This practitioner research, conducted by a secondary school music teacher, deals with two complementary questions: the conceptual question how one could define the ‘artistry’ of a music teacher in the context of his teaching practice, and the empirical question in how far the music teacher’s actions can determine the quality of the musical interactions with his students. The paper elaborately describes the institutional context for this (doctoral) practitioner research study, and integrates two premises, one regarding the negative image of the school subject music, and another about the vagueness and the ongoing discussions about the required competences of a ‘good’ music teacher. The first question is dealt with in a theoretical way, resulting in a working definition for a music teacher’s ‘artistry’: ‘a music teacher’s “artistry” lies within the extent to which he can apply his musical competences in “immediate” teaching situations’. The second question is studied empirically using a set of qualitative data sources, derived from the practitioner researcher’s teaching practice, that were analysed by means of a self-developed ‘three-dimensional matrix of the music teacher’s real-time teaching actions’. This results in a set of 10 categories in which the music teacher clearly demonstrates ‘unprepared non-routinised musical actions’.
BernardR. (2004). A dissonant duet: Discussions of music making and music teaching. Music Education Research, 6(3), 281–298.
2.
BoogB.SlagterM.Jacobs-MoonenI.MeijeringF. (Eds.). (2005). Focus op action research: De professional als handelingsonderzoeker [Focus on action research: The professional as action researcher]. Van Gorcum.
3.
BowmanW. (2007). Who is the “We”? Rethinking professionalism in music education. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 6(4), 109–131.
4.
BowmanW. (2009). Professional knowledge: Imagining the obvious as if it weren’t. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 8(1), 1–11.
5.
BreslerL. (2005). What musicianship can teach educational research. Music Education Research, 7(2), 169–183.
6.
BrunerJ. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
7.
ByrneC. (2005). Pedagogical communication in the music classroom. In MiellD.MacDonaldR.HargreavesD. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 301–319). Oxford University Press.
8.
CainT. (2008). The characteristics of action research in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 25(3), 283–313.
9.
CampbellP. S. (2008). Musician & teacher: An orientation to music education. W.W. Norton & Company.
10.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Erlbaum.
11.
ConklingS. W. (2004). Music teacher practice and identity in professional development partnerships. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 3(3), 1–15.
12.
De BaetsT. (2012). On-the-spot music teaching: De muziekleraar in onmiddellijke muzikale interacties [On-the-spot music teaching: The music teacher in immediate musical interactions] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven].
13.
De BaetsT. (2013). Towards an ‘endogenous’ definition of a music teachers’ artistry. In de VugtA.MalmbergI. (Eds.), Craftmanship & artistry (European perspectives on music education (Vol. 2, pp. 179–192). Helbling.
14.
De BaetsT. (2014). Improvised music instruction. In De BaetsT.BuchbornT. (Eds.), The reflective music teacher (European perspectives on music education (Vol. 3, pp. 239–255). Helbling.
15.
De BaetsT.NijsL. (2015). Onderzoek door muziekdocenten, is dat wel wetenschap? [Research by music teachers, is that science?]. Cultuur+Educatie, 15(42), 8–19.
16.
De VugtA. (2010). Muziekpedagogisch onderzoek in het muziekvakonderwijs [music education research in higher music education]. In van HoornM. (Ed.), Alle registers open: Nieuwe ontwikkelingen in onderzoek naar muziekeducatie [All registers open: New developments in research in music education] (cultuur+educatie, Vol. 28) (pp. 34–52). Cultuurnetwerk Nederland.
17.
docARTES. (2011). Doctoral programme in musical arts. docARTES. www.docartes.be.
18.
DolkM. (1997). Onmiddellijk onderwijsgedrag: Over denken en handelen van leraren in onmiddellijke onderwijssituaties [Immediate teaching behaviour: About thinking and acting of teachers in immediate educational situations] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht].
19.
DolloffL. (2007). “All the things we are”: Balancing our multiple identities in music teaching. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 6(2), 1–21.
20.
EiholzerH. (2009). The value of musical performance (Working Paper for RITM Seminar at Orpheus Instituut). Orpheus Instituut.
21.
ElliottD. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. Oxford University Press.
22.
ElliottD.SilvermanM. (2015). Music matters: A philosophy of music education (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
23.
ElliottD.SilvermanM.BowmanW. (Eds.). (2016). Artistic citizenship: Artistry, social responsibility, and ethical praxis. Oxford University Press.
24.
ErautM. (1995). Schon shock: A case for refraining reflection-in-action?Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 9–22.
25.
EveleinF.SandbrinkA.RuttenM. (2007). Betrokkenheid en veelzijdigheid: Seminar van opleiders docent muziek [Engagement and versatillity: Seminar of the music teacher educators]. Kunstzone, 6(6), 22–24.
26.
FroehlichH. (2009). Institutional belonging, pedagogic discourse and music teacher education: The paradox of routinization. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 6(3), 7–21.
27.
GagnéR. M.WagerW. W.GolasK. C.KellerJ. M. (1995). Principles of instructional design. Cengage Learning.
28.
HennessyS. (2009). The conditions and consequences of reflective practices in arts education. In BurnardP.HennessyS. (Eds.), Reflective practices in arts education (pp. 183–192). Springer.
29.
HoldhusK.HøisæterS.MælandK.VangsnesV.EngelsenK. S.EspelandM.Espeland. (2016). Improvisation in teaching and education: Roots and applications. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–17.
30.
HoldhusK.MurphyR.EspelandM. I. (Eds.). (2021). Music education as craft. Springer.
31.
IvOK. (2008). Jaarboek 2007: Instituut voor Onderzoek in de Kunsten [Yearbook 2007: Institute for the research in the arts]. Acco.
32.
JanssenF. (2009). Naar beslisondersteuning voor docenten: Modelgestuurd leren van succes [Towards decision support for teachers: Model-driven learning by success]. Internal publication ICLON, Universiteit Leiden.
33.
JorgensenE. (2008). The art of teaching music. Indiana University Press.
KorthagenF.KlaassenC.RussellT. (2000). New learning in teacher education. In SimonsR.-J.van der LindenJ.DuffyT. (Eds.), New learning (pp. 243–260). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
36.
KorthagenF.LagerwerfB. (2008). Leren van binnenuit: Onderwijsontwikkeling in een nieuwe tijd [Learning from the inside: Educational development in a new era]. Uitgeverij Nelissen.
37.
meNet. (2009). meNet Lernergebnisse in der Musiklehrerbildung [meNet learning outcomes in music teacher training]. Institut für Musikpädagogik.
38.
MortelmansD. (2007). Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden [Handbook qualitative research methods]. Acco.
39.
PotterW. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
RegelskiT. A. (2007). Editorial “music teacher”: Meaning and practice, identity and position. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 6(2), 2–35.
41.
RobertsB. (2004). Who’s in the mirror? Issues surrounding the identity construction of music educators. Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 3(2), 1–42.
42.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
43.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey Bass.
44.
SmildeR. (2009). Musicians as lifelong learners: Discovery through biography. Eburon Academic Publishers.
ThiessenD.BarrettJ. (2002). Reform-minded music teachers: A more comprehensive image of teaching for music teacher education. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 759–785). Oxford University Press.
47.
TörnquistE. (2007). The staging of learning: Teachers’ reflections on their pedagogical work in an artistic practice. In FolkestadG. (Ed.), A decade of research in music education (pp. 175–196). Malmö Academy of Music.
48.
VerloopN.Van DrielJ.MeijerP. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 441–461.
