This exploratory study aims to investigate the beliefs of college students in Macau, China, regarding teaching and learning in the field of music education, including factors influencing students’ views and their ideal music classroom environment. Employing a Rigorous Mixed Methods Framework that included surveys, observations, interviews, and reflective essays, a sample of (n = 120). Chinese college students and (n = 3) college music instructors were selected for participation. In the initial phase, findings revealed a nuanced perspective among students, demonstrating a stronger preference for the Constructivist Conception over the Traditional Conception. However, during the second and third phases, the findings revealed a preference for traditional and master-apprentice styles of learning in practice. Through the analysis of all three phases of research, this study unveiled a complex and juxtaposed ideology of music learning among Chinese students. While there was a misalignment between students’ ideologies and behaviors, they consistently expressed a desire for a more collaborative, creative, supportive, and open environment in which they can freely share their musical passion. Rather than adhering to a binary approach, the findings suggest the necessity of embracing a more nuanced “Yin-Yang” perspective in Macau.
AllsupR. E. (2015). The eclipse of a higher education or problems preparing artists in a mercantile world. Music Education Research, 17(3), 251–261.
2.
BlairD. V. (2009). Stepping aside: Teaching in a student-centered music classroom. Music Educators Journal, 95(3), 42–45.
3.
BrownK. L. (2003). From teacher-centered to learner-centered curriculum: Improving learning in diverse classrooms. Education, 124(1), 49–54.
4.
BurwellK. (2016). “She did miracles for me”: An investigation of dissonant studio practices in higher education music. Psychology of Music, 44(3), 466–480.
5.
ChanK. W. (2001, December). Validation of a measure of personal theories about teaching and learning [Paper presentation]. AARE 2001 Conference held at Fremantle, Perth, Australia.
6.
ChanK. W. (2004). Preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions about teaching and learning : Cultural implications for research in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 2–13.
7.
ConwayC.ErosJ. (2016). Descriptions of the second stage of music teachers’ careers. Research Studies in Music Education, 38(2), 221–233.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
9.
DanielR. (2006). Exploring music instrument teaching and learning environments: Video analysis as a means of elucidating process and learning outcomes. Music Education Research, 8(2), 191–215.
10.
DongY.WuS. X.WangW.PengS. (2019). Is the student-centered learning style more effective than the teacher-student double-centered learning style in improving reading performance?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2630.
FautleyM. (2019). The assessment of classroom music in the lower secondary school: The English experience. In ElliottD. J.SilvermanM.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical and qualitative assessment in music education (pp. 394–409). Oxford University Press.
13.
FettersM. D. (2016). “Haven’t we always been doing mixed methods research?” Lessons learned from the development of the horseless carriage. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 3–11.
14.
FrambachJ. M.DriessenE. W.BehP.van der VleutenC. P. M. (2014). Quiet or questioning? Students’ discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 1001–1021.
15.
GarnettJ. (2013). Beyond a constructivist curriculum: A critique of competing paradigms in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 30(2), 161–175.
16.
HaP. L.LiB. (2014). Silence as right, choice, resistance and strategy among Chinese “Me Generation” students: Implications for pedagogy. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 233–248.
17.
HarrisonR. L.ReillyT. M.CreswellJ. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495.
18.
HarrisonS.GrantC. (2015). Exploring of new models of research pedagogy: Time to let go of master-apprentice style supervision?Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 556–566.
19.
HuangJ.CowdenP. (2009). Are Chinese students really quiet, passive and surface learners? – A cultural studies perspective. Comparative and International Education, 38(2), 78–80.
20.
JiJ. (2013). Establishing a new paradigm for music education in China: from a constructivist perspective. [Unpublished master’s thesis].
21.
KallioA. A. (2015). Factional stories: Creating a methodological space for collaborative reflection and inquiry in music education research. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 3–20.
KirkpatrickR.ZangY. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 36.
24.
