Communities of Practice are integral as a network for engaging in regular interactions, sharing resources, and offering support. As online collegiate communities continue to expand, exploration of virtual courses—specifically, the music student teaching seminar—seems necessary. The purpose of this instrumental case study was to describe music student teachers’ (MSTs, N = 20) and instructors’ experiences in a virtual music student teaching seminar in the United States. Data collection included (a) observations of weekly seminar meetings; (b) focus group interviews with MSTs and seminar instructors; (c) text chat transcripts from virtual meetings and the class Facebook® group; and (d) course documents. Findings highlight the successes and challenges of developing, instructing, and facilitating the seminar in a virtual space, the perceived impact of online chat platforms/functions as an instructional and reflective tool, the benefits of regular seminar meetings, and participants’ perceived purpose of the music student teaching seminar.
BaumgartnerC. M. (2014). An examination of music student teaching seminars at Midwestern Universities. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713494013
2.
BaumgartnerC. M.CouncillK. H. (2017). Music student teaching seminars: An examination of current practices across the US. Update Applications of Research in Music Education, 35, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315615183
3.
BaumgartnerC. M.CouncillK. H. (2019). Music student teachers’ experiences in the student teaching seminar: An exploratory study. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719867340
4.
BergM. H.MikszaP. (2010). An investigation of preservice music teacher development and concerns. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710363237
5.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
6.
BowmanJ. (2014). Online learning in music: Foundations, frameworks and practices. Oxford University Press.
7.
BrownJ. S.GrayE. S. (1995). The people are the company. Fast Company, 1(1), 78–82.
8.
CouncillK. H.BaumgartnerC. M. (2017). Student teaching seminars: Ideas for a collaborative and meaningful culminating experience. Music Educators Journal, 104(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432117710314
9.
CouncillK. H.BaumgartnerC. M.IsaacsJ. (2018). A content analysis of music student teaching seminars: Syllabi, assessment tools, and resources [Paper presentation]. National Association for Music Education Music Research and Teacher Education National Conference.
10.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (Eds.). (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
11.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey Bass.
12.
DedeC.Jass KetelhutD.WhitehouseP.BreitL.McCloskeyE. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554
13.
FitzpatrickK. R. (2014). Blogging through the music student teaching experience: Developing virtual communities of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x13509350
14.
FosterM. (1994). Effective black teachers: A literature review. In HollinsE.KingJ.HaymentW. (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 225–242). State University of New York Press.
15.
FranzakJ. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of Critical Friends Practice on the student teacher. English in Education, 34(4), 258–280.
16.
FussellS. R.BenimoffN. I. (1995). Social and cognitive processes in interpersonal communication: Implications for advanced telecommunications technologies. Human Factors, 37(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064546
17.
GurgelR. (2016). Taught by the students: Culturally relevant pedagogy and deep engagement in music education. Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
HanesJ. M.SchillerM. (1994). Collaborating with cooperating teachers in preservice art education. Studies in Art Education, 35(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320530
19.
HeilL.BergM. H. (2017). Something happened on the way to completing the edTPA: A case study of teacher candidates’ perceptions. Contributions to Music Education, 42, 181–199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367442
20.
HermanC. H. (2021). Student perceptions of online peer learning in preservice music teacher education: Motivation, social-emotional learning, and classroom climate (Order No. 28322969) [Master’s thesis, Colorado State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
21.
JangH.ReeveJ.DeciE. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Education & Psychology, 102, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
22.
KozielE. B. (2018). Are we lovin’ it?: The edTPA and the McDonaldization of music teacher training (Order No. 10788085) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Memphis]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
23.
LewisD.AllanB. (2005). Virtual learning communities: A guide for practitioners. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
24.
LitosselitiL. (2003). Using focus groups in research. A&C Black.
25.
MalekoE. V.Kiva-KhamzinaY. L.RubanovaN. A.КаrpovaE. V.PluginaN. A.TrutnevA. Y. (2021). Peculiarities of distance learning in higher education: The teacher’s functions as a chat communication organizer. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5533
26.
Marín-DíazV.RecheE.MartínJ. (2022). University virtual learning in covid times. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 27, 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09533-2
27.
MasalimovaA. R.KhvatovaM. A.ChikilevaL. S.ZvyagintsevaE. P.StepanovaV. V.MelnikM. V. (2022). Distance learning in higher education during Covid-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
28.
McLoughlinC.LeeM. J. W. (2010). Developing an online community to promote engagement and professional learning for pre-service teachers using social software tools. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 12(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2010010102
29.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (Eds.). (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
31.
MinelloA.MartucciS.ManzoL. K. C. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: Present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23, S82–S94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1809690
32.
OkraskiC. V.KissauS. P. (2018). Impact of content-specific seminars on candidate edTPA preparation and performance. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12351
33.
ParkesK. A.PowellS. R. (2015). Is the edTPA the right choice for evaluating teacher readiness?Arts Education Policy Review, 116(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.944964
PutzP.ArnoldP. (2001). Communities of practice: Guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education. Education Communication and Information, 1(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310120091922
36.
SchelskeM.DenoS. (1994). The effects of content-specific seminars on student teachers’ effectiveness. Action in Teacher Education, 16(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1994.10463185
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
39.
StaniscuaskiF.KmetzschL.SolettiR. C.ReichertF.ZandonàE.LudwigZ. M. C.LimaE. F.NeumannA.SchwartzI. V. D.Mello-CarpesP. B.TamajusukuA. S. K.WerneckF. P.RicachenevskyF. K.InfangerC.SeixasA.StaatsC. C.de OliveiraL. (2021). Gender, race and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: From survey to action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663252
40.
StraussS. G. (1996). Getting a clue: Communication and information distribution effects on group process and performance. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271006
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
44.
ZeichnerK. M.ListonD. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
