Didactic transposition occurs when scholarly knowledge is transformed into knowledge to be taught in order to reach didactical suitability. In this study, we explore didactic transposition implemented in music lessons from the perspective of didactical suitability. Utilising Design-Based Research, the current study collected qualitative and quantitative data from three urban schools in the Chartered Community of Navarre, Spain. Findings reveal that didactic transposition depends on the teacher’s beliefs because, while one-to-one teaching and academicism are preferred by educators who prioritise music theory, collective teaching and creativity are promoted by teachers who favour holistic development. In conclusion, didactic transposition enables the aspiration to didactical suitability, explaining the characteristics of didactic contracts. Lastly, some pedagogical implications are provided.
AldousC. (2019). Unlocking creativity in solving novel mathematics problems: Cognitive and non-cognitive perspectives and approaches. Routledge.
2.
Angel-AlvaradoR. (2018a). Music teacher motivation in Spanish primary education: A study based on the self-determination theory (Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Spain). https://academica-e.unavarra.es/xmlui/handle/2454/32531
3.
Angel-AlvaradoR. (2018b). Controversies between curriculum theory and educational practice in music education. Revista Electrónica Complutense de Investigación en Educación Musical, 15, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.5209/RECIEM.58530
4.
Angel-AlvaradoR. (2021). ‘Buen Vivir’ and colonialism: Towards decolonial pedagogies in South America. Revista Electrónica de LEEME,48, 94–114. https://doi.org/10.7203/LEEME.48.21662
5.
Angel-AlvaradoR.BelletichO.WilhelmiM. R. (2020). Exploring motivation in music teachers: The case of three primary schools in Spain. British Journal of Music Education, 37(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051720000145
6.
Angel-AlvaradoR.Casas-MasA.López-ÍñiguezG.JohnsonL. (2023). Patterns of variation in sociomusical identity of school-goers in a condition of social vulnerability and musical gaps in their education. Music Education Research, 25(1), 74–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2128318
7.
Angel-AlvaradoR.López-ÍñiguezG.Quiroga-FuentesI.Gárate-GonzálezB. (2022). Mapping the cultural elements that support and inhibit music teachers’ sociomusical identities in Chile. Musicae Scientiae, 26(4), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221110834
8.
Angel-AlvaradoR.WilhelmiM. R.BelletichO. (2019). Holistic architecture for music education: A research design for carrying out empiric and interdisciplinary studies in didactics of music. Itamar, 5, 335–357. https://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/71515
9.
BallantyneJ.PackerJ. (2004). Effectiveness of preservice music teacher education programs: Perceptions of early-career music teachers. Music Education Research, 6, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380042000281749
10.
BarabS. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering. In SawyerK. R. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 270–302). Cambridge University Press.
11.
BeardD.GloagK. (2016). Musicology: The key concepts. Routledge.
12.
BelletichO.WilhelmiM. R.Angel-AlvaradoR. (2016). The musical education in primary education of Spain. Spread the curriculum as a problem. Perspectiva Educacional, 55(2), 158–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.55-Iss.2-Art.454
13.
BernsteinB. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
14.
BiasuttiM.ConcinaE. (2018). The effective music teacher: The influence of personal, social, and cognitive dimensions on music teacher self-efficacy. Musicae Scientiae, 22(2), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916685929
15.
BiasuttiM.ConcinaE.DeloughryC.FrateS.KonkolG.MangiacottiA.Rotar PanceB.VidulinS. (2021). The effective music teacher: A model for predicting music teacher’s self-efficacy. Psychology of Music, 49(6), 1498–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620959436
16.
BiestaG.MiedemaS. (2002). Instruction or pedagogy? The need for a transformative conception of education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00062-2
17.
BolondiG.FerrettiF.GibertiC. (2018). Didactic contract as a key to interpreting gender differences in maths. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2018(18), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2018-018-bolo
18.
BrienM.ForestJ.MageauG.BoudriasJ.DesrumauxP.BrunetL.MorinE. (2012). The basic psychological needs at work scale: Measurement invariance between Canada and France. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 4(2), 167–187.
19.
BrousseauG. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Springer.
CareyG.HarrisonS.DwyerR. (2017). Encouraging reflective practice in conservatoire students: A pathway to autonomous learning?Music Education Research, 19(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1238060
23.
CarreroV.SorianoR.TrinidadA. (2012). Teoría fundamentada Grounded theory: El desarrollo de la teoría desde la generalización conceptual. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
24.
Casas-MasA.PozoJ. I.MonteroI. (2014). The influence of music learning cultures on the construction of teaching-learning conceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051714000096
25.
ChevallardY. (1997). La transposición didáctica: Del saber sabio al saber enseñado. Aique.
26.
