The article locates Delhi's urban environmental history firmly within the matrix of colonial urban politics, and analyses the relationship between sanitary discourse in Europe and the ‘politics of sanitation’ in India. It describes how colonial town planning, particularly in the context of Delhi, segregated sanitary and unsanitary spaces on a racial basis, the former being inhabited largely by the colonizers and the latter by the colonized. It discusses the technological and administrative measures undertaken by the colonial authorities to improve sanitary conditions on the one hand, and provide fresh water on the other. The article argues that New Delhi, and its water and waste disposal systems, was conceived of in a segregated way with respect to the old city, and civic services too benefited the new city at the expense of the old. It establishes a contrast between conceptions of the city in the West (as modern and progressive spaces) and in India (as unsanitary and therefore uncivilized spaces). Old Delhi, the author argues, was made ‘old’ through neglect and underdevelopment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Archives of India:
2.
Government of India, Foreign Department, Political Consultation.
3.
Government of India, Home Department Proceedings, 1873, 1874.
4.
Government of India, Home Department, Public Branch.
5.
Government of India, Home Department, Public Branch, B Proceedings.
6.
Government of India, Home Department, Public Branch Consultation 1859 (Public Works Department).
7.
Government of India, Home Department, Municipal Branch (B) Proceedings 1880.
8.
Government of India, Public Works Department, Proceedings of the President of the Council of India in Council, Fort William, Calcutta 1858.
9.
Records of the Commissioner's Office, Delhi Division (1869, 1872–76, 1894).
10.
Records of the Deputy Commissioner's Office, Delhi (1883–1915).
11.
Anderson, M.R. (1996), ‘The Conquest of Smoke: Legislation and Pollution in Colonial Calcutta’, in D. Arnold and R. Guha , eds, Nature, Culture, Imperialism. Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia, Delhi , pp. 293–335.
12.
‘ Canal of Ali Maidan Khan ’, in the Journal of the Asiatic Society (1833), Vol. 2, pp. 109–11 .
13.
‘ Cholera in the Delhi Division ’, in Selections from the Records of the Punjab Government (1875) , Vol. v, no. 8, pp. 30–36 , Lahore .
14.
Clark, W. (1875), Report on the Drainage of Madras, Madras .
15.
Conybeare, H. (1855), Report on the Sanitary State and Sanitary Requirements of Bombay (with appendices), in Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, no. xi, new series, Bombay .
16.
Delhi Gazette (1853), Wednesday, 2 March.
17.
Disraeli, Benjamin . (1926–27), The Bradenham Edition of the Novels and Tales of Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield, 12 vols, London .
18.
Dossal, M. (1991), Imperial Designs and Indian Realities. The Planning of Bombay City, 1845–1875, Delhi .
19.
Dowden, T.F. (1869), A Short Account of the Modes of Sewage Disposal in Some of the Chief Towns of England. Information on the Subject likely to be of Use in India, London .
20.
First Annual Administrative Report of the Sanitary Commission for Madras from April 1864 to April 1865 (1865), Madras .
21.
Förster, S. (1991), Handelsmonopol und Territorialherrschaft. Die Krise der East India Company 1784–1813, Bamberg .
22.
Gazetteer of the Delhi District, 1883–4 ( Punjab Gazetteers,Delhi, Punjab Government ).
23.
Gazetteer of the Delhi District (1913), Part B—Statistics 1912. District Gazetteers, vol. V.B.Delhi District, Lahore .
24.
Greathed, W.H. (1852), Report on the Drainage of the City of Delhi and the Means of Improving it, Agra .
25.
Grewal, R. (1994), ‘Urban Morphology Under Colonial Rule’, in I. Banga , ed., The City in Indian History. Urban Demography, Society and Politics, Delhi , pp. 173–90.
26.
Gupta, N. (1981), Delhi between Two Empires, 1803–1931. Society, Government and urban Growth, Delhi .
27.
Gupta, S. (1993), ‘ Theory and Practice of Town Planning in Calcutta, 1817–1912: An Appraisal ’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 30:1, pp. 29–55 .
28.
Kidambi, P. (2001), ‘ Housing the Poor in a Colonial City: The Bombay Improvement Trust, 1898–1918 ’, Studies in History , n.s., Vol. 17:1, pp. 57–79 .
29.
Klein, I. (1986), ‘ Urban Development and Death: Bombay City, 1870–1914 ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 20:4, pp. 725–54 .
30.
