This article reports long-term fieldwork on jamming funk musicians’ interaction from a combined anthropological, ethnographic, and grounded theory perspective. The study draws from over 20 years of data collection through personal interviews with New Orleans funk musicians, personal experiences with jamming and second-lining, and participant observation of funk jam sessions and second line parades. Also the author’s personal funk jam teaching experiences are included. The article is in four parts to mark the historical phases in the longitudinal research process towards a theoretical, empirical argument for how funk musicians think and act when they jam. The final theory suggests funk jamming to be guided by overarching notions of “making the music feel good” and “making them dance” and in an iterative spiral process of “open approach,” “prioritized focusing,” “categorical reflection,” and “artistic realization.” Based on this, some educational implications for learning and teaching how to jam conclude the article.
AtkinsonP.HammersleyM. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage
2.
AttasR. E. (2011). Meter as process in groove-based popular music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of British Colombia, Vancouver.
3.
BarfieldO. (1965). Saving the appearances: A study in idolatry. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4.
BeckerH. S. (2000). The etiquette of improvisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(3), 171–176.
5.
BerlinerP. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BrinckL. (2012). Bringing drumsticks to funerals: Jamming as learning. Nordiske udkast40(2)[Outlines], 16–30.
7.
BrinckL. (2014). Ways of the jam: Collective and improvisational perspectives on learning (Doctoral dissertation). Aalborg University, Denmark.
8.
BrinckL. (2017). Jamming and learning: Analysing changing collective practice of changing participation. Music Education Research, 19(2), 219–235.
9.
BrinckL.TanggaardL. (2016). Embracing the unpredictable: Leadership, learning, changing practice. Human Resource Development International, 19(5), 374–387.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
11.
CharmazK. (2013). Grounded theory. In International Conference of Qualitative inquiry. Urbana/Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
12.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
13.
ComaroffJ.ComaroffJ. (2003). Ethnography on an awkward scale: Postcolonial anthropology and the violence of abstraction. Ethnography, 4(2), 147–179.
14.
DanielsenA. (2006). Presence and pleasure. The funk grooves of James Brown and Parliament. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
15.
DeleuzeG. (2013/1968). Difference and repetition. (PattonP., Trans.). London: Bloomsbury.
16.
DempseyN. P. (2008). Hook-ups and train wrecks: Contextual parameters and the coordination of jazz interactions. Symbolic Interaction, 31(1), 57–75.
17.
DoffmanM. R. (2008). Feeling the groove: Shared time and its meanings for three jazz trios (Doctoral dissertation). Open University, UK.
18.
DoffmanM. R. (2011). Jammin’ an ending: Creativity, knowledge, and conduct among jazz musicians. Twentieth-century Music, 8(2), 203–225.
19.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. San Francisco: Sociology Press.
20.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
GoodwinM. (1973). Liner notes. The New Orleans Nightcrawlers: Funknicity [CD 2154]. Burlington, MA: Rounder Records.
22.
GruenhagenL. M.WhitcombR. (2014). Improvisational practices in elementary general music classrooms. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 379–395.
23.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1997). Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
HallS. (2003). Marx’s notes on method: A “reading” of the “1857 Introduction.” Cultural Studies, 17(2), 113–49.
25.
HargreavesW. (2012). Generating ideas in jazz improvisation: Where theory meets practice. International Journal of Music Education, 30(4), 354–367.
26.
HastyC. (1997). Meter as rhythm. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
HodsonR. (2007). Interaction, interplay, and improvisation in jazz. New York: Routledge.
28.
HughesT. S. (2003). Groove and flow: Six analytical essays on the music of Stevie Wonder (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 2003). Ann Arbor: Proquest Information and Learning.
29.
KeilC. (1987). Participatory discrepancies and the power of music. Cultural Anthropology, 2(3), 275–283.
30.
KeilC. (1995). The theory of participatory discrepancies: A progress report. Ethnomusicology, 39(1), 1–19.
31.
KeilC.FeldS. (1994). Music grooves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KennyB.GellrichM. (2002). Improvisation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. (Eds.), The science and psychology of musical performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 117–134). New York: Oxford University Press.
la DefénseP. O. (2011). Time out of mind: The experience of being in time in musical improvisation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Paris, Paris.
35.
LaveJ. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
36.
LesterM.HaddenS. (1980). Ethnomethodology and grounded theory methodology: An integration of perspective and method. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 9(1), 3–33.
37.
LimbC. J.BraunA. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS One, 3(2), e1679.
38.
MartinP. J. (2006). Musicians’ worlds: Music-making as a collaborative activity. Symbolic Interaction, 29(1), 95–107.
39.
MeyerL. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
MichaelsenG. (2013). Analyzing musical interaction in jazz improvisation of the 1960s (Unpublisherd doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
41.
MondorT.ZatoreR. J. (1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of experimental psychology, 21(2), 387–409.
42.
MonkA. (2012). The five improvisation “brains”: A pedagogical model for jazz improvisation at high school and undergraduate level. International Journal of Music Education, 30(2), 89–98.
43.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
MouritzenF. (2001). Refleksivitet og refleksionstyper i børns udtryksformer [Reflexivity and types of reflection in children’s differing expressions]. Tidsskrift for Børne- og Ungdomskultur, 43, 170–191.
45.
NorgaardM. (2011). Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 109–127.
46.
PessoaL. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?Trends Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160–166.
47.
PiagetJ. (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
48.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1997). Reporting qualitative research as practice. In TierneyW. G.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 3–22). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
RegisH. (1999). Second lines, minstrelsy, and the contested landscapes of New Orleans Afro-Creole Festivals. Cultural Anthropology, 14(4), 472–504.
51.
ReinholdssonP. (1998). Making music together: An interactionist perspective on small-group performance in jazz. Uppsala University, Musicology. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
52.
RinzlerP. (2008). The contradictions of jazz. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
53.
RogersS. E. (2013). Researching musical improvisation: Questions and challenges. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23(4), 269–272.
54.
RoseR.McDonaldR. (2015). The process of improvisation. In BeechN.GilmoreC. (Eds.), Organising music: Theory, practice, performance (pp. 181–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
55.
SakakeenyM. (2010). “Under the bridge”: An orientation to soundscapes in New Orleans. Ethnomusicology54(1), 1–27.
56.
SakakeenyM (2011). New Orleans music as a circulatory system. Black Music Research Journal, 31(2): 291–325
57.
SawyerR. (1992). Improvisational creativity: An analysis of jazz performance. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3), 253–263.
58.
SawyerR. (1996). The semiotics of improvisation: The pragmatics of musical and verbal performance. Semiotica, 108(3/4), 269–306.
59.
SawyerR. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theatre, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
SawyerR. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
SmallC. (1996). Music, society, education. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
62.
StewartA. (2000). “Funky drummer”: New Orleans, James Brown and the rhythmic transformation of American popular music. Popular Music, 19(3), 293–318.
63.
SudnowD. (1978). Ways of the hand: The organization of improvised conduct. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
64.
TurinoT. (2009). Formulas and improvisation in participatory music. In SolisG.NettlB. (Eds.), Musical Improvisation (p. 103–116). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
65.
ZbikowskiL. M. (2004). Modelling the groove: Conceptual structure and popular music. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 129(2), 272–297.
