Fostering accurate musical self-perceptions may be particularly challenging when developing singing technique, where self-assessment is complicated by the close physiological and emotional relationship between the performer and the body-instrument. The aim of the present study was to investigate how vocal students’ beliefs in their performance capabilities were influenced by the four sources of self-efficacy and other personal/contextual factors. Nine vocalists at a private university in the western United States completed the Vocal Performance Self-Efficacy Survey, participated in two follow-up interviews, and provided written reflections about experiences that fostered or hindered their performance belief. Participants reported that they moved from a reliance on external assessments of capability to self-appraisal as they (a) refined technique through practice and performance, (b) observed coping and master models, (c) managed feedback from others, (d) attuned to physiological and emotional sensations, and (e) exercised cognitive self-regulation. Eight of nine interview participants reported that physiological and affective states most affected their performance belief. Findings indicate the importance of nurturing vocal students’ performance beliefs by utilizing the four sources of self-efficacy, fostering qualities of persistence and resilience, teaching agentic causation, fostering productive student/teacher relationships, and creating emotionally safe learning and performance environments.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
2.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
3.
ChapmanJ. (2006). Singing and teaching singing: A holistic approach to classical voice. Plural Publishing.
4.
ClarkT.LisboaT.WilliamonA. (2014). An investigation into musicians’ thoughts and perceptions during performance. Research Studies in Music Education, 36, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x14523531
DoscherB. M. (1994). The functional unity of the singing voice (2nd ed.). The Scarecrow Press.
8.
DukeR. A.HenningerJ. C. (2002). Teachers’ verbal corrections and observers’ perceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345694
9.
Frey-MonellR. (2011). An exploratory study of criterion referenced self-assessment in the applied vocal practice room (Publication No. 3484345) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
10.
GonzálezA.Blanco-PiñeiroP.Díaz-PereiraM. P. (2018). Music performance anxiety: Exploring structural relations with self-efficacy, boost, and self-rated performance. Psychology of Music, 46(6), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617727822
11.
HendricksK. S. (2009). Relationships between the sources of self-efficacy and changes in competence perceptions of music students during an all-state orchestra event (Publication No. 3362920) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
12.
HendricksK. S. (2014). Changes in self-efficacy beliefs over time: Contextual influences of gender, rank-based placement, and social support in a competitive orchestra environment. Psychology of Music, 42(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612471238
13.
HendricksK. S. (2016). The sources of self-efficacy: Educational research and implications for music. Update Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315576535
14.
HirschornD. N. (2011). Vocal improvisation and the development of musical self-efficacy and musical self-image in adolescent choral musicians[Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest dissertations and theses. (Order No. 3471637)
15.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BrownS. D.GoreP. A. (1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045
16.
LewisM. C. (2018). “I think I can!”: The influences of the four sources of self-efficacy upon the development of vocal performance belief in nine classical collegiate vocalists (Publication No. 10808879) [Doctoral dissertation, Boston University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
17.
MarshallZ. K. (2011). The necessity of extra-curricular activities for the undergraduate vocal performance major: How performance opportunity correlates with (Publication No. 3454765) [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
O’BryanJ. (2014). Investigating participant values, beliefs and practices in one-to-one tertiary classical singing lessons: A collective case study [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2015.365
20.
O’BryanJ. (2015). “We are our instrument!”: Forming a singer identity. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x15592831
21.
PapageorgiI.HaddonE.CreechA.MortonF.De BezenacC.HimonidesE.PotterJ.DuffyC.WhytonT.WelchG. (2010). Institutional culture and learning II: Inter-relationships between perceptions of the learning environment and undergraduate musicians’ attitudes to performance. Music Education Research, 12(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2010.520432
22.
RegierB. J. (2021). Examining relationships among concert band directors’ efficacious sources, self-efficacy for teaching strategies, and effective teaching skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68, 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420943137
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2012). Self-efficacy as a predictor of musical performance quality. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 6(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029619
25.
RoyoJ. (2014). Self-efficacy in music education vocal instruction: A collective case study of four undergraduate vocal music education majors (Publication No.3619734) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
26.
SchmidtA. M.DeShonR. P. (2010). The moderating effects of performance ambiguity on the relationship between self-efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018289
27.
SchunkD. H.UsherE. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). Oxford University Press.
28.
Serra-DawaS. (2015). The teacher-student relationship in one-to-one singing lessons: An investigation of personality and adult attachment. In HarrisonS.O’BryanJ. (Eds.), Teaching singing in the 21st century (pp. 201–220). Springer.
29.
SmithW. S.ChipmanM. (2007). The naked voice: A wholistic approach to singing. Oxford University Press.
30.
SweetB. (2018). Voice change and singing experiences of adolescent females. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418763790
31.
SweetB.ParkerE. C. (2019). Female vocal identity development: A phenomenology. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418809981
32.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.Mac IverD.ReumanD. A.MidgleyC. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in Children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.552
ZelenakM. S. (2015). Measuring the sources of self-efficacy among secondary school music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414555018
