This study examined trainee music teachers’ judgements of the musical creativity of secondary age students. Nine pieces of music composed by Year 8 students (13 years of age) were evaluated by 17 postgraduate, trainee teachers. These musical pieces were sorted into a diamond-shaped formation according to how creative they were perceived to be with the most creative pieces placed at the top and the least creative ones placed at the bottom of the diamond. This approach helped the trainee teachers achieve some agreement in their evaluation of the students’ creativity. As well as a practical approach to recognizing musical creativity, the analysis of the trainees’ responses led to the identification of some attributes, such as representing the stimulus idea well and making imaginative use of musical elements and musical devices, which can help teachers to recognize, evaluate and promote children’s creative responses in music.
AmabileT. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
3.
AmabileT. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.
4.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
BaerJ.McKoolS. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In SchreinerC. S. (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65–77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
6.
BalkinA. (1985). The creative music classroom: Laboratory for creativity in life. Music Educators Journal, 71(5), 42–46.
7.
BanajiS.BurnA.BuckinghamD. (2010). The rhetorics of creativity: A review of the literature (2nd ed.). London, UK: Creative Partnerships, Arts Council England.
BeghettoR. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 1–9.
10.
BesemerS. P.O’QuinK. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287–296.
11.
BalkinA. (1990). What is creativity? What is it not?Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 29-32.
12.
BlackP.HarrisonC.LeeC.MarshallB.WiliamD. (2004). Working inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.
13.
BrinkmanD. J. (1999). Problem finding, creativity style and the musical compositions of high school students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 62–68.
14.
BurnardP. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
BurnardP.WhiteJ. (2008). Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 667–682.
16.
ByrneC.MacDonaldR.CarltonL. (2003). Assessing creativity in musical compositions: Flow as an assessment tool. British Journal of Music Education, 20(3), 277–290.
17.
CarruthersP. (2002). Human creativity. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 53, 225–249.
18.
CACE (Central Advisory Council for Education). (1967). Children and their primary schools (The Plowden Report). London, UK: HMSO.
19.
ClarkJ. (2009, September). Exploring the use of diamond ranking activities as a visual methods research tool. Paper presented at the 1st International Visual Methods Conference, University of Leeds, UK.
20.
ClaxtonG. (2006). Thinking at the edge: Soft creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 351–362.
21.
CohenL.HollidayM. (1982). Statistics for social scientists. London, UK: Harper & Row.
22.
CraftA. (2001). Little c creativity. In CraftA.JeffreyB.LeiblingM. (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45–61). London, UK: Continuum.
23.
CropleyA. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
24.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
25.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In SteptoeA. (Ed.), Genius and mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39–64). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
DineenR.CollinsE. (2005). Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education. Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(1), 43–51.
27.
DunnR. E. (1997). Creative thinking and music listening. Research Studies in Music Education, 8, 42–55.
28.
EisnerE. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
ElliottR. (1972). Aesthetic theory and the experience of art. In OsborneH. (Ed.), Aesthetics (pp. 145–157). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1971)
30.
FautleyM. (2004). Teacher intervention strategies in the composing processes of lower secondary school students. International Journal of Music Education, 22(3), 201–218.
31.
FautleyM.SavageJ. (2011). Assessment of composing in the lower secondary school in the English National Curriculum. British Journal of Music Education, 28(1), 51–67.
32.
FeldhusenJ. F.GohB. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.
33.
GadamerH. (2004). Truth and method. London, UK: Continuum.
34.
GinocchioJ. (2003). Making composition work in your music program. Music Educators Journal, 90(1), 51–55.
35.
HargreavesD. J.MacDonaldR.MiellD. (2012). Explaining musical imaginations: Creativity, performance, and perception. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
HennessyS. (2014). Creativity in the music curriculum. In WilsonA. (Ed.), Creativity in primary education (pp.219–
233). London: Sage Publications.
37.
HickeyM. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical composition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234–244.
38.
HigginsL. (2008). The creative music workshop: Event, facilitation, gift. International Journal of Music Education, 26(4), 326–338. doi:10.1177/0255761408096074
JonesP.RobsonC. (2008). Teaching music in primary schools. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.
41.
KaufmanC. J.PluckerJ. A.BaerJ. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
KokotsakiD. (2011). Student-teachers’ conceptions of creativity in the secondary music classroom. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 6(2), 100–113.
43.
KokotsakiD. (2013, December). [Review of the book Musical creativities in practice, by BurnardP.]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 1–2. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.05.001
44.
KoutsoupidouT.HargreavesD. J. (2009). An experimental study of the effects of improvisation on the development of children’s creative thinking in music. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 251–278.
45.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
46.
KratusJ. (1990). Structuring the music curriculum for creative learning. Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 33-37.
47.
LanierV. (1975). Objectives of art education. Peabody Journal of Education, 52(3), 180–186.
48.