KorthagenF. A.VasalosA. (2010). Going to the core: Deepening reflection by connecting the person to the profession. In LyonsN. (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 529–552). Springer.
25.
Kruse-WeberS.SchiavioA.KirchgäßnerE. M.BucuraE. (2023). Reflective writing in a community music project with students in higher music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(3), 634–652.
26.
LeeK. C. C.LeungB. W. (2022). Instrumental teaching as “the noblest and the most under-praised job”: Multiple case studies of three Hong Kong instrumental teachers. Music Education Research, 24(1), 42–55.
27.
McMullenM.ElickerJ.WangJ.ErdillerZ.LeeS. M.LinC. H.SunP. Y. (2005). Comparing beliefs about appropriate practice among early childhood education and care professionals from the US, China, Taiwan, Korea and Turkey. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(4), 451–464.
28.
MerriamS. B. (2015). Qualitative research: Designing, implementing, and publishing a study. In MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on scholarly publishing and research methods (pp. 125–140). IGI Global.
29.
Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of China. (2011). Yiwu jiaoyu yinyue kecheng biaozhun (2011 Nian ban) [Music curriculum standards of compulsory schooling] (2011 ed.). Beijing Normal University Press.
30.
NeubauerB. E.WitkopC. T.VarpioL. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97.
31.
PalinkasL. A.MendonS. J.HamiltonA. B. (2019). Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 423–442.
32.
PeñalbaA.Martínez-álvarezL.SchiavioA. (2021). The active musical room: Fostering sensorimotor discoveries and musical creativity in toddlers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 69(2), 128–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420953062
33.
PriestT. (2001). Using creativity assessment experience to nurture and predict compositional creativity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345710
34.
RileyP. E. (2013). Curriculum reform in rural China: An exploratory case study. Research and Issues in Music Education, 11(1), 1–13.
35.
RyanM. (2013). The pedagogical balancing act: Teaching reflection in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2), 144–155.
36.
ScottS. (2006). A constructivist view of music education: Perspectives for deep learning. General Music Today, 19(2), 17–21.
37.
SpringJ. (2008). Globalization of education: An introduction. Routledge.
38.
ThorgersenF. C. (2015). The music classroom as a local place and a public space: Democratic education towards music as a language of us all. Svensk tidskrift för musikforskning, 97(1), 61–73.
39.
TianJ. (2014). Understanding Chinese EFL teachers’ beliefs about English with a Yin-Yang perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland]. Research Space at Auckland.
40.
TsegayS. M. (2015). Students’ experience in student-centered learning at higher education institutions in China: A case study. Educare: International Journal for Educational Studies, 7(2), 135–146.
41.
van UdenJ. M.RitzenH.PietersJ. M. (2014). Engaging students: The role of teacher beliefs and interpersonal teacher behavior in fostering student engagement in vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 21–32.
42.
WangC. (2016). Why are my Chinese students so quiet?: A classroom ethnographic study of Chinese students’ peer review activities in an American multilingual writing class. INTESOL Journal, 13(1).
43.
WangD. (2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 157–164.
44.
WarrenC. A. B. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 83–101). Sage.
45.
WigginsJ. (2016). Teaching music with a social constructivist vision of learning. In AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (Eds.), Approaches to teaching general music: Methods, issues, and viewpoints (pp. 49–72). Oxford University Press.
46.
XieJ.LeungB. W. (2011). Students’ motivation to study music: The mainland China context. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(1), 59–72.
47.
YangY.YinA.GuanT. (2021). Mapping music education research in Mainland China (2007–2019): A metadata-based literature analysis. International Journal of Music Education, 39(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420988923
48.
YuZ.LeungB. W. (2019). Music teachers and their implementation of the new Music Curriculum Standards in China. International Journal of Music Education, 37(2), 178–197.
49.
ZhangL. X.LeungB. W.YangY. (2023). From theory to practice: Student-centered pedagogical implementation in primary music demonstration lessons in Guangdong, China. International Journal of Music Education, 41(2), 271–287.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