Köberlein, M. (1998), Solid Waste Collection and Disposal in Delhi: An Applied-geographical Analysis of the Problems Faced by an Indian Metropolis with Managing its Refuse. MA thesis, University of Bamberg (Germany ).
31.
Mann, M. (2004), ‘Torchbearers upon the Path of Progress’ : Britain's Ideology of a “Moral and Material Progress” in India. An Introductory Essay’, in H. Fischer-Tinè and M. Mann , eds, Colonialism as Civilizing Mission. Cultural Ideology in British India, London , pp. 1–26.
32.
Mann, M. (2005), ‘ Turbulent Delhi. Religious Strife, Social Tension and Political Conflicts, 1803–1857 ’, South Asia, n.s., Vol. 28:1, pp. 5–34 .
33.
Mann, M. and Sehrawat, S. (forthcoming), ‘A City with a View: The Afforestation of the Delhi Ridge, 1883–1913’ (forthcoming in Modern Asian Studies 2007).
34.
Masselos, J. (1983), ‘ Jobs and Jobbery: The Sweeper in Bombay under the Raj ’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, Vol. 19, pp. 101–39 .
35.
Meller, H.E. (1979), ‘Urbanization and the Introduction of Modern Town Planning Ideas in India, 1900–1925’, in K.N. Chaudhuri and C.J. Dewey , eds, Economy and Society. Essays in Indian Economic and Social History, Delhi , pp. 330–50.
36.
Nair, P.T. (1990), ‘Civic and Public Services in Old Calcutta’, in S. Chaudhuri , ed., Calcutta. The Living City. Vol. 1, The Past, Delhi , pp. 224–37.
37.
Nightingale, F. (1863), How People may Live and not Die in India, London .
38.
Oldenburg, V.T. (1984), The Making of Colonial Lucknow, 1856–1877, Princeton .
39.
Palmer, R. (1977), Auch das WC hat seine Geschichte, München .
40.
Pieper, J. (1977), Die anglo-indische Station oder die Kolonialisierung des Götterberges. Hindustadtkultur und Kolonialstadtwesen im 19. Jahrhundert als Konfrontation östlicher und westlicher Geisteswelten, Bonn .
41.
Prashad, V. (2001), ‘ The Technology of Sanitation in Colonial Delhi ’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 35:1, pp. 113–55 .
42.
Public Health Report on the Delhi Province for the Year 1928 (1930), Calcutta .
43.
Ramanna, M. (2002), Western Medicine and Public Health in Colonial Bombay, 1845–1895, Hyderabad .
44.
Report on the Sanitary Administration of the Punjab for 1868 (1868), Lahore .
45.
Report on the Sanitary Administration of the Punjab for the Year 1870 (1871), Lahore .
46.
Report on the Sanitary Administration of the Panjab for the Year 1871 (1872), Lahore .
47.
Rothermund, D. (1988), An Economic History of India. From Pre-colonial Times to 1986, London, New York, Sydney .
48.
Simon, W. (1974), Die Britische Militärpolitik in Indien und ihre Auswirkungen auf den britisch-indischen Finanzhaushalt 1878–1910, Wiesbaden .
49.
Singh, K.S. (1999), People of India. National Series, vol. II: The Scheduled Caste, Delhi .
50.
Smith, D.B. (1869), Report on the Drainage and Conservancy of Calcutta, Calcutta .
51.
Spear, P. (1951), Twilight of the Mughuls. Studies in late Mughuls Delhi, Cambridge .
52.
Tarlo, E. (2003), Unsettling Memories. Narratives of the Emergency in Delhi, London .
53.
Tinker, H. (1967/1954), The Foundation of Local Self-Government in India, Pakistan and Burma, Bombay, London .
54.
Tulloch, H. (1865), Report on a Project for the Drainage of Madras, Madras .
55.
Whitcombe, E. (1982), ‘Irrigation’, in Dharma Kumar , ed., The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2, c. 1757–c. 1970, Cambridge , pp. 677–737.
56.
Wright, L. (1960), Clean and Decent—The Fascinating History of the Bathroom and the Water Closet, London .
57.
Yeoh, B.S.A. (2003), Contesting Space in Colonial Singapore. Power Relation and the Urban Built Environment, Singapore .
58.
Zérah, M.H. (2005), ‘Towards an Improved Urban Governance of Public Services: Water Supply and Sanitation’, in E. Hust and M. Mann , eds, Urbanisation and Governance in India, Delhi , pp.127–50.