LeungC. C.WanY. Y.LeeA. (2009). Assessment of undergraduate students’ music compositions. International Journal of Music Education, 27(3), 250–268. doi:10.1177/0255761409337275
49.
MacDonaldR.ByrneC.CarltonL. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34, 292–306.
50.
MajorA. (2007). Talking about composing in secondary school music lessons. British Journal of Music Education, 24(2), 165–178.
51.
MarshJ. (2010). Childhood, culture and creativity: A literature review. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Creativity, Culture and Education.
52.
MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.
53.
MartonF.BoothS. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
NACCCE (National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London, UK: DfEE.
55.
NewtonD. P. (2010). Assessing the creativity of scientific explanations in elementary science: An insider–outsider view of intuitive assessment in the hypothesis space. Research in Science and Technological Education, 28(3), 187–201.
56.
NewtonD. P. (2012). Recognising creativity. In NewtonL. (Ed.), Creativity for a new curriculum: 5–11 (pp. 108–119). London, UK: Routledge.
57.
NiuW. (2009). Development of creativity research in Chinese societies. In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 374–394). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
OdamG. (2000). Teaching composing in secondary schools: The creative dream. British Journal of Music Education, 17(2), 109–127.
59.
OdenaO. (2012a). Perspectives on musical creativity: Where next? In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity: Insights from music education research (pp. 201–214). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
60.
OdenaO. (2012b). Creativity in the secondary music classroom. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Vol. 1, pp. 512–528). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
OdenaO.WelchG. (2009). A generative model of teachers’ thinking on musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 416–442.
62.
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2009). Making more of music: An evaluation of music in schools 2005–08 (No. 080235). London, UK: Author.
63.
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2011). The annual report of Her Majesty’s chief inspector for education, children’s services and skills. London, UK: Author.
64.
Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). (2012). Music in schools: Wider still, and wider. London, UK: Author.
65.
ReimerB. (1989). A philosophy of music education (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
66.
RockettM.PercivalS. (2002). Thinking for learning. Stafford, UK: Network Educational Press.
67.
RosenblattL. (1986). The aesthetic transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 122–128.
68.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of the hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
Sefton-GreenJ. (2000). From creativity to cultural production: Shared perspectives. In Sefton-GreenJ.SinkerR. (Eds.), Evaluating creativity (pp. 216–32). London, UK: Routledge.
70.
Sefton-GreenJ.ThomsonP.JonesK.BreslerL. (2011). The Routledge international handbook of creative learning. London, UK: Routledge.
71.
SharpC.Le MétaisJ. (2000). The arts, creativity and cultural education: An international perspective. London, UK: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
72.
ShillitoS.BeswickK.BaguleyM. (2008). The aims of art education. Australian Online Journal of Arts Education, 4(1), 1–16.
73.
SiegesmundR. (1998). Why do we teach art today?Studies in Art Education, 39(3), 197–214.
74.
SofowaraO. A. (2007). The use of educational cartoons and comics in enhancing creativity in primary school students in Ile-ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3, 913–920.
75.
SternbergR. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
76.
StrandK. (2005). Nurturing young composers: Exploring the relationship between instruction and transfer in 9–12 year-old students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 165, 17–36.
77.
ToddJ. S. (2012). Musical progression in the English primary school: What is it, what does it look like and how do teachers realise it? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham University, UK.
78.
TorranceE. E. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
79.
ToupsK. E. (2008). The consensual assessment technique as a measure of creativity in children’s musical compositions motivated by visual and verbal stimuli (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Louisiana State University, LA.
80.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2006). Road Maps for Arts Education. Lisbon, Portugal: Author.
81.
WallK.HigginsS.HallE.WoolnerP. (2012). “That’s not quite the way we see it”: The epistemological challenge of visual data. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(1), 3–22. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.730278
82.
WardC. J. (2009). Musical exploration using ICT in the middle and secondary school classroom. International Journal of Music Education, 27(2), 154–168. doi:10.1177/0255761409102323
83.
WebsterP. R. (1990). Creativity as creative thinking. Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 22–28.
84.
WebsterP. (1994). Measure of Creative Thinking in Music-II (MCTM-II): Administrative guidelines. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
85.
WebsterP. (2002). Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. In SullivanT.WillinghamL. (Eds.), Creativity and music education. Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
86.
WebsterP.HickeyM. (1995). Rating scales and their use in assessing children’s compositions. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 6(4), 28–44.
87.
WoolnerP.ClarkJ.HallE.TipladyL.ThomasU.WallK. (2010). Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: Using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. Learning Environment Research, 13, 1–22.
88.
WrightJ. (1990). The artist, the art teacher, and misplaced faith: Creativity and art education. Art Education, 43(6), 50–57.
89.
ZbainosD.AnastasopoulouA. (2012). Creativity in Greek music curricula and pedagogy: An investigation of Greek music teachers’ perceptions. Creative Education, 3(1), 55–60.
