This paper is a preliminary attempt to describe how flow was experienced by an eminent singer-songwriter from the Philippines. Csikszentmihalyi (1990, 1996) has written extensively about the elements of the flow state among creative people and its contributions to positive psychology and optimal level of functioning. Through multiple in-depth interviews (nine hours and 45 minutes of conversation) conducted with the artist-collaborator, it was evident that while flow was indeed experienced and keenly felt, there were cross-cultural variations and nuances that made the experience distinct. This paper explores how the concept of flow can be extended further to reflect the realities of an artist coming from a different sociocultural background. The implications of the research findings for educators and practitioners are discussed.
BarrettM. S. (2011). A cultural psychology of music education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BoydJ. (1992). Musicians in tune: Seventy-five contemporary musicians discuss the creative process. New York, NY: Fireside, Simon & Schuster.
3.
ByrneC.MacDonaldR.CarltonL. (2003). Assessing creativity in musical compositions: Flow as an assessment tool. British Journal of Music Education, 20(3), 277–290.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1982). Towards a psychology of optimal experience. In WheelerL. (Ed.), Annual review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 13–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
9.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
ElliottD. J. (2005). Introduction. In ElliottD. J. (Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
EnriquezV. G. (1982). Decolonizing the Filipino psyche: Philippine psychology in the seventies. Quezon City, Philippines: Philippine Psychology Research House.
12.
Garces-BacsalR. M. (2014). Finding flow in artistic skill and technique: Narratives of young artists-in-training in Singapore. In LumC. (Ed.), Contextualized practices in arts education: An international dialogue on Singapore (pp. 191–210). Singapore: Springer.
13.
Garces-BacsalR. M.HernandezJ. F.CabangonN. (2010, November). Semantics and soul in Pinoy music: Forging a sense of national identity through Filipino musical talent and artistry: A case study and a musical performance. Paper presented at Narrative Soundings—Narrative Inquiry in Music Education 3, Brisbane, Australia.
14.
Garces-BacsalR. M.HernandezJ. F.CabangonN. (2012, January). Music as voice of the masses: Cultural influences in talent development. Paper presented at Cultural Diversity in Music Education Conference, Singapore.
15.
GreenL. (2001). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. London, UK: Ashgate.
16.
GunzenhauserM. G. (2006). A moral epistemology of knowing subjects: Theorizing a relational turn for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 621–627.
17.
HillmanJ. (1996). The soul’s code: In search of character and calling. New York, NY: Warner Books.
18.
JungC. G. (1965). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York, NY: Vintage.
19.
MacDonaldR.ByrneC.CarltonL. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 292–306.
MaslowA. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
22.
MaslowA. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York, NY: Viking Press.
23.
MayL. F. (2005). Early musical development of selected African American jazz musicians in Indianapolis in the 1930s and 1940s. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, XXVII(1), 21–32.
24.
MerrickE. (1999). An exploration of quality in qualitative research. In KopalaM.SuzukiL. (Eds.), Using qualitative methods in psychology (pp. 25–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
NeumanE. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
26.
O’NeillS. (1999). Flow theory and the development of musical performance skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 129–134.
27.
PiirtoJ. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
28.
ReynoldsF. C.PiirtoJ. (2007). Honoring and suffering the thorn: Marking, naming and eldering, depth psychology II. Roeper Review, 29, 48–53.
29.
RiggsK. (2006). Foundations for flow: A philosophical model for studio instruction. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 14(2), 175–191.
30.
SlobodaJ. A.HoweM. J. A. (1991). Biological precursors of musical excellence: An interview study. Psychology of Music, 19, 3–21.
31.
VeblenK. K. (2005). Community music and praxialism: Narratives and reflections. In ElliottD. J. (Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues (pp. 308–328). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
