations: Family and History in South Asia, New Delhi . pp. 73–94.
32.
Gune, V.T. (1953), The Judicial System of the Marathas, Poona .
33.
Hambly, Gavin (2003), ‘The Emperor’s Clothes: Robing and “Robes of Honour” in Mughal India’, in Steward Gordon ed., Robes of Honour: Khilat in Pre-Colonial and Colonial India, Delhi .
34.
Hardy, Peter (1978), ‘The Duty of the Sultan (in the Sultnanate Period) to further the Material Welfare of his Subjects’, in Wendy Doniger O’Flaherty and J. Duncan M. Derrett eds, The Concept of Duty in South Asia, Delhi , pp. 147–65.
35.
Hayden, Robert, M. (1983), ‘ Excommunication as Everyday Event and Ultimate Sanction: The Nature of Suspension from an Indian Caste ’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 42: 2, pp. 291–307 .
Kangle, R.P. (1992), The Kautilya Arthashastra, Delhi .
38.
Kotani, Hiroyuki (1999), ‘Kingship, State, and Local Society in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Century Deccan with special reference to Ritual Functions’, in Noboru Karashima ed., Kingship in Indian History: Japanese Studies in South Asia, No. 2, Delhi , pp. 237–71.
39.
Kracke, Jr. Edward, A. (1976), ‘ Early Visions of Justice for the Humble in East and West ’, Journal of the American Oriental Society’, Vol. 96: 4, pp. 492–98 .
40.
Kugle, S.A. (2001), ‘ Framed, Blamed, and Renamed: The Recasting of Islamic Jurisprudence in Colonial South Asia ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35: 2, pp. 257–313 .
41.
Kulke, Hermann (1976), ‘Kshatriyaization and Social Change: A Study in Orissa Setting’, in S.D. Pillai ed., Aspects of Changing India: Essays in Honour of G.S. Ghurye, Bombay , pp. 398–409.
42.
Lambton, A.K.S. (1962), ‘ Justice in the Medieval Persian Theory of Kingship ’, Studia Islamica, Vol. 17, 91–119 .
43.
Shumari Raj Marwar (1891), Jodhpur (at the RSAB).
44.
Minault, Gail (2003), ‘The Emperor’s Old Clothes: Robing and Sovereignty in Late Mughal and Early British India’, in Steward Gordon ed., Robes of Honour: Khilat in Pre-Colonial and Colonial India, Delhi .
45.
Moore, Erin, P. (1993), ‘ Gender, Power, and Legal Pluralism: Rajasthan, India ’, American Ethnologist, Vol. 20: 3, pp. 522–42 .
46.
Moreland W.H. and P. Geyl (trans. and ed.) (1925), Jahangir’s India: The Remonstrantie of Francisco Pelsaert: 1626, Cambridge .
47.
Nair, Janaki (1996), Women and Law in Colonial India: A Social History, Delhi .
48.
O’Malley, L.S.S. (1912), Bengal, Bihar, Orissa and Sikkim, Census of India, 1911, Vol. 5, Calcutta .
49.
Palriwala, Rajni (1996), ‘Negotiating Patriliny: Intra-household Consumption and Authority in North-west India’, in Palriwala and Carla Risseeuni eds, Shifting Circles of Support: Contextualising Kinship and Gender in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, New Delhi , pp. 190–220.
50.
Peabody, Norbert (2001), ‘ Cents, Sense, Census: Human Inventories in Late Precolonial and Early Colonial India ’, Comparative Study of Society and History, Vol. 43: 4, pp. 819–50 .
51.
Pelsaert, Francisco (1626), Remonstrantie, trans. W.H. Moreland and P. Geyl . Jahangir’s India. Cambridge .
52.
Pearson, M.N. (1982), ‘ Premodern Muslim Political Systems ’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 102: 1, pp. 47–58 .
53.
Perry, J.R. (1978), ‘ Justice for the Underprivileged: The Ombudsman Tradition of Iran ’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 37: 3, pp. 203–15 .
54.
Raheja, Gloria Goodwyn (1988), The Poison in the Gift: Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village, Chicago and London .
55.
Richards, J.F. (1984), ‘Norms of Comportment among Imperial Mughal Officers’, in Barbara Metcalf ed., Moral Conduct and Authority: The Place of Adab in South Asian Islam, Berkeley , pp. 255–89.
56.
Sahai, Nandita Prasad (2002), ‘ Collaboration and Conflict: Artisanal Jati Panchayats and Eighteenth Century Jodhpur State ’, Medieval History Journal, Vol. 5: 1, pp. 77–102 .
57.
Sahai, Nandita Prasad (2006), Politics of Patronage and Protest: State, Society and Artisans in Early Modern Rajasthan, Delhi .
58.
Sahai, Nandita Prasad (2007), ‘ The “Other” Culture: Craft Societies and Remarriage of Widows in Early Modern India ’, Journal of Women’s History, Vol. 19: 2, pp. 36–58 .
59.
Sangar, S.P. (1967), Crime and Punishment in Mughal India, Delhi .
60.
Sarkar, Tanika (2001), ‘A pre-History of Rights? The Age of Consent Debates in Colonial Bengal’, in Tanika Sarkar , ed., Hindu Wife, Hindu Nation, Delhi , pp. 226–49.
61.
Schacht, Joseph (1975), Origins of Muhammedan Jurisprudence, Oxford .
62.
Scott, James C. (1998), Seeing Like the State, New Haven .
63.
Singh, Dilbagh (2003), ‘ Regulating the Domestic: Notes on the Pre-Colonial State and Family ’, Studies in History, Vol. 19: 1, pp. 69–86 .
64.
Singha, Radhika (1996), ‘ Making the Domestic more Domestic: Criminal Law and the Head of the Household, 1772–1843 ’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 33: 3, pp. 309–43 .
65.
Singha, Radhika (1998a), ‘Civil Authority and Due Process: Colonial Criminal Justice in the Banaras Zamindari 1781–95’, in Michael R. Anderson and Sumit Guha eds, Changing Concepts of Rights and Justice in South Asia, Delhi , pp. 30–81.
66.
Singha, Radhika (1998b), A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India, Delhi .
67.
Singha, Radhika (2003). ‘ Colonial Law and Infrastructural Power: Reconstructing Community, Locating the Female Subject ’, 19: 1, 87–126 .
68.
Sinha, Surajit (1962), ‘ State Formation and Rajput Myth in Tribal Central India ’, Man in India, Vol. 42: 1, pp. 35–80 .
69.
Smail, Daniel Lord (2003), The Consumption of Justice: Emotions, Publicity, and Legal Culture in Marseille, 1264–1423, New York .
70.
Srinivas, M.N. (1952). Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India, Oxford .
71.
Tusi Nizamul-Mulk (1978), Siyasat Nama, trans. by Hubert Darke , The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, London .
72.
Wiser, William Henricks (1936), The Hindu Jajmani System: A Socio-Economic System Interrelating Members of a Hindu Village Community in Services, Lucknow .
73.
Wurgler, Andreas (2001), ‘ Voices from Among the “Silent Masses”: Humble Petitions and Social Conflicts in Early Modern Central Europe ’, International Review of Social History, Vol. 46, Supplement, pp. 11–34 .