ChevallardY.BoschM. (2020). Didactic transposition in mathematics education. In LermanS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 214–218). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_48
27.
DavenportE. C.DavisonM.LiouP.LoveQ. (2015). Reliability, dimensionality, and internal consistency as defined by Cronbach: Distinct albeit related concepts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 4–9.
28.
DrouinM.StewartJ.Van GorderK. (2015). Using methodological triangulation to examine the effectiveness of a mentoring program for online instructors. Distance Education, 36(3), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081735
29.
European Commission. (2013). Ethics for researchers: Facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publication Office of the European Union.
30.
FautleyM. (2010). Assessment in music education. Oxford University Press.
31.
FieldA. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage.
32.
Georgii-HemmingE.LilliedahlJ. (2014). Why “what” matters: On the content dimension of music didactics. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 22(2), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.22.2.132
33.
GodinoJ. D.BataneroC.FontV. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135.
34.
GodinoJ. D.BencomoD.FontV.WilhelmiM. R. (2006). Análisis y valoración de la idoneidad didáctica de procesos de estudio de las matemáticas. Paradigma, XXVII(2), 221–252.
35.
GodinoJ. D.FontV.WilhelmiM. R.De Castro HernándezC. (2009). An onto-semiotic approach to the normative dimension in mathematics education. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 27(1), 59–76. https://raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/132207
36.
GodinoJ. D.WilhelmiM. R.BencomoD. (2005). Suitability criteria for a mathematical instruction. A teaching experience with the function notion. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 1–26.
37.
GómezM. (2005). La transposición didáctica: Historia de un concepto. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 1(1), 83–115.
38.
GreenL. (2017). Music, informal learning, and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Routledge.
39.
GrieserD. R.HendricksK. S. (2018). Review of literature: Pedagogical content knowledge and string teacher preparation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318760970
40.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB., J.AndersonR. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education.
41.
HallamS.RintaT.VarvarigouM.CreechA.PapageorgiI.GomesT.LanipekunJ. (2012). The development of practising strategies in young people. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 652–680.
42.
HessJ. (2019). Singing our own song: Navigating identity politics through activism in music. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18773094
43.
Hesse-BiberS. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. The Guilford Press.
44.
HolguínP.ShifresF. (2015). Escuchar música al sur del Río Bravo: Desarrollo y formación del oído musical desde una perspectiva latinoamericana. Calle 14, 10(15), 40–53.
45.
HooperG. (2016). The discourse of musicology. Routledge.
LilliedahlJ. (2015). The recontextualisation of knowledge: Towards a social realist approach to curriculum and didactics. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27008
48.
López-ÍñiguezG.PozoJ. I. (2014). The influence of teachers’ conceptions on their students’ learning: Children’s understanding of sheet music. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12026
49.
McKenneyS.ReevesT. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.
MECD. (2014). Orden ECD/686/2014, de 23 de abril, por la que se establece el currículo de la Educación Primaria para el ámbito de la gestión del MECD y se regula su implantación, así como la evaluación y determinados aspectos organizativos de la etapa. BOE, 106, 33827–34369. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2014/04/23/ecd686
52.
MellingerC. D.HansonT. A. (2017). Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. Routledge.
53.
MertensD. M.Hesse-BiberS. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 75–79.
54.
MurilloF.Martínez-GarridoC. (2012). Análisis de datos cuantitativos con SPSS en investigación socioeducativa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
55.
NielsenF. V. (2007) Music (and Arts) Education from the point of view of didaktik and bildung. In BreslerL. (Eds.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 265–285). Springer.
56.
Pacheco-CostaA. (2019). Teachers’ strategies for playing by ear in one-to-one instrumental lessons: A case-study in Spain. Music Education Research, 21(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1553943
57.
PozoJ. I.Pérez-EcheverríaM. P.TorradoJ. A.López-ÍñiguezG. (2020). Aprender y enseñar música: Un enfoque centrado en el alumnado. Morata.
58.
RosenthalJ. A. (2012). Statistic and data interpretation for social work. Springer.
59.
San MartínD. (2014). Grounded theory and Atlas.ti: Methodological resources for educational research. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 16(1), 104–122.
60.
SchneuwlyB.VollmerH. J. (2018). Bildung and subject didactics: Exploring a classical concept for building new insights. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117696096
61.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
62.
SpruceG. (2017). The power of discourse: Reclaiming social justice from and for music education. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 45(6), 720–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1347127
SwanwickK. (2016). A developing discourse in Music Education: The selected works of Keith Swanwick. Routledge.
65.
VäkeväL.WesterlundH. (2007). The ‘method’ of democracy in music education. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 6(4), 96–108.
66.
WesterlundH. (2003). Reconsidering aesthetic experience in praxial music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 11(1), 45–62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
